Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 15,615
- 6,568
5 years from now when we finally enter year 3 of the rebuild we should be ready to compete
We were close to finish 30th in the standings
What did overachieve?
I understand that playing hockey when playoffs are out of the horizon is not the same and some teams take you less seriously but man except Suzuki production , idk about that
Whatever happened to “natural growth”?76 points, all those 1 goal losses. Maybe their true worth was less than that. They had 68 the season before and didn't change the lineup much inbetween.
It's not about winning, it's how they are playing. They played much better (structured, positionally) in the last 40 games of last season than they are doing right now.76 points, all those 1 goal losses. Maybe their true worth was less than that. They had 68 the season before and didn't change the lineup much inbetween.
I’m beginning to think some people just like losing and vaguely hoping for a better tomorrow. Nothing else explains the fans’ ambivalence to the regression.5 years from now when we finally enter year 3 of the rebuild we should be ready to compete
Devil have been rebuilding for 4, they're competing in year 4.26-27. At least 5 years for a rebuild. Usually it takes 7. We are year 3.
Devil have been rebuilding for 4, they're competing in year 4.
I'm sorry, are you confused on your own criterias? Fitzgerald came in in 2020. Before that Shero added vets like Subban, acquired Hamilton, Tatar, etc.View attachment 927786
Not even close to true. They've been bad since 2012-2013 and have yet to make the playoffs in back to back years.
Whatever happened to “natural growth”?
A young lineup + 2 years is expected to be less immature, more capable of showing consistency, more athletic, etc.
If they can’t improve their true worth over two years… what the fk are we doing here
not really with a 1C and 1D our team would be much betterNo. We need much more, unfortunately.
Give me 1 Andersson and 1 Hagens and we are ok.not really with a 1C and 1D our team would be much better
Slafkovsky - 1C - Demidov
Caufield - Suzuki - Laine
Newhook - Dach - Gallagher
Roy - Evans - Heinemen
Guhle - 1D
Hutson - Reinbacher
Struble/Xhekaj - Mailloux
It's not about winning, it's how they are playing. They played much better (structured, positionally) in the last 40 games of last season than they are doing right now.
They are playing like they forgot everything they learned last year.
They are playing frustrated, with no confidence, etc.
There is something that is bothering them enough to mind screw the entire line-up outside of Evans and Gally (and maybe Andy). And I don't think it's Laine/Reinbacher injuries.
not really with a 1C and 1D our team would be much better
Slafkovsky - 1C - Demidov
Caufield - Suzuki - Laine
Newhook - Dach - Gallagher
Roy - Evans - Heinemen
Guhle - 1D
Hutson - Reinbacher
Struble/Xhekaj - Mailloux
I think it's wishful thinking to be honest. I don't recall seeing many teams going from bottom 5 to conference finalists.
Rebuilding is not a magic process. Even when you think you have all the pieces, they need to progress and every player has his own progression curve.
I agree we still need to draft high this next draft. But what of next season? What are your expectations?
We have a legit chance to be already out of contention by american thanksgiving!
Ducharme level season!
Im good with it
Yep. Progression in net is 80% depending on our D though. So i would say our priority should definitely be on rounding up our D.I know its unrealistic to go from bottom 5 to conference finals, but what I mean is having a chance to compete in the playoffs, not being the statistical favourites to reach the finals.
This is the last year that I'd like to be a bottom feeder. If we have no major changes in net or on defense I'd expect to be bottom 10. We're not going to score ourselves into the playoffs.
We're still not at Ducharme level. The team post-finals, played ,250 under Ducharme. MSL had them playing between ,350 and ,450 since he came in. We're at ,357 right now.
I'm sorry, are you confused on your own criterias? Fitzgerald came in in 2020. Before that Shero added vets like Subban, acquired Hamilton, Tatar, etc.
You can't have it both ways, mon chéri.
Top 4 RD would help stabilize things.Yep. Progression in net is 80% depending on our D though. So i would say our priority should definitely be on rounding up our D.
It's been almost 3 years i've been saying we are building our D the wrong way. That we eventually would lack the defensive side. And i definitely don't think i was wrong. While people were really high on Mailloux and almost calling Reinbacher a bust, i was saying Reinbacher would probably be the most important piece of our D because of all our prospects, he is the only one that can eventually be elite defensively. I think Guhle will be very good and Hutson will be ok but the rest is mediocre at best.
And i hope our D becomes stable before we bring Fowler in because i don't want him to feel like he is our saviour while being a rookie.
5 years from now when we finally enter year 3 of the rebuild we should be ready to compete
Just beginning? You’ve been screaming this for years.I’m beginning to think some people just like losing and vaguely hoping for a better tomorrow.
I can’t think of too many posters who wanted us to deliberately tank this year. I think most hoped - and many expected- improvement.Nothing else explains the fans’ ambivalence to the regression.
Don’t scream for a rebuild if you can’t handle it when it arrives.Come on now, you need to be more patient than that, progression is not lenear and rebuilds take time you know
Top 4 RD would help stabilize things.