tmlms13
Registered User
Bruh you spelled 31st wrong
![]()
32nd* Seattle's in the draft
But technically 31st because of Arizona's forfeit
Bruh you spelled 31st wrong
![]()
It’s a second round pick really.we can win the presidents trophy this year. Getting better by the trade too. Out 1st round picks are seconds. Ignore the complaints i doPeople are still complaining about a first???
Why is it so hard to understand that the deal was not just a first for Foligno. It was a first for Foligno AND 50% retention.
That first overall pick won’t see the NHL in YEARS from now. We’re in win now mode.
We have enough prospects and plenty more to come.
Damned if we make a move and damned if we don’t.
Look at comparable to Foligno in recent years and see it's well in line with other similar player's returns. Barclay Goodrow is probably the best comparable to Foligno and he also returned a 1st.. did Tampa misread the market too?Or Dubas simply misread the market and undervalued what a 1st-2nd could get you.
People are still complaining about a first???
Why is it so hard to understand that the deal was not just a first for Foligno. It was a first for Foligno AND 50% retention.
That first overall pick won’t see the NHL in YEARS from now. We’re in win now mode.
We have enough prospects and plenty more to come.
Damned if we make a move and damned if we don’t.
its funny that the only team getting heat for not trading a 2nd for Hall is the toronto maple leafs, when if he's the player people say, then every playoffs team could have both used him and beat that offer.
anyways, there's a reason why Boston needed to get him - not sure people realize how dire things are offensively in Boston this year - they are 27th in 5v5 gf/60, and 29th in 5v5 xgf/60. They are desperate for offense, and the only team that was willing to even give up a 2nd rounder for him.
Oddly enough, we could probably use a PP ace right now, but I doubt he'd get the time he needs to thrive thereI literally posted a Foligno + Nash deal here weeks ago. Players that have been the defensive leaders in elite defensive usage for some of the better defensive teams in the league.
My angle has always been thus.
But yes you are right - Palmieri is clearly the better PP player. and has been moderately more productive at even strength (1.64p60 vs 1.42 at EV last 3yrs) in dramatically more offensive usage.
Did anyone in the thread already said “overpayment”? Because I for one think that 1st is too much. Like the player and all, but he is not worth it imho.
No ... there are 47 pages and you're the first one to say "overpayment"Did anyone in the thread already said “overpayment”? Because I for one think that 1st is too much. Like the player and all, but he is not worth it imho.
On a "typical" year, a rental of someone like Hall (50% retained) would get more than a 2nd. Regardless of him having a bad year so far and having a nmc. I mean come on...Look at comparable to Foligno in recent years and see it's well in line with other similar player's returns. Barclay Goodrow is probably the best comparable to Foligno and he also returned a 1st.. did Tampa misread the market too?
It will take at least 4 years for a late first round pick to be an impact player. In 2025 are you going to be saying dam I wish we didn't trade that 2021 first round pick. This isn't 2014-2016.
I'm not losing sleep over it though. While it's true Dubas paid more for a bottom 6 player than the market dictated, picks this year will be a complete and total crapshoot. I kind of understand the tactic of "Picks are far more useless this year than usual, so lets just use them to get the players we want and who gives a crap about 'market value' of them".
Oddly enough, we could probably use a PP ace right now, but I doubt he'd get the time he needs to thrive there
no one is saying the pickup isnt good ... sure foligno will help by moving players down the lineup .......... but you have to weigh in the cost and asset management side of things.