Ticket/Attendance Discussion: The Sequel

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,318
9,491
100% right.

There is some serious PTSD here from the 90s and it shows. This isn't the 90s... the issues that led to the demise of the Jets in the 90s are simply not an issue anymore.
Revenue Sharing and the Salary Cap didn't exist in the 90s. On the contrary the Jets paid the 2nd highest salary in the league their final year, after the Hawks tried to poach Tkachuk. But all the factors like the Canadian dollar, competing with new rinks with better luxury suite capacity, and crooked Winnipeg Enterprises don't exist now.

The Jets gate revenue isn't the worst in the league, I'm sure because of the price point they are in the bottom 10, but not bottom 5 in terms of gate receipts.

Probably top 20 in merchandising, which is revenue shared.

The investment by True North has made the team profitable with playoff appearances. They could cut their investment in salaries, but I think the league revenues are strong enough to keep the team competitive, in spite of being the smallest market, and unlikely to sell out on a regular basis.
 
Last edited:

jungles

Registered User
Sponsor
Jun 8, 2011
2,154
4,781
The crowd shots they chose for this story about attendance at 2:00 are ridiculous. Literally looks like they picked footage from when the game was over.

 

cg98

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
2,912
3,932
The investments they made downtown is a valid argument against selling/moving the team. However, the part about how the team rose in value from 170m to 1+ billion isn’t. If anything, it’s 800+ million in TNSE’s pockets as profit if they sell the team to a buyer that wants to move them based on the decision that Winnipeg can’t support an NHL team (frankly, based on last year and this year thus far, Winnipeg is giving plenty of reasons to the media to make this conclusion. Not saying it won’t turn around, but it’s not a good look.)
Terrible argument lol.

Net worth and assets increase with more revenue and profits. You dont earn near 10x your return of a $170mil investment if youre not earning profits in your market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog

Andy6

Court Jetster
Jun 3, 2011
2,134
750
Toronto, Ontario
Terrible argument lol.

Net worth and assets increase with more revenue and profits. You dont earn near 10x your return of a $170mil investment if youre not earning profits in your market.
The value of the Jets as an asset largely isn’t a reflection of their profitability in Winnipeg. If the NHL permanently forbade their relocation, no one would dream of paying a billion for them (maybe they would if there were the prospect of a large amount of free money from new NHL expansion fee payments, but not on the basis of what they are extracting from the local marketplace). A pro sports franchise is a very scarce commodity and the value would lie in how what they could produce for a new owner once moved to another city.
 

Joe Hallenback

Moderator
Mar 4, 2005
15,606
22,374
Ask me how many season tickets my corporation has for the Jets. Its a pretty huge one over 30 Billion worth and has a somewhat large presence in the province
 

Cypruss

Stand up for your beliefs.
Oct 18, 2018
1,401
3,000
LaSalle, Manitoba
I run a smaller branch in MB with about $18 million in revenues - part of a $400M overall Canadian company. Ask me how many times they have contacted my company about corporate ticket support. Hint: It is the same amount of times that they returned my calls back in 2016 (could have been 2017) when I reached out to them to get some tix...

Never mind.
Don't ask me.
 

JetsWillFly4Ever

Registered User
May 21, 2011
6,380
9,577
Winnipeg MB.
It's actually really not a terrible argument. The rise in value of the franchise is only realized when you sell it.
This is true for every ridiculously rich person in the world. Bezos Amazon stock, Musk Tesla stock. They don't actually have cash on hand, they would need to sell it.

They never will though, they can just take out virtually interest free loans against it instead.

The only way the Jets would be in trouble is if they get significantly cash flow negative for a long-period of time. They would likely cut the teams salary before this, I don't really think its ever going to be a realistic problem.
 

Gm0ney

Unicorns salient
Oct 12, 2011
14,918
14,382
Winnipeg
You're obviously not an investment advisor

"I'm going to sell the investment that has appreciated by 640% over 13 years because revenue is down a bit"

What would TNSE do with that $800M that would have the same return? Throw it in a GIC? Lol
Including the current USD exchange rate (since the CAD was at par in 2011), the value of the team is growing at about 17.5% per year.
 

Section 325

Registered User
Nov 5, 2014
1,383
3,582
Calgary, AB
It's actually really not a terrible argument. The rise in value of the franchise is only realized when you sell it.
And when you use it as leverage.

The value of the franchise most certainly comes in to play when considering all of the investments they have made in the surrounding community, like the enormous investment they are making in Portage Place.
 

Section 325

Registered User
Nov 5, 2014
1,383
3,582
Calgary, AB
I run a smaller branch in MB with about $18 million in revenues - part of a $400M overall Canadian company. Ask me how many times they have contacted my company about corporate ticket support. Hint: It is the same amount of times that they returned my calls back in 2016 (could have been 2017) when I reached out to them to get some tix...

Never mind.
Don't ask me.
I think an issue is that the business community got somewhat blocked out by the way tickets were distributed from the get go. The insurance company I used to work for has a huge presence in Western Canada but didn't have anything for the Moose before the Jets came. They didn't get priority because of that.

I know they tried and failed to get a private suite but those sold out before the general on sale. They needed to settle with only 4 season tickets and, from what I heard, they barely got those. The same company has two private suites in each Edmonton and Calgary.
 

Whis

Registered User
Jul 1, 2016
46
109
Attendance is clearly up this season. The hysteria can end. Jacob Stoller tried to rile people up by saying there were a ton of empty seats, 13k is a big improvement on the 11k we would have had for this game last season.
 

bustamente

Fraud Supporter
Jun 29, 2015
44,122
85,692
Fraud City MB
By capacity the Jets are doing better than a lot of teams, the team is doing better getting people to go to games but a team that is 12-1 should be playing in front of packed houses. TNSE still has a lot of work to do in the coming months for this year and the following ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luc Labelle

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,042
28,448
By capacity the Jets are doing better than a lot of teams, the team is doing better getting people to go to games but a team that is 12-1 should be playing in front of packed houses. TNSE still has a lot of work to do in the coming months for this year and the following ones.

The avg capacity of the teams they're ahead of (10 of them) is 18.5k with average attendees of 15.7k. The %s can swing a bit wilder in either direction for the Jets bc they're total capacity is small (10k fans is worth 65% to the Jets vs 54% to the 10 teams behind them)
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad