I mean, he's the boss.Who the fock are you?
I mean, he's the boss.Who the fock are you?
You need to check out the music thread, @spiny norman is there all the time.Who the fock are you?
Never heard of him. From Winnipeg no less!I mean, he's the boss.
Bad enough reading all these shitty hockey takes; don't need to read the bad music takes as well.You need to check out the music thread, @spiny norman is there all the time.
Music brings everyone together don't you know.Never heard of him. From Winnipeg no less!
Bad enough reading all these shitty hockey takes; don't need to read the bad music takes as well.
Yes but it costs $90,000 to $100,000 to house one inmate in a correctional institution for one year in Canada. It would be cheaper to house them plus if the progress is positive, you might make them less reliant on social services, like police, CFS, mental health workers which, if $$ properly distributed, can lead to additional cost savings.If that's the big issue, then let's start making more use of those nice housing complexes in Headingley and Stony Mountain for all these poor, downtrodden downtownies.
As for the view, you're right. They should have built everything steeper. Maybe not old arena steep, but more than what we got. Not sure why they didn't. If anything, it allows for more seating within an under-sized footprint.
It's way more complicated than just housing. You take a meth addict, if you've ever heard some of the stories that go on in a meth house, you've got people using angle grinders to cut metal, people stripping bikes of all their metal parts, it's not like your average housing. To make money for meth. And in a state of pyschosis it could be even more dangerous. Or you have trap houses for women who do deeds for drugs. It's not pretty, and the simplistic solutions come from people in offices not so much people on the street. Tent villages are pretty functional units, minus the garbage, which is a municipal issue.Yes but it costs $90,000 to $100,000 to house one inmate in a correctional institution for one year in Canada. It would be cheaper to house them plus if the progress is positive, you might make them less reliant on social services, like police, CFS, mental health workers which, if $$ properly distributed, can lead to additional cost savings.
Dear Winnipeg blog is a blog I enjoy reading that approaches municipal issues in a non mainstream way but relies on facts, research and hard data. I encourage you to check it out.
I agree its more complicated than housing. But what I believe isn't complicated is there are solutions out there that can use funds more efficiently and effectively than paying police officers $100,000 after 5 years to be reactive and not proactive to crime or putting people in jail for the same annual cost. Part of it is housing. Part of it is gang awareness and keeping kids busy after school in middle/high school. Maybe a universal basic income. Maybe making social assistance contingent staying at the millenium library with presentations on temporary work. Homeless people should have to spend their days at the library trying to learn something they might be able to turn into a living. More officers might stop thefts at superstore and as part of the retail initiative but that strategy is missing the forest for the trees. I think the arena is in the right place. Portage place will get a makeover. Freepress recently had a special on Houston model approach towards homelessness but local organizations suggest they want their own approach. True north is doing the right things regarding the above and im sure its not without their self-interest. The city and province are lacking.It's way more complicated than just housing. You take a meth addict, if you've ever heard some of the stories that go on in a meth house, you've got people using angle grinders to cut metal, people stripping bikes of all their metal parts, it's not like your average housing. To make money for meth. And in a state of pyschosis it could be even more dangerous. Or you have trap houses for women who do deeds for drugs. It's not pretty, and the simplistic solutions come from people in offices not so much people on the street. Tent villages are pretty functional units, minus the garbage, which is a municipal issue.
I agree its more complicated than housing. But what I believe isn't complicated is there are solutions out there that can use funds more efficiently and effectively than paying police officers $100,000 after 5 years to be reactive and not proactive to crime or putting people in jail for the same annual cost. Part of it is housing. Part of it is gang awareness and keeping kids busy after school in middle/high school. Maybe a universal basic income. Maybe making social assistance contingent staying at the millenium library with presentations on temporary work. Homeless people should have to spend their days at the library trying to learn something they might be able to turn into a living. More officers might stop thefts at superstore and as part of the retail initiative but that strategy is missing the forest for the trees. I think the arena is in the right place. Portage place will get a makeover. Freepress recently had a special on Houston model approach towards homelessness but local organizations suggest they want their own approach. True north is doing the right things regarding the above and im sure its not without their self-interest. The city and province are lacking.
