You guys are wrong. Match penalties are not judgement based. The rule book for the NHL clearly says,( rule 58.4) "A match penalty shall be imposed on a player or goalkeeper who injures an opponent as a result of a butt-end." So if the Refs decided this was a butt-end and the player was injured, they must give this penalty. No judgement here-- it' a rule book penalty!
Kreider
Kreider
If you say his name 3 times, he’ll appear like Beetlejuice, so be careful.
I'm more curious about why it was called a butt end to begin with considering the whole sequence of events. Lemieux certainly wasn't expecting the guy to get tripped into him, he (in my opinion) didn't push out his stick at Roussell's head, he just pulled his arms in to brace for the collision. Seems like the ref say an awkward collision with a players head hitting another players hand area and it resulted in an injury (even though the injury was to his knee) and decided to call it a butt end.
Yeah hit from behindIf we ever do trade Chris--it should be to the Canucks and then maybe Penguin Gudbranson will come along and kill him for the elbow on Pettersson.
It's not the usual for the NHL to apologize for the on ice officials. The apology to the Rangers a week or so ago for Zibanejad was very unusual. This call was if anything even more bizarre. Would the NHL apologize to us again. At a certain point then I would think we would get something from the league if they're going to be apologizing to us all the time.
Why did TSN say Lemieux hit Roussel from behind? Did they even watch the play?
If you say his name 3 times, he’ll appear like Beetlejuice, so be careful.