The potential of the San Jose Sharks

Perfect_Drug

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
16,147
12,921
Montreal
Rebuild looking pretty good so far.


Buffalo should have been good if it wasn't for a complete lack of patience.

Look at what that core could have been:
J.Eichel
S.Reinhart
T.Thompson
R.Dahlin
E.Rodriguez
O.Powers
L.Ullmark
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,320
16,510
1G - Askarov
1C - Celebrini
2C - Smith
1D - Dickinson(?)

They already seem to have most of the difficult pieces to acquire; just need a few more quality defensemen and for their top wing prospects to pan out. Matthew Schaefer would be an ideal get for them at the draft.
Having Dickinson fall all the way into their lap at #11 was always criminal to me.

He was always the best D IMO and should have been drafted in the top 5
 
  • Like
Reactions: 67 others

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
89,884
35,209
Langley, BC
I know nothing about him, but Jake Furlong was on Team USA for the WHJC-U20 last year, so I'm guessing he should be on that list.

But yeah, definately the Sharks have some good building blocks for the future.

This is the most pedantic and pointless contribution that could be made to this thread, but Furlong played for Canada.

He's probably a depth D/bottom pairing guy at best though, so I'm also fine with him not being lumped into the prospect core. Canada always likes to take a few role player types into the WJCs, so it's not an automatic badge of authenticity as a key prospect to be named to a team in a supporting role.
 

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
22,269
10,972
Loaded with young talent at every position. Still a long way to go but they just have an "it" factor that the other rebuilding teams don't. If i had to bet on who the next multi cup winner a la Chicago/Pittsburgh/Tampa would be among the rebuilding teams I'd put my money on them. He took a lot of flack but Grier is doing an excellent job.
 

Crow

Registered User
May 19, 2014
4,640
3,506
I think they are a little bit lacking on D prospects even though I love Dickinson’s game. Schaefer would make me change my mind and they may very well end up with him.
 

67 others

Registered User
Jul 30, 2010
3,028
2,301
Moose country
I think they are a little bit lacking on D prospects even though I love Dickinson’s game. Schaefer would make me change my mind and they may very well end up with him.
No love for Cagnoni, Mukhamadullin or Pohlkamp?

I would love to get Schaefer, but even if we don't, Dickinson is pretty special and we can aim for some solid Defense first guys

I actually wanted the sharks to draft EJ Emery, Ben Danford or Dominic Badinka, but 2 were picked 30 and 31 just before we could grab them and Chernyshov was available and he was projected to go 22-28 and fell to us at 33.

Still would have preferred Badinka with that pick, but Chernyshov was solid value.

At the end of the day, I'm happy with our crop of prospects and graduates like Eklund and Zetterlund.
 

Crow

Registered User
May 19, 2014
4,640
3,506
No love for Cagnoni, Mukhamadullin or Pohlkamp?

I would love to get Schaefer, but even if we don't, Dickinson is pretty special and we can aim for some solid Defense first guys

I actually wanted the sharks to draft EJ Emery, Ben Danford or Dominic Badinka, but 2 were picked 30 and 31 just before we could grab them and Chernyshov was available and he was projected to go 22-28 and fell to us at 33.

Still would have preferred Badinka with that pick, but Chernyshov was solid value.

At the end of the day, I'm happy with our crop of prospects and graduates like Eklund and Zetterlund.
Those guys have potential I just don’t think they are top pairing type guys. It’s pretty rare for a guy Cagnoni’s size to make an impact at the NHL level on defense. He might be that special case but I have doubts. Mukhamadullin has been worth following but I don’t see him as an all situations type of guy. Not that familiar with pohlkamp. I would just be more comfortable with the rebuild with one more blue chip D man with bonafide #1 potential in case Dickinson doesn’t reach his. Maybe Pohlkamp can be that guy.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,628
5,832
Those guys have potential I just don’t think they are top pairing type guys. It’s pretty rare for a guy Cagnoni’s size to make an impact at the NHL level on defense. He might be that special case but I have doubts. Mukhamadullin has been worth following but I don’t see him as an all situations type of guy. Not that familiar with pohlkamp. I would just be more comfortable with the rebuild with one more blue chip D man with bonafide #1 potential in case Dickinson doesn’t reach his. Maybe Pohlkamp can be that guy.
You're right to be skeptical. We went through 10 years with essentially no good prospects or outcomes, so now we have a few and we're excited, but it'll be a very rare and lucky hit if Cagnoni, Mukh, or Pohlkamp make it as an actual impact player (and not just replacement level). We really could use another impact D, but we also are probably short another, bigger, scoring winger. That may happen through FA or trade in the distant future. It's going to be a long journey.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad