Yikes, when trying to make an argument, using the main board's opinion is maybe not the way to go.
What I find interesting is that this board has been bombarded for the last several years with posts on how the Rangers always have to be the smartest in the room. Never go with the "consensus". They reached on Andersson, they reached on Kratsov, etc etc.
Now the facts are if there is a "consensus" from the pro drafting services it's been Hughes 1, Kakko 2 for the past two years. As recently as like a month ago, Bob McKenzie updated his list from 10 nhl scouts and all picked Hughes no 1 overall Kakko. A fast look at the various latest lists still have Hughes 1, Kakko 2.
But now the "consensus" is wrong this time. It's biased. Wonder why a lot of Rangers' fans feel that way?
Note: make no bones about it, I love Kakko and Hughes and would be happy with either as a huge piece to the Rangers puzzle. I am also resigned to the fact that one is going to the Devils but as we've seen with these great players, they can't make a team by themselves. That's why I refuse to look at either as the savor of the Rangers franchise.