can someone please explain why any of this matters other than lockout protection?
I'd guess its about getting the money at one payment per year, so it can be invested somewhere for profit. $1M today is better that $100,000 per month for 10 months
can someone please explain why any of this matters other than lockout protection?
It’s 27 or 7 years pro . It’s the secondWhat is everyone talking about saying that this takes him to UFA?
I thought UFA was after his 3rd contract for hitting age 27.
This contract does neither of those.
In what way is Tavares better? Marner is the only player on the team that has any argument for being better than Matthews.
Are you going to say that Murray > Crosby and Malkin because goaltending is important as well?
but matthews was never getting bought out before age 26 so it means nothing in that sense.Makes the contract buyout proof. You now have TWO huge contracts that are essentially buyout proof. Both are generational talents but **** happens and stacking buyout proof contracts is a recipe for disaster.
Still amazed that he would get that AAV for 5 years. Dude is a stud, but that's a pricy contract. Maybe I'm just out of touch now...
Remember when Matthews and Marner were gonna take discounts to play for Toronto?
Remember when there was no way Dubas couldn't sign all 3 kids? I 'member...Remember when Matthews and Marner were gonna take discounts to play for Toronto?
It's so frustrating that all these RFA's are commanding this kind of money. On a 5-year deal he should not have received that much... happy to have him, but you bought 1 UFA year and that's unacceptable at that price.
But but but O thought he was going to Arizona LOL
no? we lose gardiner... who cares? year after that we lost the 6.25 marleau contract, no problems here.Nothing really wrong with the contract, but anyone who doesn't think there's gonna be some serious offseason roster gymnastics to make this all work is deluded at this point.
Hot take: Dubas sucks at RFA contracts