OT: The Pittsburgher Thread: 5 and 2 Justin who? Hand the Fields to Wilson

FlightlessBird

Registered User
Nov 5, 2005
3,904
1,355
Pittsburgh
Over the last 3 games, outscored 90-40 and out gained 1,024yds - 840yds lmfao
Related to that…

Postgame Q: “You said a few weeks ago the next 3 games would tell you a lot about who you are as a team. What did you find out?”

Tomlin: “I don’t remember saying that…”

I’m not going back to look, but I could guarantee he said it. That 100% sounds like something he would say. But he needs to look at those stats above and f***ing fix it.
 

Ryder71

Registered User
Nov 24, 2017
24,898
11,875
Related to that…

Postgame Q: “You said a few weeks ago the next 3 games would tell you a lot about who you are as a team. What did you find out?”

Tomlin: “I don’t remember saying that…”

I’m not going back to look, but I could guarantee he said it. That 100% sounds like something he would say. But he needs to look at those stats above and f***ing fix it.
Sometimes the opposition is just better. You can change certain schemes and be more opportunistic. But the disparity in talent is sometimes just too much to overcome. And I'm talking about both the players and the coaching staffs.
 

FlightlessBird

Registered User
Nov 5, 2005
3,904
1,355
Pittsburgh
Sometimes the opposition is just better. You can change certain schemes and be more opportunistic. But the disparity in talent is sometimes just too much to overcome. And I'm talking about both the players and the coaching staffs.
I get it, but we saw the same problems every game. And being unprepared is something he can fix.
 

ChaosAgent

Registered User
May 8, 2018
18,642
12,677
It's good to remember that Tomlin needs to be sent away. At times I forget and get caught up in the week-to-week excitement of the season, but the big picture takeaway is that he and his 2nd rate flunky staff get dominated against elite teams & staffs every single year. Dude is a human dead end. NHALS can GFY.
 

Ryder71

Registered User
Nov 24, 2017
24,898
11,875
I get it, but we saw the same problems every game. And being unprepared is something he can fix.
I don't think that changes the outcome. The score possibly but not the outcome.

Also, being unprepared under this coach isn't likely to all of a sudden change. He is who he is.

#MR.Knowitall
 

bigdaddyk88

Registered User
Apr 21, 2019
4,702
937
Related to that…

Postgame Q: “You said a few weeks ago the next 3 games would tell you a lot about who you are as a team. What did you find out?”

Tomlin: “I don’t remember saying that…”

I’m not going back to look, but I could guarantee he said it. That 100% sounds like something he would say. But he needs to look at those stats above and f***ing fix it.
Smith definitely said something similar
 

End of Line

Sic Semper Tyrannis
Mar 20, 2009
28,637
6,284
Related to that…

Postgame Q: “You said a few weeks ago the next 3 games would tell you a lot about who you are as a team. What did you find out?”

Tomlin: “I don’t remember saying that…”

I’m not going back to look, but I could guarantee he said it. That 100% sounds like something he would say. But he needs to look at those stats above and f***ing fix it.

He doesn’t hold anyone accountable let alone himself lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlightlessBird

ImporterExporter

"You're a boring old man"
Jun 18, 2013
19,318
8,321
Oblivion Express
1735165390360.png
 

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
53,438
35,131
From Starkey in the Post Gazette…pretty accurate…

“In eight games against teams currently in playoff position, the Steelers are averaging just 17.1 points per game. That kind of number got Matt Canada fired.”

“Can we say it’s officially a collapse?

The Steelers — relatively healthy compared to last week’s blowout loss in Baltimore — were badly overmatched in the two most important areas in the sport: quarterbacking and coaching. Their defense is sadly overrated. Their offensive tackles are junior varsity. Their play-calling is predictable. Their back end in coverage is constantly disorganized.”

 

xlm34

Registered User
Dec 1, 2008
3,375
3,453
From Starkey in the Post Gazette…pretty accurate…

“In eight games against teams currently in playoff position, the Steelers are averaging just 17.1 points per game. That kind of number got Matt Canada fired.”

“Can we say it’s officially a collapse?

The Steelers — relatively healthy compared to last week’s blowout loss in Baltimore — were badly overmatched in the two most important areas in the sport: quarterbacking and coaching. Their defense is sadly overrated. Their offensive tackles are junior varsity. Their play-calling is predictable. Their back end in coverage is constantly disorganized.”


I wouldn’t even say this is a collapse. It’s just what they’ve been the whole season, only now they’re playing teams that are actually Super Bowl contenders instead of playing the Jets and Giants.

Like I’d still feel decent about this teams chances in the playoffs against Houston but beyond that they’re going nowhere. And until the actually take their offense seriously I don’t think they ever will.
 

The Old Master

come and take it.
Sep 27, 2004
18,298
5,271
burgh
I wouldn’t even say this is a collapse. It’s just what they’ve been the whole season, only now they’re playing teams that are actually Super Bowl contenders instead of playing the Jets and Giants.

Like I’d still feel decent about this teams chances in the playoffs against Houston but beyond that they’re going nowhere. And until the actually take their offense seriously I don’t think they ever will.
they are a team that needs everyone healthy and a little good luck to be successful. it's no surprise that they are struggling
 

JTG

Registered User
Sep 30, 2007
50,966
6,060
The last 2 games the difference really has been horrible turnovers. Win that battle...probably win these last 2 games. They happened at back breaking times and positions on the field. Whatever...we knew that when they got to 9 games it was very possible they lost every one that point out. Non-losing. Non-winning. Doesn't matter.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
86,421
87,369
Redmond, WA
In a perfect world, I think you re-sign Wilson but draft a QB in round 1 to sit behind him for a year or 2. The mock draft website I use (Walter Football) has the Steelers taking Milroe at 25, I think drafting Milroe and sitting him behind Wilson for 2 years is an excellent option. The thing that concerns me though is that I think Milroe at 25 is a bit of a reach, but I don't think he'd be lasting until their 2nd rounder.

If they could do it, I'd probably trade down with their 1st for an early 2nd and another pick to draft Milroe with that early 2nd. Have Milroe learn from Wilson for like 2 years and then hand the starting QB role over to him.
 

Snooki Stackhouse

Registered User
Dec 6, 2007
6,440
694
Pittsburgh
In a perfect world, I think you re-sign Wilson but draft a QB in round 1 to sit behind him for a year or 2. The mock draft website I use (Walter Football) has the Steelers taking Milroe at 25, I think drafting Milroe and sitting him behind Wilson for 2 years is an excellent option. The thing that concerns me though is that I think Milroe at 25 is a bit of a reach, but I don't think he'd be lasting until their 2nd rounder.

If they could do it, I'd probably trade down with their 1st for an early 2nd and another pick to draft Milroe with that early 2nd. Have Milroe learn from Wilson for like 2 years and then hand the starting QB role over to him.
Milroe would be a nice option to sit for a couple years behind Wilson. Or Fields, since I'm not sure Russ is the best option for $40mm contract. For Milroe, 2nd is better, but I think so many teams are QB needy that some reach a bit and you're going to have to spend a 1st. His combine is going to be ridiculous and I feel like he's a late first guy. Steelers have a lot of needs but they need a long term vision at the QB position and they have to keep trying to find the guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Empoleon8771

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad