ilmaveivimessias
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2011
- 8
- 0
Id like to see some more ilmaveivim (latrappe goals) from him since he seems to have a pretty good success rate with them.
I'm not flaming anybody, let alone Granlund. He is a terrific hockey player and if he only could skate he would actually be a top 10 player in the world. He is rather good even without skating. So, he is quite good all said and done. I just pointed out that the WJC has shown that he still struggles against NA teams and seems to have difficulties to play his game with less time and space. It's easy to see that larger ice surface suits him way better. Saying all these things is not flaming but just commenting obvious facts. He may be a good NHLer one day but he would certainly be even better if he had that extra second allowed by big rink game. Something will be missing in his game in the NHL, that's for sure.
What is that something? None of the scouts saw it. The only knock on him was his size, otherwize he would have gone top 3. You don't pick a player that small in top 10 if you think he might lack a little something. AND Do not answer with something about his skating!
He is a very agile skater and he has improved his speed every year.
His stance is great. Won't be pushed around.
Granlund is without a doubt a high IQ player. However, his speed, lack of strength along the wall, and pass first mentality have been evident throughout the WJC. He seems to be too intelligent for his teammates but is unable to dominate on his own.
I put more weight into the WC and FEL but it is apparent that he is better on big ice with time and space. We all no that time and space is limited in the NHL. I am not suggesting that he is a bust or worried that he will fail but I do think it will take some time to adapt. In other words, I don't think he is going to come over and light it up right away. So be patient...he is too smart to be a bust...but don't be surprised if he takes awhile to learn the NA game.
Keep chewing on your ******** *******.He has improved his speed but doesn't create scoring chances by skating/speed. He really could use a little bit more explosiviness to get away from defenders. Now hes been shut down relatively easily at the WJC. His creativity seems to be diminished as the ice surface's been diminished. As he must play more straightforward and simpler game in the NHL it will lose part of its finesse and creativity. And I think this is partly due to his lack of explosiviness. If he could dodge the defenders more effectively it would give him more roome to operate also in small rink. He must give up some subtleties of his game because it's basically big rink hockey he's playing there, holding on the puck long too etc.
Or in the words of Jbcraig:
I don't know what he means by "his speed" though (lack of it?).
Jesus can walk on water but Granlund can swim through land.
Keep chewing on your ******** *******.
Just saying one extra gear wouldn't hurt him. Hope he finds it during off season.
And while he hasn't been that impressive at the WJC yet (then again, WHO has been...?) he is nevertheless in top10 in scoring. So, overall hes been playing quite well.
Leads tournament in scoring now with 2+9![]()
And really, he's only been playing on his own level for the last two periods of this tournament.
Pejorative Slured ****. Hes been looking sloppy and lazy there, as if he wasn't even trying his best. Yet he leads the scoring race. Somehow he always racks up points. Amazing player. And much better than he looks-.
Not you again.
Yes he is better than he has played this tourny but he can't do it all, he has passed to Pulkkinen 5 open nets per game, if he had a real goal scorer beside him he might have something like 15-16 assists.
He should shoot more tho.
In my limited viewing of him during the tournament his skills remind me of Hemsky. Great stick handling and can make incredible passes but tends to hold onto the puck a little too long and sometimes passes up the shot in order to make the pass.
Now this is only from the games I've seen him in the WJC, but he certainly is a very skilled player.
Well, he may remind of you of Hemsky but Granlund's upside is much higher.
Anything lower than NHL top ten would be a dissapointment.
Not you again.
Yes he is better than he has played this tourny but he can't do it all, he has passed to Pulkkinen 5 open nets per game, if he had a real goal scorer beside him he might have something like 15-16 assists.
He should shoot more tho.
Well you are setting yourself up for a massive dissapointment if you expect any player to be a top 10 player in the league before they even make it to the NHL.
If Granlund had as much success at putting up points as Hemsky has in his career I don't see how you could possibly see that as a disappointment. Guys who hover around just under PPG are not all that common in this league. If Granlund can become that it would be a huge success.
I would be disappointed, maybe because i'm very high on him but people have stated that Radulov and Granlund are top 2 players outside of NHL. We have to remind that Granlund is 19 and his game is better against men than Juniors.Granlund has very high upside. time will tell.
What are you all crying about real goalscorers? You mean when he get's to play with Ovie or Stamkos? Yeah not gonna happen. Pulkkinen is as real as it comes.
Granlund hasn't played nowhere near his true ability in this tournament excluding the Slovakia game witch tells alot about the level of this tourney. He looks like he isn't even trying half the time but still leads in scoring. He's just too good to be there.
Granlund actualy played 10minutes on his true level on slovakia game which ended for 4 points.