Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
Meh, worth the risk to roll Swayman/Bussi instead of giving Ullmark the chance to 3-peat crapping his pants in the playoffs
Which has nothing to do team chemistry.
Meh, worth the risk to roll Swayman/Bussi instead of giving Ullmark the chance to 3-peat crapping his pants in the playoffs
Do you still think that way if Sway gets hurt and were rolling Bussi/Dipietro?Meh, worth the risk to roll Swayman/Bussi instead of giving Ullmark the chance to 3-peat crapping his pants in the playoffs
I don't see the point of half of the players on this poll when it comes to cap compliancy. They don't make enough money to matter. Their roster spot would still have to be filled by someone. There is no savings there. Several of them have next to no trade value.
Linus has 16 team NTC this season 15 next so would not bet on them trading himSwayman looked really good during the Linus injury and said he wants to start as many games as he can. That day is coming soon. Probably at the draft.
That exact point was made in the OP
Swayman looked really good during the Linus injury and said he wants to start as many games as he can. That day is coming soon. Probably at the draft.
That exact point was made in the OP
Then why put them in there and gum up the results of the poll?
Because the second I don't, people ask where they are, lol. I know you know this.
poll so far says: adios Gryz
Reading some takes in here on Ullmark, and remembering the same crap being said about Tuukka reminds me that the old anti-Euro bullshit of the past is alive and well in some corners of the hockey world. Be better B's fans. Be better.
Any UFA like Debrusk not signed have to go.Bruins cannot afford to let players walk for nothing with no seat basically at draft table till 2025.
Linus has 16 team NTC this season 15 next so would not bet on them trading him
Gryz should be moved for cap reasons alone, not worth his salary take that cap space and apply it to other needs. JVR and Steen you someone will give you something take it, both are irrelevant.I don't see why any of the three should be traded before the TDL. Grizz hasn't been great this year, but he is still a versatile and reasonably effective D (and wouldn't bring much back in a trade anyway). JVR is the kind of veteran player the B's normally try to add at TDLs, and Steen would at least be a serviceable member of the Black Aces. I hope the B's can extend Debrusk, who has reached a new level this season.
Gryz should be moved for cap reasons alone, not worth his salary take that cap space and apply it to other needs. JVR and Steen you someone will give you something take it, both are irrelevant.
It’s wild to me that there are some who are still advocating for trading Ullmark.
Tuukka Rask had a .925 sv percentage and 2.22 GAA playoffs
Ullmark has a .888 sv percentage and 3.54 GAA in the playoffs
There is a legitimate reason to want to move on from Ullmark. Sure people will say small sample size for Ullmark, but Ullmark very poor playoff performance is the the reason his sample size is small.
No one that has a legit role on the team will be moved. Who was the last top 9 or bottom 4 roster player moved out by Sweeney?
Not sure if it’s ever happened during his tenure. Doubt it will this year.
I don't think it's that horrible. Swayman is 100% the better option in the playoffs. I'd rather have Ullmark on the bench than Bussi, but I agree with that poster that I feel way more confident with Sway in net. Ullmark has done nothing in the playoffs to instill confidence.Horrible take
He's stunk his first two play-off seasons as a Bruin. Rask was good his first play-off and elite the second go round.Reading some takes in here on Ullmark, and remembering the same crap being said about Tuukka reminds me that the old anti-Euro bullshit of the past is alive and well in some corners of the hockey world. Be better B's fans. Be better.
He's stunk his first two play-off seasons as a Bruin. Rask was good his first play-off and elite the second go round.
The only similarity between the two play-offs wise two years in is they are both from Europe.
Thinking Ahead to a small trade, up to an Elias Lindholm sized trade, there's a (very good) chance that we have to shed a roster player or two to be cap compliant. Not an easy thing to do when a team has such good chemistry.
Last year Reilly (sent down), Craig Smith and Stud were the guys. Obvious non-core underperformers. Haula before that was a true hockey trade.
So this year who are the only remotely plausible names we could trade to get cap compliant without upsetting the team chemistry or depth? I'll list some uncontroversial names and maybe some more controversial ones. I didn't put Lohrei because I guess he's not counting against the cap presently. I also recognize that the guys listed on nearly league minimum certainly don't make much sense, nor would they offer much relief. Hence the bind...
Tuukka Rask had a .925 sv percentage and 2.22 GAA playoffs
Ullmark has a .888 sv percentage and 3.54 GAA in the playoffs
There is a legitimate reason to want to move on from Ullmark. Sure people will say small sample size for Ullmark, but Ullmark very poor playoff performance is the the reason his sample size is small.
Do you still think that way if Sway gets hurt and were rolling Bussi/Dipietro?