34.But what’s that in Taney years?
34.But what’s that in Taney years?
Late to the party...You aren't good at math.
34+6=40
You have added on magic numbers
Dude will be 35 and untradable for 5 yearsIt never will be because it was signed at 34
Dude will be 35 and untradable for 5 years
Call it whatever makes you feel like it's a good deal
His next contract if he signs one, will be though.It's not a 35+ contract
Yet
He will have a NMC, that he can agree to wave.Dude will be 35 and untradable for 5 years
Call it whatever makes you feel like it's a good deal
That doesn't make it a 35+ contract though so, objectively you are still incorrect.Dude will be 35 and untradable for 5 years
Call it whatever makes you feel like it's a good deal
Nah he’ll be retired or Ltir long before that . Hes going to help immensely till thenThat might be 'optimistic'.......with the frightening run of injuries this guy has had, when the bottom drops out of the bag, it will happen quickly.
Tanev has had a stellar NHL career for a guy who was never drafted, and has made every blueline he's ever played on that much better. But he'll be a serious 'buy-out' candidate in two seasons. And the Lafs will still be paying Tanev when his hits his 40th birthday.
But when you're as desperate for quality d-men as the Leafs, are, I guess 'desperate times' call for 'desperate measures'.
Try 40 . You don’t math well do you …6 year deal, takes him to what, 44 yrs old??
Of course the league is looking at this.............what are the rules about signing a contract after the age of 35?
Another one late to the party...Try 40 . You don’t math well do you …
Are you self proclaimed tardiness inspector or smth?Another one late to the party...
I'm just reporting facts...Are you self proclaimed tardiness inspector or smth?
No party that I want to attendAnother one late to the party...
Then simply pay attention...No party that I want to attend
It is possible that he does.Always thought Tanev had a game that would not age well.
Always thought Tanev had a game that would not age well.
Tanev has never had the type of injuries that would see him on LTIR.He's had so many injuries that it won't be a surprise if he's a LTIR candidate in a few years. There is nothing the league can do about this if he's legit hurt. This is not the same situation where someone is put on LTIR and then is back on the first playoff game. I think that is something the league is more likely to view poorly, in light of some recent ltir 'injuries'.
There is not really any argument- it is not a +35 contract. Tanev has been pretty healthy the last couple of years. The fact that he can "waive if he wants" is just a fact. There is no solace to be taken. It is not a horrible contract at all.Oh my God the cope in here..arguing what to call a contract. Winning the semantics argument, congratulations.
TOR management gave a 34 year old injury prone middle D 6 years with a full NMC at full market rate.
It's a horrible move. I guess taking solace in the fact that "he can waive it if he wants" makes it less horrible.
Tanev agent deserves a bonus
you will be.... you will be......I'm sure eventually it will be a bad deal but I'm not worried about 2029
you will be.... you will be......
![]()
But you can't buy him out if he's injured, n'est-ce pas ?Some players play till they're 40; but those players are typically hall of fame level like Chris Pronger or Duncan Keith.
Then you have a 2nd pairing d-man like Tanev and everyone here knows there's a 0% chance he plays this contract out. It's purpose is for buy out in the remaining years.