The state of the Habs Rebuild - The Next step

What note you give to Kent Hughes' Rebuild? ?

  • A

    Votes: 205 54.4%
  • B

    Votes: 135 35.8%
  • C

    Votes: 32 8.5%
  • D

    Votes: 3 0.8%
  • E

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • F

    Votes: 4 1.1%

  • Total voters
    377

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,511
6,137
I think you're a great poster but there's some ignorance in this post.

Tampa Bay never rebuilt. They kept everyone and the little they did trade they either re-signed in the same off-season to a long-term deal (Prospal) or to try and get a starting goalie and depth (Richards for Smith and Jokinen).

Pittsburgh was on the verge of bankruptcy.

Colorado are a bit of an odd one. They went half-rebuild/half-compete and were in the abyss for roughly ten years.
Regardless of whether you want to classify it as a rebuild or tanking or scorched earth or any other term is irrelevant to the point that it takes a lot of time to climb out of the basement and expecting us to do it quicker then pretty much every other successful basement to cup team is a case of fans being impatient and not understanding what rebuilding actually entails.
 

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
26,932
15,936
Montreal, QC
Regardless of whether you want to classify it as a rebuild or tanking or scorched earth or any other term is irrelevant to the point that it takes a lot of time to climb out of the basement and expecting us to do it quicker then pretty much every other successful basement to cup team is a case of fans being impatient and not understanding what rebuilding actually entails.

That's the point, TB drafted Stamkos in '08 and were in the Conference Finals in '11 after acquiring grizzled vet Dwayne Roloson mid-year. Then they missed a couple of times again. They never sold anyone.

There's no point in bringing them up. They didn't do anything like us at all. That matters. They're not an example. They were always trying to compete. Much like the Blackhawks in the 00s.
 

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,511
6,137
But what about that winning culture that was so important when we should have been tanking harder?
I'm sorry but you can't have it both ways...
Many of those teams also didn't try to tank harder, Tampa for example kept Lecavalier and St-Louis while rebuilding with Stamkos and Hedman. Chicago was making trades for guys like Havlat and signing the top UFAs at the time like Khavibuhlin even while going through the rebuild.

That's the point, TB drafted Stamkos in '08 and were in the Conference Finals in '11 after acquiring grizzled vet Dwayne Roloson mid-year. Then they missed a couple of times again. They never sold anyone.

There's no point in bringing them up. They didn't do anything like us at all. That matters. They're not an example. They were always trying to compete. Much like the Blackhawks in the 00s.
And then they ended up back in the basement in the two years after that. Which shows that rebuilds take time, aren't linear, and there will be ups and downs where it seems the team seems to regress before they figure it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spring in Fialta

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
26,932
15,936
Montreal, QC
The only hard tanks that won the Cup post-lockout are Pittsburgh and Washington.

Many of those teams also didn't try to tank harder, Tampa for example kept Lecavalier and St-Louis while rebuilding with Stamkos and Hedman. Chicago was making trades for guys like Havlat and signing the top UFAs at the time like Khavibuhlin even while going through the rebuild.


And then they ended up back in the basement in the two years after that. Which shows that rebuilds take time, aren't linear, and there will be ups and downs where it seems the team seems to regress before they figure it out.

For sure but I'll take a Conference final (/s) over another season in the dumps (that management is actively trying to get out of). If the year looks like the first 7 games, it's a massive failure. Period. Injuries are an absolute bitch so I won't call for anyone's head but the honeymoon needs to end. We need to see serious improvement. Our apex four years in can't be 22-23 with a worse year following that. That's alarming.
 

DAChampion

Registered User
May 28, 2011
30,198
21,648
I assume that HuGO don't want to thank the season, and that they'd be likely to trade for help if this keeps up.
 

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
42,107
39,048
Montreal
Many of those teams also didn't try to tank harder, Tampa for example kept Lecavalier and St-Louis while rebuilding with Stamkos and Hedman. Chicago was making trades for guys like Havlat and signing the top UFAs at the time like Khavibuhlin even while going through the rebuild.
I get what you are saying but we have not made any significant strides to fall back on since Day 1 of the rebuild.
It's easy to see it happens but take New Jersey for example they played a shitload of one goal games the year prior to breaking through.
That they fell back the next season is irrelevant to the fact that they broke through.

I was all in for 2 years of complete desolation no matter what but in year two we started winning too many games in a hugely impactful draft.
I bought into the kool aid that a winning culture was more important for a young team despite feeling it was utter BS.
Not having players like Lecavalier and St Louis in the fold makes it worse not better.
So now if we fall back to the Sharks level of ineptitude how will that be looked on as okay?
 

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,511
6,137
The only hard tanks that won the Cup post-lockout are Pittsburgh and Washington.



For sure but I'll take a Conference final (/s) over another season in the dumps (that management is actively trying to get out of). If the year looks like the first 7 games, it's a massive failure. Period. Injuries are an absolute bitch so I won't call for anyone's head but the honeymoon needs to end. We need to see serious improvement. Our apex four years in can't be 22-23 with a worse year following that. That's alarming.
We all would love to see big steps being taken by players and the team, but no a step back isn't some massive failure it's a completely normal part of development and progress. Hughes even talked about how we might see a step back and not to panic when talking about expectations for Slafkovsky this season, and the same is true for the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz

Grate n Colorful Oz

The Hutson Hawk
Jun 12, 2007
35,919
33,754
Hockey Mecca
I assume that HuGO don't want to thank the season, and that they'd be likely to trade for help if this keeps up.

They've stated they are always looking to get better, but at the right price, for the right player, without impeding on their long term plans, which is slowly, but surely, getting better. In other words, they won't be looking for quick easy fixes that would jeapordize their commitment to long term building.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Spring in Fialta

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
26,932
15,936
Montreal, QC
We all would love to see big steps being taken by players and the team, but no a step back isn't some massive failure it's a completely normal part of development and progress. Hughes even talked about how we might see a step back and not to panic when talking about expectations for Slafkovsky this season, and the same is true for the team.

Hard disagree from me. The team hasn't shown anywhere near enough potential that a step-back isn't a problem. No way.

They've stated they are always looking to get better, but at the right price, for the right player, without impeding on their long term plans, which is slowly, but surely, getting better. In other words, they won't be looking for quick easy fixes that would jeapordize their commitment to long term building.

Which is what we hear all the time from every rebuilding club in the league. It's in page 11 of the GM's manual to rebuilding. Means absolutely nothing.

'I would love to get better today all the while building a long-term project'

Yeah, who doesn't?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad