- Feb 12, 2008
- 19,347
- 8,963
The Blues didn’t play their best hockey these past 2 games but came away with 4 points. They did what they needed to
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerCurrent Points | Games Remaining | Possible Points | RW | ROW | Common Games | |
Wild | 85 | 12 | 109 | 32 | 37 | vs C, vs V |
Flames | 77 | 13 | 103 | 26 | 30 | vs U, vs W |
Blues | 81 | 10 | 101 | 27 | 33 | vs U |
Canucks | 76 | 12 | 100 | 25 | 30 | vs W |
Utah | 75 | 12 | 99 | 24 | 31 | vs C, vs B |
I don't think strength of schedule is the only thing that matters when looking at remaining schedules.A lot has been said about how easy our schedule is compared to the other wild card teams, but that was heavily weighted by this prior week. That was really the only week where there is a big disparity in opponents faced. The Blues no longer have the easiest schedule remaining. We have the 18th hardest now. Calgary and Utah have the 16th and 17th hardest. Our strength of schedule is no longer a meaningful aspect of this playoff race. Calgary, and to a lesser extent Vancouver and Utah, did exactly what they needed to do and weathered the storm of hard opponents.
I think you hit the nail on the head at the end of your comment. These next four, both us and Calgary may well decide this race. While EDM may be without McDavid/Drai, that is a tough 3 game stretch for them after Seattle. We also have 3 tough games this week, as even though we've handled NSH, they aren't going to be easy to beat a 3rd time in a week, and MTL is playing some damn good hockey.It's the next 4 games where they have to weather the storm. They have an easy matchup against the Kraken, but then they play three top 10 teams (3rd place Dallas, 10th place Edmonton, and 8th place Colorado). While we don't have another easy week, Montreal, Nashville, and Colorado isn't bad. This week is one of their games in hand, so they need to earn 2 more points than us to 'weather the storm.'
I agree with this. Calgary has to make up three games in the next four weeks compared to us. Travel and rest are huge at this point of the year, with everyone ramping up the intensity as the playoffs are around the corner. This week will tell us a lot about where we stand. They have a murder's row of Dallas/Edmonton/Colorado, whereas we play Montreal/Nashville/Colorado. They also have to squeeze in a game against Seattle, who are currently playing fairly well.I don't think strength of schedule is the only thing that matters when looking at remaining schedules.
I'd take the spacing of our schedule over Calgary's. We're done with back to backs and we are also done with those stretches where you have 3+ days off and can build some rust. From here on out, we play every other night, with the exception of 3 instances where we have 2 days off. To compare, the Flames are currently in their last 2 day break. Starting tomorrow, they play every other night until the last day of the season, with the only exception being a road back-to-back. Utah has two more stretches of 2 days off, but they also have 2 more sets of road back-to-backs. Vancouver has two more 2 day breaks, but they also have a back-to-back in there (along with a harder strength of schedule).
One benefit to those teams having games in hand is that they have already burned through some 'extra' days off and are going to have less recovery time between games. And Calgary still has to actually win those games in hand for them to be beneficial. They need to either go 2-1 (both regulation wins) or 2-0-1 over those 3 games in hand to still control their own destiny. An OT win, a regulation win, and a regulation loss would leave them tied with us in points and regulation wins, but then we would still control the ROW tiebreaker. Games in hand are nice, but they are far from a lock to make up the needed ground in those games in hand.
FWIW, I wouldn't say that Calgary weathered the storm of hard opponents. They snagged 6 of 8 possible points this week, losing in regulation to the Leafs (9th in the NHL) and then beating the mediocre NYC trio (14th, 20th, and 21st in the NHL). It was a pretty middling strength of schedule and over the same week we went 4-0, so we gained 2 points worth of ground on them. Our remaining strength of schedule got harder, but I don't think theirs got easier. It's the next 4 games where they have to weather the storm. They have an easy matchup against the Kraken, but then they play three top 10 teams (3rd place Dallas, 10th place Edmonton, and 8th place Colorado). While we don't have another easy week, Montreal, Nashville, and Colorado isn't bad. This week is one of their games in hand, so they need to earn 2 more points than us to 'weather the storm.'
Obviously it was big for Calgary to win 3 in a row, but they went 0-2-1 right before then and lost ground to us again last week.
I don't think strength of schedule is the only thing that matters when looking at remaining schedules.
I'd take the spacing of our schedule over Calgary's. We're done with back to backs and we are also done with those stretches where you have 3+ days off and can build some rust. From here on out, we play every other night, with the exception of 3 instances where we have 2 days off. To compare, the Flames are currently in their last 2 day break. Starting tomorrow, they play every other night until the last day of the season, with the only exception being a road back-to-back. Utah has two more stretches of 2 days off, but they also have 2 more sets of road back-to-backs. Vancouver has two more 2 day breaks, but they also have a back-to-back in there (along with a harder strength of schedule).
One benefit to those teams having games in hand is that they have already burned through some 'extra' days off and are going to have less recovery time between games. And Calgary still has to actually win those games in hand for them to be beneficial. They need to either go 2-1 (both regulation wins) or 2-0-1 over those 3 games in hand to still control their own destiny. An OT win, a regulation win, and a regulation loss would leave them tied with us in points and regulation wins, but then we would still control the ROW tiebreaker. Games in hand are nice, but they are far from a lock to make up the needed ground in those games in hand.
FWIW, I wouldn't say that Calgary weathered the storm of hard opponents. They snagged 6 of 8 possible points this week, losing in regulation to the Leafs (9th in the NHL) and then beating the mediocre NYC trio (14th, 20th, and 21st in the NHL). It was a pretty middling strength of schedule and over the same week we went 4-0, so we gained 2 points worth of ground on them. Our remaining strength of schedule got harder, but I don't think theirs got easier. It's the next 4 games where they have to weather the storm. They have an easy matchup against the Kraken, but then they play three top 10 teams (3rd place Dallas, 10th place Edmonton, and 8th place Colorado). While we don't have another easy week, Montreal, Nashville, and Colorado isn't bad. This week is one of their games in hand, so they need to earn 2 more points than us to 'weather the storm.'
Obviously it was big for Calgary to win 3 in a row, but they went 0-2-1 right before then and lost ground to us again last week.
I think there is a decent chance that those games won't be meaningless for those teams.The only thing I really see concerning with Calgary’s schedule is the last two games. There’s a big chance LA and Vegas are resting guys for the playoffs for those games. The game has to be played so can’t count as a win for the Flames but if I was a betting man in Vegas I would be betting on Calgary. Especially if us and Calgary are still close at that point.
Hopefully the Blues are far enough ahead at that point that it won’t matter but if it comes down to that last week it will be pins and needles around here.
They will have their backs against the wall, so I expect them to fight hard. They have two games in hand as well. I think the Wild will hold onto the WC1.It’s time to add Minnesota to our watchlist. They play Dallas, Vegas (b2b) and then Washington this week.
I'm not really adding them to our watchlist unless/until they actually falter. They can go 1-3-1 to close out March and would still be a point ahead of us in the standings and control tiebreaker even if we went 3-0 to close out the month. That would erase their 'games in hand' advantage and would get me ready to really start watching them. They can go 2-3-0 to close out March and still be 4 points ahead of us if we "only" go 2-1 and then their April schedule is manageable. They beat the Kings last week and the Avs a couple weeks ago. They are running on fumes, but they are still playing well enough that they are a foregone conclusion to go below .500 in these next 5 games.It’s time to add Minnesota to our watchlist. They play Dallas, Vegas (b2b) and then Washington this week.
That's the next 4 games without Petey and Hoglander. Their lineup looks brutal when you remove the two of them. Hopefully that is the final nail and we can stop worrying about them.
Devils now up 3-2 on the Canucks with under 5:00 left. Dallas up 2-0 on Wild after 2.
They are missing Jack and Dougie so they are missing two extremely important pieces of their coreDevils blow a 3 goal lead to Calgary and then lose to the Canucks. Whet did we ever do to them?
Signed Shanahan, tampered with Stevens, and then signed Brodeur. or was that a rhetorical question?Devils blow a 3 goal lead to Calgary and then lose to the Canucks. Whet did we ever do to them?