Tkachuk pokes Quick in the eye after the whistle - UPD: 2 Game Suspension

unicornpig

Registered User
Dec 8, 2017
3,855
5,620
I feel like that's a pretty massive stretch to say that was intentional.

Cat eye goalie masks only have a very specific spot that it's even possible to do this in and Tkachuk was behind Quick. Want to suspend him for the result? Whatever, but to say that was intentional is insane.
Youre one of those people who get scammed by telemarketers aren't you
 

YAYSAY

Registered User
Feb 18, 2016
1,337
2,029
I feel like that's a pretty massive stretch to say that was intentional.

Cat eye goalie masks only have a very specific spot that it's even possible to do this in and Tkachuk was behind Quick. Want to suspend him for the result? Whatever, but to say that was intentional is insane.
Puck was already covered, he purposefully moves his stick towards Quicks face then twists it. Insane to think it's not intentional
 

BayStBullies

Burn the Boats!
Apr 1, 2012
5,559
5,054
I feel like that's a pretty massive stretch to say that was intentional.

Cat eye goalie masks only have a very specific spot that it's even possible to do this in and Tkachuk was behind Quick. Want to suspend him for the result? Whatever, but to say that was intentional is insane.
Have you seen multiple angles? It was absolutely intentional. Hard to say if he precisely aimed for the eye, but he intentionally struck him in the face.
 

King'sPawn

Enjoy the chaos
Jul 1, 2003
23,070
23,835
I feel like that's a pretty massive stretch to say that was intentional.

Cat eye goalie masks only have a very specific spot that it's even possible to do this in and Tkachuk was behind Quick. Want to suspend him for the result? Whatever, but to say that was intentional is insane.
Tkachuk has lost the benefit of the doubt.
 

Choralone

Registered User
Oct 16, 2010
5,480
4,482
Burbank, CA
I feel like that's a pretty massive stretch to say that was intentional.

Cat eye goalie masks only have a very specific spot that it's even possible to do this in and Tkachuk was behind Quick. Want to suspend him for the result? Whatever, but to say that was intentional is insane.
He flips his stick over, for no other reason, right before he jabs it in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harry Curry

Shellz

Registered User
May 6, 2009
19,251
2,254
California
I feel like that's a pretty massive stretch to say that was intentional.

Cat eye goalie masks only have a very specific spot that it's even possible to do this in and Tkachuk was behind Quick. Want to suspend him for the result? Whatever, but to say that was intentional is insane.


Just stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fight4yourRight

kilowatt

the vibes are not immaculate
Jan 1, 2009
18,686
21,767
This also occurred literally moments after hitting Quick in the face with the shaft of his stick so 🤷
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stive Morgan

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
86,592
87,682
Redmond, WA
Yet you're the only one to defend it lol. I wouldn't be bragging about your HS hockey career lol

No, I'm saying it's stupid to say that Tkachuk intentionally speared Quick in the eye.

I have no clue what Tkachuk was doing there, but getting under Quick's mask was a total accident there. Or rather, Tkachuk had no way of realistically being able to tell whether he'd get under Quick's mask.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iam76

kingsfan28

Its A Kingspiracy !
Feb 27, 2005
40,590
9,607
Corsi Hill
No I'm someone who actually played goalie my entire life and know how goalie masks work.

To say that Tkachuk intentionally jabbed Quick in the eye with his stick, as he was standing behind him, is just stupid.

A-hole of the league knew exactly what he was doing, from hitting him in the mask, to that play! You don't turn your stick over like that and put it into an eye by accident.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Kingsfan1

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad