Dubi Doo
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2008
- 20,635
- 14,778
Well said. Level headed take.Oh, I am not writing off either player as finished products. I am always preaching to give the young players time and curb expectations as they are developing. My issue is strictly with the D makeup not being ideal with both Power and Byram learning how to play D. You can have one guy like that, but having two guys like that means you have a defensive liability on the ice nearly 2/3rds of every game.
I also feel that both players need that second unit PP time to build up confidence and properly develop. Sure, they can go back to a two defeneman PP and have Byram and Dahlin play catch and use their creativity, maybe that works, but that is getting away from utilizing the popular bumper movement which has the best teams really pushing the envelop of hard to defend powerplays.
This team needs players that are best in slot for certain roles more than they need players with the most talent potential. Sometimes, chemistry, fit, and having guys knowing their roles and doing their jobs is more important than having the most talent.
I'm intrigued by Byram the player. Im not confident Adams has a clue how to find players that fill roles that will lead to a contender.
Im intrigued about building around Dahlin, Byram, and Power, but Im not thrilled with having to go through the defensive growing pains of TWO players in our top-4 while we're trying to compete now + another one of our top-4 players is always injured and played far below his ability this season (Sammy).
Give me a stable top-4 guy (Ekholm-lite) to round out the top-4, and put Sammy with Clifton. That top-4 desperately needs a savvy vet who is consistently available to play. But, this comes back to my main point- Adams has shown to be ass at filling needed roles on this roster- so he's probably oblivious to that need.