I cant believe some of the nonsense being spewed on the main board.
I cant believe some of the nonsense being spewed on the main board.
No... just avoid it.
I cant believe some of the nonsense being spewed on the main board.
I cant believe some of the nonsense being spewed on the main board.
And common law marriage in Colorado isn't just an automatic thing. Just living with your girlfriend/boyfriend for a certain amount of time isn't enough for it to be a common law marriage, regardless of what some people think.
I'd still like that poster to come back and answer my questions.
They're not married and have only been dating one another for a year, surely she wouldn't be given the same options, such as alimony, percentage of income, etc. that usually goes along with the divorce of a married couple.
I cant believe some of the nonsense being spewed on the main board.
Yeah, first I was reading the Thread on the mainboard as I'm not an Avs Fan. But soon I realised that there are some weird posts and so I decided to visit the Colorado Forum in hope that there is a better conversation ongoing. Luckily, I was not disappointed.
I also have some questions regarding this case. If Varlamov will be charged for the things claimed by the woman and the judgement takes for example until March. Will he be able to participate in the Olympics? I would guess he wouldn't be allowed to leave the country, but I really have no idea.
Another question I have is regarding suspension. If the Avs or the NHL would decide to suspend him, will he get paid without playing? Thats how these suspension works in my home country. And I also assume that his salary would still count against the cap, or is this wrong?
This aren't really important question regarding this case, but I would like to know the answer to them
"As we speak, we have different info that makes us believe we should trust him," Roy said.
This was in some article Kiszla posted
I'd still like that poster to come back and answer my questions.
They're not married and have only been dating one another for a year, surely she wouldn't be given the same options, such as alimony, percentage of income, etc. that usually goes along with the divorce of a married couple.
Kiszla completely changed his tune in that new article. He said he talked about why on a radio show, I'll have to listen to it later when I get home.
Also Friedman said he agrees with the Avs supporting Varly.
Here is a link to the Kiszla article and video where he talks about what he heard from Roy and Varlamov yesterday.
http://www.denverpost.com/kiszla/ci_24462999/roy-putting-trust-faith-varlamov
Interestingly, Kiszla was asked if he believed Von Miller's claim of innocence last summer in comparison to if he believed Varlamov's claim of innocence now. Kiszla said, based on face to face conversations, he thought Miller was lying at the time, and that Varlamov is telling the truth now.
Kiszla is a master of knowing when you're lying. Should have been a cop.
Good info, but Avalanche management and the sports media are probably the LEAST impartial folks in this.
The DA's decision to progress this will tell a lot about the evidence. It's a high profile case and the cost will probably be substantial to pursue. I still want to hear some facts before I make any judgements. So much heresay in this thing.