They’re only good trade chips if they aren’t near the playoffs by the deadline. Otherwise I’d think they’d keep them for a run. In which case they’d be just left with Schwindt, a decent prospect but likely just a good bottom 6 guy at his ceiling.
has gone on record about wanting to retire here.
Additionally, we lose one of our top defenders, a prospect AND yet another first round pick.
When you consider the amount of first round picks we’ve given up lately only to end up with a worse roster than a season ago - I just don’t see how this is good asset management.
You have to assume Barkov doesn’t like this deal either, given his friendship with Huby and on ice chemistry.
To me, trading your franchise player should be an absolute last resort. These are guys who the organization ought to be loyal to. You want players to commit to playing here and that won’t happen if management develops a reputation for trading guys away the second they falter. Yes, Huby had a bad playoff - but only a season before that he played really well. He also scored 115 points in the regular season.
I also think this is too much turnover. We just overhauled the roster a few years ago and seemingly are doing it again. It’s not like we missed the playoffs or something, we’re coming off a president’s trophy. At some point you need roster stability.
I hope I’m proven wrong.
My instant reaction is I don’t like this. Jonathan Huberdeau has been with the franchise for a decade and has gone on record about wanting to retire here. I feel many are discounting that his game will likely age very well as he doesn’t rely on speed but rather finesse and playmaking. Some may scoff at this, but I would’ve given him 8x80 and I think he would’ve been productive for a vast majority of that deal.
Additionally, we lose one of our top defenders, a prospect AND yet another first round pick.
When you consider the amount of first round picks we’ve given up lately only to end up with a worse roster than a season ago - I just don’t see how this is good asset management.
You have to assume Barkov doesn’t like this deal either, given his friendship with Huby and on ice chemistry.
To me, trading your franchise player should be an absolute last resort. These are guys who the organization ought to be loyal to. You want players to commit to playing here and that won’t happen if management develops a reputation for trading guys away the second they falter. Yes, Huby had a bad playoff - but only a season before that he played really well. He also scored 115 points in the regular season.
I also think this is too much turnover. We just overhauled the roster a few years ago and seemingly are doing it again. It’s not like we missed the playoffs or something, we’re coming off a president’s trophy. At some point you need roster stability.
I hope I’m proven wrong.
I dunno. If asked, of course Barkov will say he wants to keep Hubs. Then it creates an awkward situation when Zito trades him anyway.I’d be amazed if Zito didn’t let Barkov know before, ”ask his permission” so to speak.
After all he’s the face of the franchise and C
If Hubby didn’t know, I highly doubt Barkov would have.I’d be amazed if Zito didn’t let Barkov know before, ”ask his permission” so to speak.
After all he’s the face of the franchise and C
If Hubby didn’t know, I highly doubt Barkov would have.
I dunno. If asked, of course Barkov will say he wants to keep Hubs. Then it creates an awkward situation when Zito trades him anyway.
Just wanted to say that he doesn't rely on speed, yes, but that doesn't negate that him being a poor skater is an overall negative to his game. He won't get faster as he ages either. The game has only sped up, not down, and I don't see that changing. What does that mean? Less likely to be an effective back-checker. If he coughs up the puck he almost certainly isn't getting it back. I'm not exactly sure how it will affect his offensive game moving forward as he has a tendency of slowing the game down to his pace when he chooses to.My instant reaction is I don’t like this. Jonathan Huberdeau has been with the franchise for a decade and has gone on record about wanting to retire here. I feel many are discounting that his game will likely age very well as he doesn’t rely on speed but rather finesse and playmaking. Some may scoff at this, but I would’ve given him 8x80 and I think he would’ve been productive for a vast majority of that deal.
Additionally, we lose one of our top defenders, a prospect AND yet another first round pick.
When you consider the amount of first round picks we’ve given up lately only to end up with a worse roster than a season ago - I just don’t see how this is good asset management.
You have to assume Barkov doesn’t like this deal either, given his friendship with Huby and on ice chemistry.
To me, trading your franchise player should be an absolute last resort. These are guys who the organization ought to be loyal to. You want players to commit to playing here and that won’t happen if management develops a reputation for trading guys away the second they falter. Yes, Huby had a bad playoff - but only a season before that he played really well. He also scored 115 points in the regular season.
I also think this is too much turnover. We just overhauled the roster a few years ago and seemingly are doing it again. It’s not like we missed the playoffs or something, we’re coming off a president’s trophy. At some point you need roster stability.
I hope I’m proven wrong.
My instant reaction is I don’t like this. Jonathan Huberdeau has been with the franchise for a decade and has gone on record about wanting to retire here.
I dunno. If asked, of course Barkov will say he wants to keep Hubs. Then it creates an awkward situation when Zito trades him anyway.
We will see if this new edition of the Panthers
is another regular season juggernaut and a playoff failure.
Or if we will be a good regular season team but a better
stronger playoff team.
After what we saw last playoff season.
Staying with same roster would have been a mistake.
Exactly. Teams are gonna hate playing against us.Think about how many grey hairs Wilson has caused in the East.
Tkachuk is super charged Wilson skill wise
Exactly. Teams are gonna hate playing against us.
It’s similar to when Hornqvist came here. Of course Tkachuk is on another level, but he’s gonna make our players better especially guys like Barkov.
Tkachuk is not super skilled Tom Wilson. More like a super skilled Sean Avery.
There has to be another move coming for a dman right? Probably won’t be able to replace Weegar at this point, but leaving things as is seems like a major risk. Is there someone in the system that might be ready to step in that I’m forgetting about? Or is this guy we signed from Europe going to be getting a good look?
I just dont think Zito will stand pat with this D core.They'll have easily worse regular season and probably get beaten in the first round because they have only two proven top4 dmen. Think of the upcoming season as a building block towards the Lundell&Knight-era and a sunken cost of choosing to allow a guy like Tallon be the GM.