I thought it was 3-0, or maybe that’s just soccer?Does the NHL have a walkover rule?... Like if for some reason if a team doesn't show up or can't field a minimal roster a 6-0 result (or something like that) gets assigned to the game. If so, at this point the Sharks should just hang a "Out for Lunch" sign on the front door and take the rest of the year off.
Perhaps it's the prospect of the current season being historically bad creating recency bias, but it feels like the Sharks are in danger of being one of those organizations that fall into the abyss and go yeeears without even sorta challenging for playoff spot.
Not a big deal this year...The crazy part is they could wind up sucking this bad only to lose the draft lottery like Columbus and Detroit have.
Guy decided to reward his players with contracts and NMCs that didn’t make sense and the team is paying the price. At least EK65’s Norris season made it so you could trade him.Non rising cap screwed the sharks in particular. As did the shocking near instant decline of Vlasic from leagues best shutdown to candidate for worst contact in the league. Similar shocking near instant decline of Martin Jones, who cost a 1st and now just eats cap. Paying another first to let pavelski go for Kane. EK65 Norris season ruining the tank in a good draft year. Hertl getting an 8 year deal even though it doesn't fit our window at all. Carrying 2.7M of burns and getting peanuts back.
DW was a good GM but the decisions made late in his tenure are leading to this now.
Just proves how necessary puck moving defensemen are to gain possession in the d-zone and transition to offence. Karlsson was IT last year, now they have no one who can generate plays from the backend or transition to offence to help out their forwards.On paper our defense is the worst iced that I can ever remember since watching hockey. Literally not a single player that would be on anything higher than the 3rd pairing on any other team, and several that probably should not even be in the NHL at all.
Assembling this roster, the only justice is if they pick 3rd overall.
Oh that's been guaranteed for years as it is. I don't expect to sniff the playoffs until 2028, maybe 2027 if everything goes right, and quite easily 2029.Perhaps it's the prospect of the current season being historically bad creating recency bias, but it feels like the Sharks are in danger of being one of those organizations that fall into the abyss and go yeeears without even sorta challenging for playoff spot.
I dislike tanking ala Chicago/Pittsburgh/Edmonton so in principle I agree.Assembling this roster, the only justice is if they pick 3rd overall.
This is actually our worst case because the penguins 1st is ours but top 10 protected
Sharks would get the Penguins unprotected 25 pick then though right?
The Seals actually had some very decent results early on, repeatedly holding their own against the Habs and the Bruins powerhouse teams among others.Just saw the last result.
god damn this is worse than the Golden seals. This is oakland seals bad.
Wait no. i looked it up. They did not loose like this back then.
Ok yes the lost in 71 against the canucks 5:11 and against the rangers with 1:12.
But that were the golden seals.
So yes this is golden seals bad.
![]()
1974-75 California Golden Seals Schedule | Hockey-Reference.com
Check out the latest California Golden Seals Schedule and Results for regular season, playoffs and more on Hockey-Reference.comwww.hockey-reference.com
This team would be bad in the 70s. The freaking 70s.
They're already in year 5 of not coming close to challenging for a playoff spot, the problem is the first 3.5 of those years were by accidentPerhaps it's the prospect of the current season being historically bad creating recency bias, but it feels like the Sharks are in danger of being one of those organizations that fall into the abyss and go yeeears without even sorta challenging for playoff spot.