Still better than $9.25M for a #4.that's a lot for a #2
Rielly makes 5 now, so they need to find 2.5 million for his raise. You have 1.2 from the Kessel retention coming off the books, and another million cap increase. So as of this team they’re .3 million in difference and can run it back if they wish. It’s always a problem until it’s not.With the Rielly signing does this mean that 1 of the big 4 will be traded?
Nylander would be the easiest to trade but the Leafs would be nuts to trade him since he has such a good contract with them.
Tavares is untradeable because no one would want to picked up his contract. The Leafs would probably have to give assets away to trade him.
Matthews should be untouchable unless there is some kind of falling out between him and the team. Since I have never heard anything about that he is not going anywhere.
Marner is the one. He is the only logical choice. Marner is still young enough that some team would be willing to trade for him and may even be willing to pay up (with assets) for him without the Leafs retaining a good chunk of his contract.
If they Leafs do not trade one of the big 4 then they will no longer be a PO team starting as early as next year.
Yeah that contract looks ugly in comparison but I’m trying to pretend it doesn’t exist
Your number 4 (and 3) make basically minimum wage less than MR.Morgan Rielly is a top D Man? Hope you're laughing at your own joke there...
I think it's funny how you go "take it easy man" when McDavid gets mentioned and then go on trying to de-value his achievements in the post.You are talking about the best goal scorer in the NHL and reining Rocket Richard winner. Take it easy man…why did you have to bring McDavid into this thread anyway? To stir the pot?
McDavids secondary assists don’t impress me.
Finally, Nurse is an average D man worth less than half of what he is paid. Average 20-30 point 2nd pairing. He is making $9.25M…stop lying. He took the Oilers to the bank at gun point.
Campbell is why I was surprised they paid for Mrazek, who is always injured. They might lose Campbell for that. I was expecting a $1-2M back up - not $3.8M for several years for Mrazek.It’s a fair deal for the length of contract. He will be 35 when this deal ends. A six year deal would have been worth 8 million per year. I’m happy that Reilly signed but I don’t know how they will possibly keep Campbell if someone does not get traded.
Campbell is someone whose struggled mentally with being comfortable playing in certain environments. That's not to say I'd expect him to pay for pennies, but I'd wager he will be accommodating with management (within reason) for an extension.
The only problem they would have trading Tavares is getting around his NMC. Assuming we miss out on Eichel I'd take Tavares on the Flames next year. We'd have to send back Monahan for position and cap reasons but he'd be an expiring contract that shouldn't be too hard to unload. Flames would certainly be adding to that deal. There are other teams that would love to have a PPG #1 centre even if he is overpaid by 1-2 million.Tavares is untradeable because no one would want to picked up his contract. The Leafs would probably have to give assets away to trade him.
Who says he has to be a # 1 ? He isnt paid like one. If he could be a 1B or 2 that would be ideal. The leafs are not going to get better D for that price. Its now up to dubas to dump as top 4 forward.His deal is not bad at face value. The question is... is it worth it for the Leafs. No it isn't. Have you guys not seen your playoff performances? You need a legit all purpose number 1. Rielly is absolutely not that. The only other way to win with Rielly is if you win by committee on defense, but that will be hard to do with the way your cap structured on offense. Unless Marner is traded for a steal return that includes a young and cheap solid defender and great top 6 player, this deal does nothing for the Leafs. Leafs will not win with Rielly.
Leafs are arguing about his contract; it's not that terrible of a contract(even though his comparable is more similar to Krug and Girard impact wise) but his contract in relation to what Leafs actually need is bad.
This guy gets it. Might not be an impediment, but that's contingent on Rielly not declining even a bit.
He's still very questionable in his own zone and has a tendency to play like he's a winger from time to time. This doesn't really address the Leafs issues, more-so a "we're glad that you've been with us for so long" contract, but the Leafs not addressing their issues is pretty common-place nowadays.Good deal. He's a top pairing guy with some warts, but those warts are why he's making $7.5 million instead of $9.5 million or more.
Because of his skating, he's also probably not going to fall off as much in the later years of the deal compared to some guys who aren't that good at skating.
For a #2 the salary is fine
my concern is the length and final 3 yrs and the ROI.
He did score a 72 point season in 2019! That makes him a 70 point D man. Not 4 years ago. He is only 27 at that. Fact is, takes D men longer to hit their prime as well.
Absolutely awesome deal he signed! He took a nice discount to stay in Toronto.
Would you kindly explain to the me the logic behind a leaf hater hoping someone from a core that loses in the first round every year would be wishing that they make a trade? Would a leaf hater rather they stay with the status quo?Very fair deal for a player of his caliber. Leaf haters hoping that someone from the core has to be traded now are dreaming.
He took a cut considering what nurse and Jones got.