LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2010
- 47,388
- 16,028
Holland for Schroeder e4
I find this hard to believe. TSN is never bullish on anything Leafs and people were generallt WTF at the time, because the Leafs had just lost Colborne for cheap due to waiver eligibility.
If that is the case then he will be claimed. If not then maybe he needs more work and a two way deal for one or two years may be the best thing for him. Heck if he is a NHL player a two way deal means nothing to him.
Peter Holland is actually an NHL player, how could Lou argue he deserves a two-way?
He won't get enough of an arb reward so the team can walk away, as well.
I agree. Would also free up a contract spot.
I still can't get over the "Leafs Fans" on our forum actually thinking this guy is better than one of Kadri or Bozak.
Though it was more like the Kadri haters saying Holland was better than Kadri, and the Bozak haters saying Holland was better than Bozak. You know how to find and idiot troll when...
Still can't believe Carlyle played him for 4 minutes every game on the 4th liner to burn that 2nd
Has anyone seen Jesse Blacker recently?
Holland's arbitration hearing is on Monday. I'm wondering if that gets rescheduled if someone decides to claim him. I'm sure a team wouldn't claim him unless they have a clearly defined role for him. Still, if the hold up is a one-way contract, then give him one. The Leafs have the financial power to give fringe NHLers one-way contracts to play in the AHL.
I don't think they really care either way.
Option 1: He gets claimed and they don't have to deal with him.
Option 2: Shows his value, easy contract to handle, gets a 2-way deal.
The hold up is more to do with cap space I'd say. It has nothing to do with giving him a two-way deal because we are too cheap to give him a one-way deal (salary wise).
I'm sure if he clears, we'll get him for a lot less than he deserves and then we'll try to sell him off to a cap or budget team. I guess Lou is counting on maybe as much as 750k difference in cap space (or salary savings) making a big difference on the trade market.
Not true.
Claiming the player gives the player quite the leverage in negotiating a new contract (which still needs to be done with the new team).
Unless a team truly things he's worth the upper range in salary, or that he'll be claimed by someone else with greater priority in October, they would be smart to wait, let the Leafs settle on a cheaper contract, and claim him later.
That said, I think this is poor flexing, by Lou. It worked with MIN and Schroeder, but Holland has a much better case than Schroeder, is much more likely to be claimed, and really has no reason to be on a two-way.
There's much I like about what Lou is bringing, but there is much I very much question. (Not like, "What are you doing?? You are ruining the team!" but the small things, that make you say, "Why? That's not necessary..." I don't think he is the best at asset management, especially minor asset management, for example.)
I wouldn't hate TB claiming him for some depth.
Ducks cut ties at the perfect time
Tampa is the very definition of depth.