Weltschmerz
Front Running Fan
- Apr 22, 2007
- 5,314
- 3,489
Not sure ducks fans are happy right now.
Not sure ducks fans are happy right now.
In MTL they are saying it's the coaches fault too....oh waitDucks fans are saying it's the coaches fault tho and everyone is wondering why they regressed too
typical twitter case of making a guy up and then getting angry at that made up guy
Not gonna comment on trades. But 1 thing they could have absolutely done better, was not the value of our vets.Again, I want to know what realistically could have been done to make this team better now.
You reference Toffoli and Lekhonen, but I really don't see either of these players moving the needle right now. Toffoli is currently on the Sharks, one of our lottery rivals this season. Lekhonen is a nice piece, but I'm not convinced we get Colorado's version without having a MacKinnon on our team. We saw Lek on our club, he was your standard middle 6 player with the habs.
You also mention the Newhook trade. Okay, so we dont make the trade and keep the picks. Are the habs any better? What are those picks doing right now?
I just want to realistically know what could have been done? Okay, we don';t trade for Dach, Newhook, and keep Toffolli and Lekhonen?
So are the habs that much better with Romanov, Lekhonen, Toffolli, and the Newhook picks? I really really doubt it. If so, then there is an argument to be made that trading those players were crucial in collecting three back-to-back top 5 picks, which in the grand scheme of things is far more important than retaining those three players.
Short of trading for a top line centre and #1 D man, I don't see what other combo of available moves make the habs better today and future.
Last year when I said that rebuilding was more than just draft picks and that it was a combination of picks, trades, FA, etc I got nailed to the wall by the tankers, That's what it takes to build a team in real life, not HF fantasy of finishing last every year, like it or not.
Go look up the 2019 draft class...
9th & 10th leading scorers.
Then go look at 2018, 2017, 2016.
That's why patience is a necessary part of the rebuild process.
If you don't agree with, or have the patience for a rebuild focused on building via the draft and strategic bets on top end first round talent, thats fine...
If you can't understand what the Habs are doing, perhaps remove the blinders
I’ll write it again because you didn’t catch it:Again, I want to know what realistically could have been done to make this team better now.
You reference Toffoli and Lekhonen, but I really don't see either of these players moving the needle right now. Toffoli is currently on the Sharks, one of our lottery rivals this season. Lekhonen is a nice piece, but I'm not convinced we get Colorado's version without having a MacKinnon on our team. We saw Lek on our club, he was your standard middle 6 player with the habs.
You also mention the Newhook trade. Okay, so we dont make the trade and keep the picks. Are the habs any better? What are those picks doing right now?
I just want to realistically know what could have been done? Okay, we don';t trade for Dach, Newhook, and keep Toffolli and Lekhonen?
So are the habs that much better with Romanov, Lekhonen, Toffolli, and the Newhook picks? I really really doubt it. If so, then there is an argument to be made that trading those players were crucial in collecting three back-to-back top 5 picks, which in the grand scheme of things is far more important than retaining those three players.
Short of trading for a top line centre and #1 D man, I don't see what other combo of available moves make the habs better today and future.
I don't see those at shortcuts though. The team didn't trade for 30 year old players. They traded for two 21 year olds with a lot of runway in terms of development. I don't see how acquiring two prospects that need work a shortcut.I’ll write it again because you didn’t catch it:
What if you’re plenty patient and willing to rebuild but you don’t agree with the shortcuts (Dach, Newhook) and non-trades (Anderson, Matheson)?
Shortcuts to relevancy and competitiveness. Trading future for present. Why else would you trade a 18year old (draftee) for a 21 year old who’s getting cut loose by his team?I don't see those at shortcuts though. The team didn't trade for 30 year old players. They traded for two 21 year olds with a lot of runway in terms of development. I don't see how acquiring two prospects that need work a shortcut.
How is retaining Matheson a shortcut? It's a shortcut to what exactly?
Anderson is the most unconsequential player.
I didn't expect team to fall off like this. Major oversight on my part. Marty struggled more than I expected. I am surprised but looking back I can see how it happened.Next step ?: Having a NHL level coaching staff.
Stamkos's D+6 year Tampa ended up with 3rd OA, Drouin.Which SC winner was bottom 5 team when their 1C was in his D+8, their goal scorer in his D+6, and two additional top 6 players in their D+6 as well, oh and one of the Dman presented as being top 2 in his D+5 ?
If you don t understand the Habs are supposed to be much more advanced than the likes of SJS, CHI, CBJ, please remove the blinders…
Jeff O'Neill along with all other Toronto broadcasters and reporters no nothing about Montreal ....they do not watch the games.O-Dog on Hutson: ‘I would put him in Laval right now’ - Video - TSN
Bryan Hayes, Jeff O’Neill and Jamie McLennan are joined by TSN Hockey Insider Chris Johnston to discuss the defensive struggles for the Montreal Canadiens, Lane Hutson’s role on the team and should he be playing games in the AHL rather than the NHL.www.tsn.ca
O-Dog on Hutson: ‘I would put him in Laval right now’ - Video - TSN
Bryan Hayes, Jeff O’Neill and Jamie McLennan are joined by TSN Hockey Insider Chris Johnston to discuss the defensive struggles for the Montreal Canadiens, Lane Hutson’s role on the team and should he be playing games in the AHL rather than the NHL.www.tsn.ca
MacKinnon after D+4 season was being talked about as a “1OA bust”Stamkos's D+6 year Tampa ended up with 3rd OA, Drouin.
Landeskog's D+7 year Colorado ended up with 4th OA, Makar.
And let's not pretend like we are years into our rebuild, our rebuild started with Slaf, and it's D+3.
It does help a lot if you end you drafting one or two semi generational players.Stamkos's D+6 year Tampa ended up with 3rd OA, Drouin.
Landeskog's D+7 year Colorado ended up with 4th OA, Makar.
And let's not pretend like we are years into our rebuild, our rebuild started with Slaf, and it's D+3.
Semi generational would imply that caliber player is available once in 10-15 yearsIt does help a lot if you end you drafting one or two semi generational players.
Not sure about that. Impactful offensively absoluely, defensively he's terrible and that's ok at this point. The whole team is terrible lol.Guy is firmly in the top 3 conversation for the Calder and might be the most impactful player on the entire team right now. Stupid take. O'Dog sucks.
Yeah... that's a dumb take from O'Neil.Not sure about that. Impactful offensively absoluely, defensively he's terrible and that's ok at this point. The whole team is terrible lol.
I believe the point O'Dog was trying to make is if we keep sliding and everything goes completely south, do you get him away from the chaos and go win in Laval to save his brain. My take on Hutson, given his makeup, is losing won't factor in his compete and/or effort level and won't set him back.
Not sure about that. Impactful offensively absoluely, defensively he's terrible and that's ok at this point. The whole team is terrible lol.
I believe the point O'Dog was trying to make is if we keep sliding and everything goes completely south, do you get him away from the chaos and go win in Laval to save his brain. My take on Hutson, given his makeup, is losing won't factor in his compete and/or effort level and won't set him back.