In 2011 there were 13,000 season tickets sold plus a waiting list capped at 8,000 in a smaller, poorer city than Winnipeg today.I don't think the problem with downtown is poverty, homelessness, addiction, etc. It's that Winnipeg has little for high paying corporate jobs that would draw people downtown to consume goods and services and dilute the vagrants. Fix the economy and the problem goes away. That's easier said than done though.
In 2011 there were 13,000 season tickets sold plus a waiting list capped at 8,000 in a smaller, poorer city than Winnipeg today.
Everything was dirt cheap in 2011. I think the Canadian dollar was actually above par with the USDI make together with my wife 50 percent more then I did in 2011 but for us it feels like we have way less money today then 2011
Sellout last night, awesome crowd for a Tuesday, love the energy in the building this season
Yep, food and especially housing have increased by more than 50% in that time.I make together with my wife 50 percent more then I did in 2011 but for us it feels like we have way less money today then 2011
Honestly the arena/True North Square is the only truly major improvement to downtown Winnipeg since The Forks was created over 30 years ago. I shudder to think of what downtown would be like without that there. Probably a boarded up Eatons filled with squatters, and the parking lot on Graham would still be there.
Yeah, it's impossible to imagine. Whatever additional revenue a new arena generates (regardless of where it's located) would be more than offset by the construction cost for a new venue. In some respects TNSE's timing was perfect for building a new arena... original construction cost was $144 million which was absolutely dirt cheap, it's basically the cost of an arena renovation project these days. A new rink would cost nearly a billion dollars today (and who knows how much in another 10-20 years), and it's not like the province is going to pick up the tab for it under current economic conditions.
Besides, the rink is only 20 years old. It's not like the Jets have outgrown it... there is no massive unmet demand for suites and club seats. Even if you assume the current rink will only last 50 years, that means replacement is still another 30 years away.
People often say this about arena lifespans, but I'm not sure I agree.CLC is 20 years old. It has never had a major reno but has had several lesser renos over the years. Life expectancy for NHL arenas appears to be about 40 years
Yeah you can't give up now. The demise of downtown started with the monstrosity that is Portage Place and razing well traveled businesses.
Stuff like this takes decades to fix, not years. They've made a good start with SHED and new residences. Now they have to keep building on that.
The real win would be public transit that doesnt suck like an e/w and n/s LRT
Not to mention meaningful police enforcement (cops out of cars), stronger vagrants laws and more resources for people in need.
It would be smart for the Jets to invest in these things because making downtown vibrant would be a huge financial win for them
Also, downtown has great bones. Lots of amazing architecture, historic sites and interesting places to go
People often say this about arena lifespans, but I'm not sure I agree.
The game changed with arenas back in the 90s, that's when suites, club seats and other premium sections became major fixtures of new buildings. So a lot of of the vintage post war arenas that didn't have those things were replaced around that time when many of them were maybe 30-40 years old.
But what has changed since the 90s that would justify new buildings? If an arena's lifespan was 40 years no matter what, you'd be hearing about all kinds of new buildings planned to replace the crop that went up in the 90s. But is anyone actually doing that? Not to my knowledge. The 90s arenas seem to be chugging along just fine. The only ones being replaced have some other kind of flaw, like the bad location in Ottawa.
Olympic Saddledome isn't being replaced because it's over 40. It's being replaced because it's a pre-90s building that doesn't have the revenue generating features common in newer buildings. CLC does not have that problem, so I don't think we should be expecting to attend a new arena's unveiling 20 years from now.
Ottawa's arena would basically be located past Headingly in terms of distance from the center of the city
I live by there and I would totally agree...