GDT: Time To Clean The Litter Box. Canes vs Bolts

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,537
39,949
And the NHL rule is similar:

" A minor or major penalty shall be imposed on a player who skates, jumps into or charges an opponent in any manner. Charging shall mean the actions of a player who, as a result of distance traveled, shall violently check an opponent in any manner."

Jumping into the check is still illegal even if you leave your feet with the check instead of before.

There's actually a lot of dangerous play the NHL could cut down on by calling charging by the book. But like cross-checking, they appear to be looking the other way for a lot of infractions right now.

To be clear, charging has never been called that way in the history of the NHL.
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,765
28,538
Cary, NC
Jumping through a hit after contact has already been made is not charging and has never been called that way, ever. When the rulebook says "jumps into" a hit, they're talking about jumping INTO the hit, not exploding upwards out of it.

Do I wish it was called that way? Sure. I think it would be a safer league without losing much of anything, probably resulting in more entertaining hip checks rather than high hits. I also wish it gave us a major power play and we used that opportunity to win in regulation and we all woke up this morning sunshine and rainbows. But none of that is the reality. The reality is that Necas skated full-speed into a legal open ice body check and this being the NHL rather than a beer league, he was punished for it.

To be clear, my issue is that this was as contact was made and jumping with purpose of pushing contact up.

And that is illegal according to the letter of the law.

The failure to call charging according to the letter is is one reason we have a concussion issue in the NHL.

I will admit this has not been called charging as the NHL traditionally calls it; they want to see a player jumping across the ice into a player when jumping through the check is more violent and more likely to result in injury. And that's part of my problem with the NHL; failure to enforce their rules is endangering players.

With that, I concede this has not been called charging traditionally as @CanesUltimate11 points out above and I'm finished on this topic.
 

TomppaKoo

Registered User
Jan 27, 2021
1,576
1,835
The two hits on Necas were both fine, but I liked Jake of all people to be the guy stepping up.

They owned us in the second. Their ability to hem us in our end is embarrassing. We do it with over the top hustle and grind. The just dance around us, no grind needed....though they can.

They’re just more poised and experienced than us in the big game. That’s what that last play was to me. Pesce making a brilliant play but getting anxious/rushed the next moment and Aho not reading it till it was too late. Just looked panicked. Aho was definitely in the wrong spot.

Good game to see what it takes to win at the highest level. We answered at times but in the end were short. Still got a point. Learn and get ready for the next one.

After giving such a suicide pass to Necas he should be jumping in and taking a beating he deserved for that pass. Good job.

Very entertaining game. I wish Hakanpää will lay someone out big time tonight. Although he does seem to have some trouble keeping up with the quick Tampa players. Point pretty much skated circles around him a couple of times. On the other hand - Point skates circles around anyone most of the time.

It was a very good hockey game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

dogbazinho

Registered User
May 24, 2006
9,471
14,299
Fairfax, VA
Well we did right? Hank is tough. He’s only one guy but you can’t mess up the chemistry more than that by adding more players. The one guy we added brings a lot of what we lack.

Yeah I like the trade for that reason alone but is he fast enough to even catch a player to hit?
 

hblueridgegal

We'll bounce back
Sep 13, 2019
8,209
29,048
Old North State
Dougie making a few bad passes at the onset that prevented possible scoring attempts bothered me more than some of the other flubs. Had we scored early on, it could have set a different, more confident tone for the game. Scoring first was one of Tripp's keys to the game, particularly, against this opponent. Let's do that tonight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw

Derailed75

Registered User
Jan 5, 2021
5,343
12,831
Danville
the boo birds happened after Hamilton stopped caring about infractions and basically begged the refs to call someone on him. He took a run at Point and then was jamming his stick at the puck for a couple of other skaters causing trips. It was all in the last 3-4 minutes of the game. No calls = fans booing.

Well they weren't calling any of the holds against Tampa. I swear at least 5 times on the broadcast you could see them clearly holding a Canes stick, also Foegele skated about 10 feet after a face off with Goodrows stick in his crotch
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeynjune

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,650
144,090
Bojangles Parking Lot
Well they weren't calling any of the holds against Tampa. I swear at least 5 times on the broadcast you could see them clearly holding a Canes stick, also Foegele skated about 10 feet after a face off with Goodrows stick in his crotch

The refs know coming into a game what the caliber of the teams will be, what's at stake, whether it's likely to have a playoff type atmosphere.

It was pretty clear last night that they wanted the players to decide the game at even strength. Both teams were getting away with silly stuff that couldn't have been overlooked, but just wasn't called. That's playoff hockey, and one of the major steps forward that the Canes need to take is to start winning games like that 5v5 rather than hanging around waiting for the PPs to show up.
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,765
28,538
Cary, NC
Well they weren't calling any of the holds against Tampa. I swear at least 5 times on the broadcast you could see them clearly holding a Canes stick, also Foegele skated about 10 feet after a face off with Goodrows stick in his crotch

At first, I thought Trocheck had a similar issue on the first goal. I think that was just a mutual tie-up that prevented him from using his stick in retrieving the puck for Svech's goal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw and DaveG

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
19,222
15,549
Toronto, ON
After giving such a suicide pass to Necas he should be jumping in and taking a beating he deserved for that pass. Good job.

Very entertaining game. I wish Hakanpää will lay someone out big time tonight. Although he does seem to have some trouble keeping up with the quick Tampa players. Point pretty much skated circles around him a couple of times. On the other hand - Point skates circles around anyone most of the time.

It was a very good hockey game.

It wasn’t a suicide pass. Killorn read it perfectly and was ready for when Gardiner did the no look cross ice pass to Necas as he was building up speed. They scouted our zone entries. That’s not Gards fault.
 

TomppaKoo

Registered User
Jan 27, 2021
1,576
1,835
It wasn’t a suicide pass. Killorn read it perfectly and was ready for when Gardiner did the no look cross ice pass to Necas as he was building up speed. They scouted our zone entries. That’s not Gards fault.

The reason Gardiner jumped on Killorn was that he understood the responsibility on that suicide pass he had made. No one who has not played hockey will not understand this so I will not even try to explain this to you any further.
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,667
47,344
You know you're winning an argument when you rely on the "Well, you've never played the game" stance
 

LakeLivin

Armchair Quarterback
Mar 11, 2016
5,126
15,133
North Carolina
The reason Gardiner jumped on Killorn was that he understood the responsibility on that suicide pass he had made. No one who has not played hockey will not understand this so I will not even try to explain this to you any further.

With the acknowledgement that English isn't my strong suit, I would need to create a flow chart in order to understand this sentence, lol. :huh:
 

TomppaKoo

Registered User
Jan 27, 2021
1,576
1,835
There are concepts in the game that you will not understand, if you never played the game. It is not about semantics or internet-heroism or trying to win an argument. Just giving an opinion based on personal experience of the game. With all due respect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Stranger

hockeynjune

Just a soft breeze
Sponsor
Jan 15, 2021
4,612
12,873
f8e4e3565654e83774ff78d336c7a1f5.jpg
 

TomppaKoo

Registered User
Jan 27, 2021
1,576
1,835
I’ve played hockey for 35 years and I still don’t know what you’re talking about

Well, in a non-contact pond hockey the responsibility of giving a bad pass near opposition blue line is not that dangerous, I guess. Whatever - I will not try to explain this any further to anyone. Peace.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad