Its not even for the fans. Its that each director finds the superheros dark past suffered at the hands of Machiavellian villains to be a part that they WANT to again deconstruct and put on screen. One figuring they could do the maudlin vaudeville scene better than another... Which really, when one looks at is, is what the whole comic book movie genre is about. A director figuring he could better the original product.
My own criticism of the genre is that its ALL redundant. Its one thing to put classic works of literature on screen as movies (usually disappointing anyway) but to put classic comics on the screen just evokes a period in time where Hollywood is setting the bar real low on inspiration and script worthiness. Its interesting that at a time where more brilliant writers exist, and are often left begging for work that Hollowwood is more swayed by comic sequels with scripts with less depth than the original comics offered.
Perhaps sensing they miss out on that depth of portrayal the directors always opt for those early formulative sequences. They're attempting to develop character. In comic book movies they often fail at that.
good points.
along the same lines, look at the new star wars movie.
I was always a huge star wars fan. the trailers looked great, lucas wasn't writing the thing. I was very excited to go see it.
I came out appreciating some of the special effects and seeing han solo and chewie, but overall I thought "meh"
the way people were talking, you'd think shakespeare wrote it. I was disappointed.
also maybe that's part of the problem, the over saturation of movies in media. Maybe I'd enjoy these movies more if I wasn't constantly bombarded with hype for many months before they open. and then the bombardment of reviews on social media.