Sorinth
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2013
- 11,598
- 6,240
The becoming healthy part of my post was about vets like Markov finally being healthyWhat about Markov being healthier and the division being weak?
The becoming healthy part of my post was about vets like Markov finally being healthyWhat about Markov being healthier and the division being weak?
Guhle’s potential is enormous.If the Bruins have two great goalies, the Habs have 3. Dont mistake team defensive stats for greatness.
They have two superstars that are better than our two star forwards but the Habs have way more depth. Dach is better than their third best forward.
On defense, I think Guhle is criminally underrated because hes young. He had nothing to envy to any of the Ds on the Bruins squad when he was at his top last year.
You're right !The becoming healthy part of my post was about vets like Markov finally being healthy
Can't see us being bottom 5 unless we hit the injury train again. One of these years the bad luck has to run outNot many teams going to be worse than us in the east barring extreme injuries. Lottery for sure. Even a Top 5 pick would guarantee one of Celebrini, Catton, Demidov, Eiserman or Dickinson. Catton and Dickinson impressed me at Hlinka.
Anaheim, Columbus, Chicago, San Jose all finished below us last season and will probably do so again. Philly is likely dropping a lot, and we could quite easily beat Arizona and although hard to predict which team exactly there's usually at least one that has an unexpectedly bad year which would put us 8th from the bottom. And if some of our guys stay healthy and/or take the next step in their development we could quite easily be sitting outside the top-10.Not many teams going to be worse than us in the east barring extreme injuries. Lottery for sure. Even a Top 5 pick would guarantee one of Celebrini, Catton, Demidov, Eiserman or Dickinson. Catton and Dickinson impressed me at Hlinka.
Perhaps the biggest addition they made this summer was the training staff.Can't see us being bottom 5 unless we hit the injury train again. One of these years the bad luck has to run out
With Petry, the Habs were a middle of the pack bubble team. Now, they will likely finish in the bottom 10.Not many teams going to be worse than us in the east barring extreme injuries. Lottery for sure. Even a Top 5 pick would guarantee one of Celebrini, Catton, Demidov, Eiserman or Dickinson. Catton and Dickinson impressed me at Hlinka.
Gally likely is going to call it quits soon. LTIR is getting crowded again. There is no future with Armia on this team, HuGo must be desperately trying to get rid of him. He will be placed on waivers and Laval bound along with Wideman. After, the mess is pretty much cleared up baring the Price contract.Losing Tank Commanders Hoffman and Drouin will be a big blow, will need someone to step up and continue the slack. D is too deep to get Wideman into many games to help us lose, might fall to Armia and Gally and whichever backup cracks the line up
Anaheim, Columbus, Chicago, San Jose all finished below us last season and will probably do so again. Philly is likely dropping a lot, and we could quite easily beat Arizona and although hard to predict which team exactly there's usually at least one that has an unexpectedly bad year which would put us 8th from the bottom. And if some of our guys stay healthy and/or take the next step in their development we could quite easily be sitting outside the top-10.
I think we can expect Caufield, Dach, and Guhle to improve their PPG. We can expect Suzuki to improve his PPG but it seems to me it'll be a function of playing with better/healthier linemates. So those are the four players I've the biggest hopes.The Habs were 5th last last year. If they gain 12 points they will be 9th last, and if they gain 17 points they will be 11th last.
That is a steep climb.
But, their best players are young, they led the league in injuries, and they replaced Drouin, Hoffman, and Dadonov with Newhook, Harvey Pinard, and Ylonen.
I suspect at the completion of 2025/ 2026 we will have a much better idea if the young cohort ( Hutson, Mailloux, Reinbacher, Newhook, Slafkovsky, Beck, etc.) we are all breathlessly awaiting to support our return to competitiveness is a reality or constitutes mere hype. I remain optimistic in this regard.Toe Blake once said...................predictions are for gypsies.
Don't care where we finish this year, they will be more fun to watch with a couple of more kids coming into the lineup with more TOI and some rinse and repeat deadwood long gone.
Patience guys....the real fun starts 2024-25
Petry? Seriously..................you saw the way he played going out the door? The Pens fans were not happy with him last year, and as he hits 36 you think he made us better?With Petry, the Habs were a middle of the pack bubble team. Now, they will likely finish in the bottom 10.
Not a chance. They may have been disappointed on the O side but C'mon defensively, durability and age wise they aren't even in the same Galaxy.I think Drouin for Newhook is a wash for now -- many Avs fans have the exact same criticisms of Newhook as we have for Drouin -- but Newhook does have upside for more.
The only reason you will be not happy with Petry is if he gets forced to be your #1 D. It's the Brisebois situation, he is a good #3/4 but the moment you make him top pairing it's asking for trouble.Petry? Seriously..................you saw the way he played going out the door? The Pens fans were not happy with him last year, and as he hits 36 you think he made us better?
He is in decline............
Give me the 24 yr old and a pick any day and move on....
IMO the fun starts if/when Slafkovsky starts producing.Toe Blake once said...................predictions are for gypsies.
Don't care where we finish this year, they will be more fun to watch with a couple of more kids coming into the lineup with more TOI and some rinse and repeat deadwood long gone.
Patience guys....the real fun starts 2024-25
In all I think it's another losing season but like @Estimated_Prophet says, we want to see marked improvements among the core players because it would be a much better indicator of future success and the viability of this core than sinking like a stone and hoping for a top pick.
Don't believe Lindström will be your saviour. The D is too deep. You will see him playing in Laval.Petry? Seriously..................you saw the way he played going out the door? The Pens fans were not happy with him last year, and as he hits 36 you think he made us better?
He is in decline............
Give me the 24 yr old and a pick any day and move on....
In reference to just one season's worth of performance I think they're comparable.Not a chance. They may have been disappointed on the O side but C'mon defensively, durability and age wise they aren't even in the same Galaxy.
In reference to just one season's worth of performance I think they're comparable.
Drouin had 29 in 58, exactly 0.5ppg, while Newhook (on a better team) got 0.36ppg. PPG isn't the be all end all but I don't think they're galaxies apart even if you do take into account durability and defensive performance. Newhook is statistically much much better defensively from what I just saw on NHL stats so that's encouraging though, looking forward to an upgrade there, but Avs fans don't have good things to say about his physical or defensive play either. He might be thrown to the wolves here with our much worse team and more leaky defense.
Absolutely not. I don't have spare time as it is and NHL games are hardly exciting, and the Habs have next to no exciting talents to follow outside of sniper Caufield.Will you be buying an AHL viewing package this year?
Age and Price are irrelevant when discussing the prognosis of a single season but sure, I can buy accept that Newhook's 30pts but superior upside is a clear and definitive upgrade on Drouin for the coming season. Drouin was soft and generally terrible.Newhook has a higher goals to assists ratio and probably had less sweet ice time.
And he's younger and cheaper than Drouin was.