The only roster players we'd actually trade

Who could be included in a trade to become cap compliant, without upsetting team chemistry?

  • Gryz

    Votes: 91 85.0%
  • Forbort

    Votes: 38 35.5%
  • Shatty

    Votes: 23 21.5%
  • Poitras

    Votes: 15 14.0%
  • Beecher

    Votes: 26 24.3%
  • Steen

    Votes: 71 66.4%
  • Boqvist

    Votes: 58 54.2%
  • Lauko

    Votes: 26 24.3%
  • Debrusk!

    Votes: 29 27.1%
  • Linus!

    Votes: 22 20.6%

  • Total voters
    107

goldnblack

Registered User
Jun 24, 2020
3,395
6,437
Swayman looked really good during the Linus injury and said he wants to start as many games as he can. That day is coming soon. Probably at the draft.

I don't see the point of half of the players on this poll when it comes to cap compliancy. They don't make enough money to matter. Their roster spot would still have to be filled by someone. There is no savings there. Several of them have next to no trade value.

That exact point was made in the OP
 

22Brad Park

Registered User
Nov 23, 2008
47,830
27,103
Calgary AB
Any UFA like Debrusk not signed have to go.Bruins cannot afford to let players walk for nothing with no seat basically at draft table till 2025.

Swayman looked really good during the Linus injury and said he wants to start as many games as he can. That day is coming soon. Probably at the draft.



That exact point was made in the OP
Linus has 16 team NTC this season 15 next so would not bet on them trading him
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBruins and Gordoff

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,319
24,244
Swayman looked really good during the Linus injury and said he wants to start as many games as he can. That day is coming soon. Probably at the draft.



That exact point was made in the OP

Then why put them in there and gum up the results of the poll?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

jgatie

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 22, 2011
11,815
12,954
Reading some takes in here on Ullmark, and remembering the same crap being said about Tuukka reminds me that the old anti-Euro bullshit of the past is alive and well in some corners of the hockey world. Be better B's fans. Be better.
 

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
9,186
10,731
- I have guys I would trade that I guess you can call redundant and could recoup assets/ probably dont have a future with this team (Gryz/Forbort)

-I still dont trade Ullmark. I will die on that hill.

-And I honestly think, for what JDB brings you, you arent getting any better on the open market at what hes probably going to get.

- I have (young) guys I would trade if it meant upgrading the NHL roster now (Poitras/Beecher/Lauko, etc). Probably not a favorable take- and putting it out there Im not trading them for the sake of trading them- but I would entertain the idea if it meant getting a proven NHL player to play in this top 6.

I want to see more of our quarters traded for the dollar ala Hampus/Taylor Hall and what it took to bring them in. This team is still very much in their window with the new core. The move from Bergy/Krejci has not been as damaging as was expected by many of us. And its only going to help that they have more cap relief coming this offseason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

UncleRico

Registered User
May 8, 2017
9,327
12,150
Reading some takes in here on Ullmark, and remembering the same crap being said about Tuukka reminds me that the old anti-Euro bullshit of the past is alive and well in some corners of the hockey world. Be better B's fans. Be better.

Tuukka Rask had a .925 sv percentage and 2.22 GAA playoffs

Ullmark has a .888 sv percentage and 3.54 GAA in the playoffs

There is a legitimate reason to want to move on from Ullmark. Sure people will say small sample size for Ullmark, but Ullmark very poor playoff performance is the the reason his sample size is small.

Any UFA like Debrusk not signed have to go.Bruins cannot afford to let players walk for nothing with no seat basically at draft table till 2025.


Linus has 16 team NTC this season 15 next so would not bet on them trading him

No one that has a legit role on the team will be moved. Who was the last top 9 or bottom 4 roster player moved out by Sweeney?

