He's a better prospect despite being drafted almost twice as low and developing slower than Honka has?
Whether its Gardiner, Kapanen, or any other given player, leaf fans and only leaf fans consistently find a way to overrate what they have while devaluing what all 29 other teams have. "Star potential" should be reserved for players who have a high likelihood of reaching that potential. Sure Kapanen has star potential, the same way any player taken within rounds 1-7 of the draft has "potential" to be a star.
He has 36 points in 56 career AHL games. And 0 points in 9 NHL games. Nothing about anything he's ever done in his entire career has suggested he has a high chance of becoming a star. There is a chance, yes, and I hope it happens for the kid. But his value as a prospect is directly proportional to the likelihood he reaches that potential, which in all fairness isn't nearly as high as TML nation believes it is.
Honka>kapanen as an asset.
lots wrong with this - 7 spots difference in their draft selections, not close to double
If you're going to use draft position as the basis for the differentiation between them, you also must acknowledge that Kapanen universally rated higher at their draft time by credible sources and that Honka was not rated by any of those sources as high as you took him:
http://www.mynhldraft.com/2014-nhl-draft-prospect-rankings/
Honka has been the #1 scoring defenseman on the Texas Stars for 2 seasons, Kapanen was the
11th scoring forward on a ludicrously deep Marlies team last year, he had no opportunity to score but did demonstrate that he can be very effective in a checking role - great wheels and will grind, he also put up a good scoring rate for his age. He was also the highest scoring teenager on his Liiga team by a fair margin in his D+1, and was a year younger than the next guy. He's at 9 pts in 8 games this year now that 8 or 9 of the players who were ahead of him last year are no longer with the team (Soshnikov just got called up, he's the 9th), his ceiling is still very high
I agree that there's nothing to indicate Kapanen is above Honka, but there's no clear indicator the other way either unless you just mean that RHD>Wingers
Try to avoid using sweeping generalizations about a fanbase, especially if you're going to look only at box scores to do your evaluations before doing the exact thing that you just criticized "leaf fans and only leaf fans" for doing in devaluing other teams assets