- Jan 18, 2022
- 8,274
- 12,643
Oh please. You make it seem like people are showing up to your work and attacking you. You’re getting outed on a public forum of which you voluntarily participated in. You argued incessantly about this topic and how right you were. Now you rightfully get called out for being wrong and impatient and you’re the victim? Please. You couldn’t even get through your sad sappy post without taking a shot at the player yet again. Cry me a river.
Maybe you can ask the forum volunteer why I couldn't comment but I didn't run off whatsoever. In fact I had written a comment praising Slafkovsky right when I realised I couldn't publish it. But putting the whole thing together, and with the latent fury many of you clearly carry, it's clear my presence was not welcome -- so I respect that. And why shouldn't I? Dredging my comments on another platform back into HFBoards and taking shots when I'm not around is a You problem, though. I don't have any interest in interacting with people who don't want to interact with me. It isn't sappy of me to hope you can understand that.Hey guys, I take issue with anyone calling me a coward.
Sure, I've incessantly made posts about Slaf while he was struggling.
Sure, I ran away when he was doing good.
Sure, I come back as he's slumping.
But truly, all of you are toxic !
As for Slafkovsky, he's not scoring at his crazy pace but he's already proven he's much better than before. That's growth which proves he belongs in the NHL. It doesn't matter what he does from this point to the end of the season, he has a lot more upon which to build for the season after. Plenty to look forward.
I think there's plenty to discuss outside of Slafkovsky. While he's being a bit uh, logarithmic rather than parabolic right now, I don't think there's any chance anyone reasonable would argue he doesn't belong in the NHL. His growth has been incredible, he is on track to do important things in the NHL. Chapeau to you and your vision (or was it blind faith?).Hope for more debate on other subject and hopefully with nothing going into this type of disproportionate response.