Not sure if it’s ever happened during his tenure. Doubt it will this year.
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,474
4,848
I don't see why any of the three should be traded before the TDL. Grizz hasn't been great this year, but he is still a versatile and reasonably effective D (and wouldn't bring much back in a trade anyway). JVR is the kind of veteran player the B's normally try to add at TDLs, and Steen would at least be a serviceable member of the Black Aces. I hope the B's can extend Debrusk, who has reached a new level this season.
Gryz should be moved for cap reasons alone, not worth his salary take that cap space and apply it to other needs. JVR and Steen you someone will give you something take it, both are irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
31,371
20,878
Connecticut
Tuukka Rask had a .925 sv percentage and 2.22 GAA playoffs

Ullmark has a .888 sv percentage and 3.54 GAA in the playoffs

There is a legitimate reason to want to move on from Ullmark. Sure people will say small sample size for Ullmark, but Ullmark very poor playoff performance is the the reason his sample size is small.



No one that has a legit role on the team will be moved. Who was the last top 9 or bottom 4 roster player moved out by Sweeney?

Not sure if it’s ever happened during his tenure. Doubt it will this year.

 

UConn126

Bass Player.
Sponsor
Jun 12, 2010
8,842
7,786
Somerville, MA
Gryz should be actively shopped for a pick. He's been good for us, but time to move on. His replacement is already clear in Lorhei.

Ullmark I don't actively try to move, but I listen to offers. Depending on what DeBrusk wants in an extension, I do the same with him.

Other than that I don't touch this roster very much. Maybe add a cheap depth piece of two, ideally with some size, but don't break the bank. I don't find Lindholm appealing at all like many here do. I think we can afford to take it slow in the search for a center.

Horrible take
I don't think it's that horrible. Swayman is 100% the better option in the playoffs. I'd rather have Ullmark on the bench than Bussi, but I agree with that poster that I feel way more confident with Sway in net. Ullmark has done nothing in the playoffs to instill confidence.
 

SwayHeyKid

Registered User
Mar 14, 2022
1,976
2,257
Reading some takes in here on Ullmark, and remembering the same crap being said about Tuukka reminds me that the old anti-Euro bullshit of the past is alive and well in some corners of the hockey world. Be better B's fans. Be better.
He's stunk his first two play-off seasons as a Bruin. Rask was good his first play-off and elite the second go round.

The only similarity between the two play-offs wise two years in is they are both from Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBruins and Gordoff

jgatie

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 22, 2011
11,815
12,954
He's stunk his first two play-off seasons as a Bruin. Rask was good his first play-off and elite the second go round.

The only similarity between the two play-offs wise two years in is they are both from Europe.

I wasn't talking about any similarities in their performance. I was talking about how some posters speak about them, and for some of those, there are a great many similarites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SwayHeyKid

Ozzy Osbourne

Registered User
Nov 14, 2023
1,607
1,843
Gryz is simply awful. I can’t imagine there’s much of a market for a defenseman who gives up the puck over taking any contact. Sweeney will probably extend him before the deadline anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBruins and Gordoff

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,315
18,819
Newton, MA.
Thinking Ahead to a small trade, up to an Elias Lindholm sized trade, there's a (very good) chance that we have to shed a roster player or two to be cap compliant. Not an easy thing to do when a team has such good chemistry.

Last year Reilly (sent down), Craig Smith and Stud were the guys. Obvious non-core underperformers. Haula before that was a true hockey trade.

So this year who are the only remotely plausible names we could trade to get cap compliant without upsetting the team chemistry or depth? I'll list some uncontroversial names and maybe some more controversial ones. I didn't put Lohrei because I guess he's not counting against the cap presently. I also recognize that the guys listed on nearly league minimum certainly don't make much sense, nor would they offer much relief. Hence the bind...
 

neelynugs

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
35,636
10,620
Tuukka Rask had a .925 sv percentage and 2.22 GAA playoffs

Ullmark has a .888 sv percentage and 3.54 GAA in the playoffs

There is a legitimate reason to want to move on from Ullmark. Sure people will say small sample size for Ullmark, but Ullmark very poor playoff performance is the the reason his sample size is small.

i'm still conflicted about last spring. ullmark had a .926 SV% in the first 4 games. looked close to his regular season performance, but we started to see some signs of either fatigue or injury. he claims that he wasn't hurt, although the eye test says otherwise in games 5 and 6 (where he gave up 10 goals and should've been pulled numerous times in game 6, but monty saw the eye of the tiger or whatever he said and kept him in).

so is the playoff choker overblown a bit? we don't know that yet. but to me he looked like 2 different goalies in that series.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad