Ozmodiar
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 6,539
- 7,977
And how good the goaltending was.Just hi-lights how weak we have been.
1 trip to Finals
2 trips to conf finals
One 1st place in conf
Twice 2nd place in conf
And how good the goaltending was.Just hi-lights how weak we have been.
It really is...I don't know what PK did to this organization behind closed doors, but they're clearly still cheesed lolWeber over Subban is insane.
Subban had 55 playoff games with the Habs and picked up 38pts. I think he led the Habs in playoff points every season too. He was a huge contributor and for a longer time and hit higher highs personally.
Pacioretty should be on the first team over Plekanec, you're right.
Souray hit higher highs than Petry so I get that one.
Basically Price's Canadiens, and the trip to the finals doesn't impress me at all. Penguins handed us the first round, they just wanted to go home. It was an epic lining up of the stars, if we had been in our own division we would not have even made the playoffs.And how good the goaltending was.
1 trip to Finals
2 trips to conf finals
One 1st place in conf
Twice 2nd place in conf
And I would'Ve put Petry over both. Petry played significantly more games here than both.as a roman hamrlik defender i woulda put him over souray
It's still probably more Danault if you don't restrict it to wingers. But of course Caufield is well ahead of Cammalleri. I'm not even sure Cammalleri deserves to be ahead of Gionta to be honest.Neither should Cammaleri.
Caufield has exceeded anything MC did with the Habs.
- total points and goals
- point and goal season high
- went farther in playoffs
If Gallagher had a challenger, it’s him.
I think old geezers like me will agree; these 2 all star teams are just plain said.
Of all the guys there, probably only Price cracks the 2nd team of the previous 25 years.
It's still probably more Danault if you don't restrict it to wingers. But of course Caufield is well ahead of Cammalleri. I'm not even sure Cammalleri deserves to be ahead of Gionta to be honest.
Cammalleri gets bonus points for his playoffs.
What often gets lost in halak's heroics in 2010 is that cammalleri led the league for playoff goals that year too.
Then he scored another 10 points in 7 playoff games the following year.
29 points in 26 career playoff games with the Habs in total.
I love the guys who find another gear in the post season.
Yeah, things lined up nicely in ‘86 and ‘93 as well.Basically Price's Canadiens, and the trip to the finals doesn't impress me at all. Penguins handed us the first round, they just wanted to go home. It was an epic lining up of the stars, if we had been in our own division we would not have even made the playoffs.
That's not enough games played anyhow as far as I'm concerned.
I'll take a stab at it
Lafleur - Carbonneau - Shutt - Robinson - Chelios - Roy
Damphousse - Smith - Gainey - Lapointe - Savard - Dryden
I tried to have a center on every team. If I don't have that requirement, switch Smith with Naslund. Carbo is also probably on the second team, with ... I guess Gainey going to the first?
75 is a super tough cut off, because it cuts right in the middle of a significant part of the late 70ies dynasty. Can't have Cournoyer on the basis of his last 4 seasons only. Can't realy have Jacques Lemaire since he only played around 250 games, compared to more than 600 for everyone else on that team. Eric Desjardins really should have been on that team over one of Lapointe or Savard but was traded for f***ing Doctor Recchi.
Carey Price probably has a claim over Dryden.
The problem with this is, I'm pretty sure Naslund's best individual season is also better than Lemaire's best individual season (during that 4 season timespan for Lemaire anyways). Smith... it's arguable. And Lemaire is absolutely not beating Damphousse to a spot on that team.If souray can get on the board for his 26 goal season, I have no problem with considering lemaire even if he only qualifies for about 5 years of that 25 year window.
You don’t think Suzuki learned anything from having Weber there?Yeah the Habs had a lot of success since he’s retired eh?
That’s not what you said though. I saw a team with a bunch of losers like Hoffman and Drouin not give a damn as we sank to the worst season in Habs history. There was zero lasting effect of Weber’s magical leadership. It left the moment he did. He didn’t affect any change onto the club.You don’t think Suzuki learned anything from having Weber there?
what a pathetic collection of talent for 25 years.
I'm not sure how to reply to this post since it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I'm sorry you're so upset with whatever you think the team is doing unrelated to hockey.
It really is...I don't know what PK did to this organization behind closed doors, but they're clearly still cheesed lol
Basically Price's Canadiens, and the trip to the finals doesn't impress me at all. Penguins handed us the first round, they just wanted to go home. It was an epic lining up of the stars, if we had been in our own division we would not have even made the playoffs.
So you agree with me? Caufield and Suzuki learned a lot from the last core? Especially the captain .That’s not what you said though. I saw a team with a bunch of losers like Hoffman and Drouin not give a damn as we sank to the worst season in Habs history. There was zero lasting effect of Weber’s magical leadership. It left the moment he did. He didn’t affect any change onto the club.
I’m glad he imprinted some lessons into Suzuki, it’s the least the captain can do to the next captain.
Yeah, Even one of the all time best ´Selke’ recipient ( Carbonneau) and our last 50 goal scorer ( Richer) would not crack the list. Same with Damphousse , Desjardins etc etc….The previous 25 years would just be a lineup full of players from the 70s... while sprinkling in Roy and chelios from the 80s.
You’re laughing at something I didn’t say. I think Weber made no lasting impact on the team. There is no evidence of it.So you agree with me? Caufield and Suzuki learned a lot from the last core? Especially the captain .
Like we all know that the habs team overachieved because they wanted to win for the captain and goalie.
If you think that didn’t have a long term impact on some of the guys idk what to tell you.
Also blaming Drouin for anything is just disingenuous. Team sank because we lost our entire core and fell apart to start the season.
Followed by the rookie coach and gm tearing the team apart so they could tank for the highest pick.
How you can call them a bunch of losers when most of the team is identical is hilarious to me
I can’t argue for something we can’t see I guess.You’re laughing at something I didn’t say. I think Weber made no lasting impact on the team. There is no evidence of it.
So that argument in his favour should be pulled.
You are correct, the Leaf's played them tough, it was the Jets that slept through the series because theuy wanted to go home. Terrible memory....These teams are not picked by the organization.
The Canadiens played the Maple Leafs in the first round.