Proposal: Toronto and Anaheim

Toronto makebeleifs

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
1,994
707
Youd think he was cam fowler.


I think jvr is a good fit and has a good contract, problem is we have to make a move without losing a forward which leaves defense.. vatanen and fowler straight across are fair value but moving fowler is bad on anaheims part, id be okay with vatanen.

No way we can move 2 of theodore montour and larsson in same trade, and honestly id argue 2 of them combined are valued higher than jvr.

I would do something like vatanen for jvr, montour + 1st for jvr (has to be some sort of cap taken back)... i value theodore and larsson higher than montour... not sure if i consider them for jvr mostly cause he only has a lil time left on contract.

Hmmm. I'd absolutely consider both of those. Would you do (for cap reasons) jvr+hunwick (@50%) for montour, 1st 2018 and stoner?
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,561
39,416
Hmmm. I'd absolutely consider both of those. Would you do (for cap reasons) jvr+hunwick (@50%) for montour, 1st 2018 and stoner?

I dont think that fits under our cap m, were pretty tight against it and jvr is more expensive than stoner. But something around that idea would work from my perspective assuming we can get the caps to work
 

Toronto makebeleifs

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
1,994
707
I dont think that fits under our cap m, were pretty tight against it and jvr is more expensive than stoner. But something around that idea would work from my perspective assuming we can get the caps to work

Who could we also take back to make it work? Someone not named bieksa; sorry, he is quickly approaching buyout territory.maybe balance it out by sending over cogs and we send a small add, maybe dzerkalis? Korostelev
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad