Adding Panarin, re-signing Hayes and Zucc, doesn't make us cup contenders.
Don’t forget Karlsson.
Adding Panarin, re-signing Hayes and Zucc, doesn't make us cup contenders.
We can't just throw money at every problem! RangerBoy, c'mon!Don’t forget Karlsson.
Everything you're saying here is the opposite of David Quinn, so I'm not sure what you're on about.Oy, vey. Ok. I'll bite. What would a "real" coach do? Oh, wait. I know. A real coach would have benched Staal immediately. But you know, reality is different here, so there is no way that a move like that would have had repercussions in the locker room. What else? Oh, wait. I know. There would simply not be any accountability and players like ADA or Buch would have never been scratched. But you know, reality is different here so I am sure that there would be absolutely no feelings of entitlement or the need to work hard and do what your coach demands in order to be in the line up. What else? Oh, wait. I know. The starting line up would be entirely dictated by Corsi and /60.
I think, at best, this would've been exactly what Gorton talked about last season --- the dreaded middle.
McD would still be forced to be a first pairing defenseman, Howden isn't here, and I'm not sure the old guard buys into the system as easily.
Miller and Lundkvist aren't in the system and depending on how far back we want to go, we can also scratch Andersson and ADA.
I think you're talking about a whole different set of problems, with very little in the way of the future at this moment.
So yeah, maybe we're a bubble playoff team this season. And then what?
Also, can they send Chytil down? It was to my understanding after he played 9 or 10 games (can't remember the number) that they would not be able to send him down without losing him for the season... can someone verify that or correct me on that?
Chytil had 31 points in 46 AHL games. That's very far from proving you're too good for the league.Yeah people taking issue with not sending Chytil down is silly to me. Either he stays in the NHL whole year or goes down to AHL, proves he’s too good for that league (which I think he already has), comes back up at some point and plays more than 9 games anyway. Keep him up and let him develop the other areas of his game, he’s an incredibly smart player, you don’t lose that based on usage.
I think the calls that Quinn is mismanaging Chytil are premature given his handling of ADA, Buchnevich, and Pionk (which many objected to) appears to be working out.
Chytil had 31 points in 46 AHL games. That's very far from proving you're too good for the league.
Chytil should be in the AHL. Regarding the way he's being handled, it sure seems like Quinn feels the same way. Something a little strange is going on with management here. Not sure why he's being forced to stay up, especially with Howden's emergence and a logjam at center with Hayes/Z.
By now, yes, the roster would have run its course anyway.
We had a couple of seasons where we could have been a lot better than the middle.
It speaks volumes that Quinn is getting slightly better results out of this roster than AV got coming off of a Presidents Trophy.
Maybe we should have torn it down three years ago, but if you're going to go for it, go for it.
Instead, we spent a couple of years in the dreaded middle with a good roster and a coach who had lost his mind.
2016 and 2017 were such a waste. They set themselves back for what they're trying to do now and they never had a real chance at it.
I'm glad they're not on the bubble anymore but they put themselves in that position tethering the roster to AV.
I do not necessarily disagree. I think that I would wait to see if he can adapt to the role. However, if it is apparent that he is not and the best value is to trade him now, then go ahead and pull the trigger.
How so? Looks to me like that is exactly what happened.Everything you're saying here is the opposite of David Quinn, so I'm not sure what you're on about.
Staal got benched? When was this?How so? Looks to me like that is exactly what happened.
This team has been exactly what they have been in years past solely because of Henke's play. In the past, they got much further than they should have solely because of his play. Now, they do not appear to be as bad as they are because of his play.While there is an improvement defensively, slight improvement, this team is still bad defensively. The reason the team is 6-7-1 is because Lundqvist has played extremely well to start the season.
Yes, but that has nothing to do with him.I will give Quinn credit in that he has this group trying harder than they did last year (as can be seen mildly in advanced statistics). BUT, they're clearly a bad team.
The benchings were not due to someone not being physical enough. The benchings were due to the the players not doing what was demanded of them. Where is the problem? That is what accountability is. What are you proposing? That lazy play be rewarded with top ice time if you are a "skill" player?I will openly say I do not like him as a coach for how he manages the roster. I know there are MANY Quinn advocates on here who have already dismissed what I said, and I'm fine with that. I've never been in the crowd that "effort" wins games. Effort/talent wins games, and we have lost many games this season outworking the other team only to not get on the scoreboard. Quinn hasn't found that balance yet, and he will bench players who he deems not putting in the "effort" or being physical enough. And for a team that cannot score goals, it's not a practical approach in my opinion. This isn't a team like the Jets where they can afford to send Laine down to the 4th line to send a message. We don't have the talent to do that.
To what do you point as evidence for this?I also don't see him on the same page as Gorton, which is a problem.
It sounds like your main problem with him is him holding players accountable. It sounds like you believe that players with skill should get special privileges and their ice time in more of an entitlement than an earning.If Lundqvist/Georgiev were average in each of their starts, this team might have 3-wins right now (I know, goaltending is part of the team). I get that they're not supposed to be a good team, and that they're rebuilding, but I cannot get behind his decisions.
He can be sent down. The 9 games at the NHL level is what burns a year off eligibilityAlso, can they send Chytil down? It was to my understanding after he played 9 or 10 games (can't remember the number) that they would not be able to send him down without losing him for the season... can someone verify that or correct me on that?
Who said anything about Staal getting benched? I laid out multiple times that a rookie coach is not going to embarrass the team's well-respected elder statesman at the beginning of the season. He would not cause locker room issues that way and wisely so.Staal got benched? When was this?
You did.Who said anything about Staal getting benched? I laid out multiple times that a rookie coach is not going to embarrass the team's well-respected elder statesman at the beginning of the season. He would not cause locker room issues that way and wisely so.
More likely than ever that both Zucc and Hayes will get an extension. Trade is the last option.
Yes, in 20-25 games. But thanks for reading all the way throughYou did.