Confirmed Signing with Link: [TOR] F Auston Matthews signs extension with the Maple Leafs (4 years, $13.25M AAV)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,840
86,570
Redmond, WA
Are you a new fan? Do you understand how the cap works?

Yes I understand how the cap works. Matthews got more money than MacKinnon got last year at half of the term. The "half of the term" is the driving factor here, he got an 8 year AAV for 4 years and will be able to get an even higher AAV in 4 years now because of it.
 

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
25,068
31,536
He’ll have a year left and will be asking for the most money in the league.
The four years isn’t an accident. He will be asking for a new deal with a year left. A year after McDavid resets the market again. Countdown to the next ridiculous contract begins already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 94 Oil Drops

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,580
29,993
Yes I understand how the cap works. Matthews got more money than MacKinnon got last year at half of the term. The "half of the term" is the driving factor here, he got an 8 year AAV for 4 years and will be able to get an even higher AAV in 4 years now because of it.

8 years would lower the cap hit. He actually signed basically the same cap% as Mackinnon. And Matthews is a better player than MacKinnon or at the very least they are the same level.

Not sure how people can try and pretend Matthews isn't there. Well I do know why, a combo of not watching the player and Leaf hate. Matthews had a meh season with his 40 goals last year, apparently that is all it takes to wipe out 3 seasons of 60+ goal paces and being the highest g/pg player since he entered the league while having size and being a good two way center
 

Rude Dog

Registered User
Dec 22, 2008
4,319
3,431
4 more years. I like it. Finding a stud first line center is tough. I like the shorter deal. I am not sure his wrists will hold up. Good deal. How often do 8 year deals work out for the team?
 
Last edited:

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
32,568
33,805
Dartmouth,NS
I don't think the term is exactly a bad thing....to me a perfect contract length would have been 6 years. 4 years isn't amazing but end of the day it is a pretty manageable raise of just under 2 million on what we are already paying him and we have him locked in for his entire prime. Biggest worry with this deal is honestly that it might mean curtains on any hope of getting Willy locked up.
 

TheDoldrums

Registered User
May 3, 2016
13,034
20,295
Newcastle, Ontario
Let me ask you, are you happy your best player just demanded and got a million more than every other star contract…and wouldnt go more than four years unlike literally every other top contract

It's $625k more than every other star contract. Treliving already gave Ryan Reaves $600k more than the league minimum and David Kampf about $1 million more than he should be paid. That's where the actual overpayments that wreck a team come from, not from keeping your elite talent.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,750
17,236
Victoria
Yeah, it's bad term now, but unless he's the second coming of Martin St. Louis, you're only paying him for his remaining peak years. Resign him after for less, or let him walk to a foolish team.
It's not bad term. It's team-friendly. Toronto just keeps him for his prime years and can re-evaluate if there is age or injury-related decline.
 

FrozenJagrt

Registered User
Dec 16, 2009
10,571
4,673
I don't think the term is exactly a bad thing....to me a perfect contract length would have been 6 years. 4 years isn't amazing but end of the day it is a pretty manageable raise of just under 2 million on what we are already paying him and we have him locked in for his entire prime. Biggest worry with this deal is honestly that it might mean curtains on any hope of getting Willy locked up.
I think the bigger worry is Marner asking for an identical deal.
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,660
15,280
Pickering, Ontario
Yes I understand how the cap works. Matthews got more money than MacKinnon got last year at half of the term. The "half of the term" is the driving factor here, he got an 8 year AAV for 4 years and will be able to get an even higher AAV in 4 years now because of it.
He got 2M overpaid on deal 2 and 3M overpaid on year 3

Matthews is going to sign 4 years at 15M his next deal and the leafs may be the idiots who get bent over for a 3rd time
 

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
38,979
7,924
Montreal, Quebec
I have to agree. I'd rather a 7 year 14 million deal then this.

Pretty much anyone would... except Matthews. It sounds like Toronto pushed for it too (or just longer term in general) and he pretty much said "nope." That's the problem with giving him a NMC. Toronto had zero leverage here. Either sign your best player based on his terms or let him walk for absolutely nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad