Value of: Top pair LD to LA

[Kingspiracy]

What top pair (or nearish) Lhd could be available for LA?

Ideally a durable 6'2 220 type guy that can put up some points. Under say 28yrs, and not with a crappy contract.

I'm not looking to move either Byfield or Clarke but everyone else can be discussed.

Whose moveable?

Click to read more...

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

Chychurn

maybe hampus in free agency, if he doesn’t resign in Anaheim, doubt we’d trade him to you tho

 

[Kingspiracy]

Chychurn

maybe hampus in free agency, if he doesn’t resign in Anaheim

Either would be nice, Chychurn would be great, but i havent seen much agreement in value (ie yotes fans want Byfield or clarke +)

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

Either would be nice, Chychurn would be great, but i havent seen much agreement in value (ie yotes fans want Byfield or clarke +)

I think want and what they get is prob much different…. See Buffalo wants vs actual offer.

kings can make competitive offers without those 2

 

[Kingspiracy]

I think want and what they get is prob much different…. See Buffalo wants vs actual offer.

kings can make competitive offers without those 2

Yep, definately, but i can understand wanting to get another teams top dog prospect for one of your best players, I just doubt LA goes there.

It will be interesting to see if guys like Provorov or Werenski could be pried away.

 

[elitepete]

Yep, definately, but i can understand wanting to get another teams top dog prospect for one of your best players, I just doubt LA goes there.

It will be interesting to see if guys like Provorov or Werenski could be pried away.

Lol. You are not getting Provorov without Byfield or Clarke.

Werenski would probably require both...

 

[Kingspiracy]

Lol. You are not getting Provorov without Byfield or Clarke.

Werenski would probably require both...

Lol,

"that's just like your opinion man"

Perhaps, but LA has a lot of good prospects

 

[elitepete]

Lol,

"that's just like your opinion man"

Perhaps, but LA has a lot of good prospects

I think you shold aim a little lower than those two considering what you have off the table.

There's speculation that Theodore may be available, and Vegas is more likely to make a trade like that due to their cap situation. But even then, they would probably trade Marchessault or Smith first. Vegas also probably wouldn't want to trade him within their division, but they did trade Schmidt within their division (although not the same level of player), so who knows.

If Byfield and Clarke aren't available, it would probably require something like Vilardi/turcotte+unprotected 1st+your next best d prospect

 

[Kingspiracy]

I think you shold aim a little lower than those two considering what you have off the table.

There's speculation that Theodore may be available, and Vegas is more likely to make a trade like that due to their cap situation. But even then, they would probably trade Marchessault or Smith first. Vegas also probably wouldn't want to trade him within their division, but they did trade Schmidt within their division (although not the same level of player), so who knows.

If Byfield and Clarke aren't available, it would probably require something like Vilardi/turcotte+unprotected 1st+your next best d prospect

Im fine with that (except perhaps not the 1st without some protection), you've got to give to get.

I doubt vegas will trade with us unless they run out of options.

Im just interested to see who is available with Byfield and Clarke off the table.

 

[BozoTheClown]

Ben Chariot at 1.750 mil.

 

[Kingspiracy]

Ben Chariot at 1.750 mil.

Not awful, but a little older than id like. I love the physicality but that next contract isnt going to look good when he wears down .

 

[toomuchsauce]

How about Dahlin for Turcotte and Clarke?

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

OEL.

You’re welcome

2045 7th rounder will suffice.

 

[Kingspiracy]

How about Dahlin for Turcotte and Clarke?

Like i said in the op, i dont want to move Clarke. Probably fairish, but i want to see who is out there without moving Clarke or Byfield.

 

[Kingspiracy]

OEL.

You’re welcome

2045 7th rounder will suffice.

Has he found the fountain of youth?

 

[Djp]

I think want and what they get is prob much different…. See Buffalo wants vs actual offer.

kings can make competitive offers without those 2

get real

buffalo return was hurt due to Eichel injury.

you aren’t going to get a top young LD by giving up spare parts.

 

[Kingspiracy]

get real

buffalo return was hurt due to Eichel injury.

you aren’t going to get a top young LD by giving up spare parts.

I think theyre a Ducks fan, so they arent trading for anyone in this case.

We do still have a boatload of guys other than those two prospects that are hardly "spare parts"

 

[kanucks25]

"I want a youngish top-pair D-man in his prime that's on a good contract but you can't have my best pieces."

GL

 

[bernmeister]

What top pair (or nearish) Lhd could be available for LA?

Ideally a durable 6'2 220 type guy that can put up some points. Under say 28yrs, and not with a crappy contract.

I'm not looking to move either Byfield or Clarke but everyone else can be discussed.

Whose moveable?

Lindgren is a hair under the height requirement.
He should properly not be made available this season [unlike Strome] b'c we can finesse his exit when we are down to the wire and have to, not before.
Rangers will deal Strome, Geo, Nemeth, Hajek, not sign 1 or 2 cheap guys like McKegg, and recover 1.5 buyout cap hit for Hank.
Covers the shade under 12 we need for Zib + Fox increases next season.

Howev, for LaF + Kakko etc we also need a stopgap 1 or 2 yr solution while we see if Trouba will waive early or not.
Lindgren is only just into 3 x 3 but when every nickel helps, he could go esp since we have adequate reserve of young elc D.

Lindgren is the real deal. If he is put on the open market, competitive bidding will drive up the price.
Let's see what you consider a fair offer, let alone a competitive one...

 

[KniespassZegras]

Yep, definately, but i can understand wanting to get another teams top dog prospect for one of your best players, I just doubt LA goes there.

It will be interesting to see if guys like Provorov or Werenski could be pried away.

you wouldnt like the price for Werenski lol

 

[KniespassZegras]

Lol,

"that's just like your opinion man"

Perhaps, but LA has a lot of good prospects

Nah, he's right. it would start with Byfield+Clarke.

Werenski is signed for 7 more years after this

 

[AcerComputer]

Muzzin can be had

 

[Kingspiracy]

Lindgren is a hair under the height requirement.
He should properly not be made available this season [unlike Strome] b'c we can finesse his exit when we are down to the wire and have to, not before.
Rangers will deal Strome, Geo, Nemeth, Hajek, not sign 1 or 2 cheap guys like McKegg, and recover 1.5 buyout cap hit for Hank.
Covers the shade under 12 we need for Zib + Fox increases next season.

Howev, for LaF + Kakko etc we also need a stopgap 1 or 2 yr solution while we see if Trouba will waive early or not.
Lindgren is only just into 3 x 3 but when every nickel helps, he could go esp since we have adequate reserve of young elc D.

Lindgren is the real deal. If he is put on the open market, competitive bidding will drive up the price.
Let's see what you consider a fair offer, let alone a competitive one...

Im not sure Lindgren has the points in him. I cant say that ive followed him, but is he likely to be an upgrade on someone like bjornfot?

 

[Kingspiracy]

Nah, he's right. it would start with Byfield+Clarke.

Werenski is signed for 7 more years after this

Yeah, i know, was just quoting a movie.

 

[Kingspiracy]

Muzzin can be had

Yeah, great dman, but we've been there and done that. He'd be getting a bit long in the tooth for what we are trying to do.