The Michael Del Zotto is a delsaster.

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Trade Staal talk to me is crazy.

It's night and day the difference he makes to the Rangers defensive unit. "We've survived without him" is not a compelling argument. What does "survived" mean? If it means still being several hopes and prayers away from a Cup than I wouldn't be a fan of continuing to sign up for that. Yes, let's go through another year with Hamrlik/Bickel making crucial mistakes in the POs. Soundslike a great plan.

"We've survived without him" should be rephrased as "I kinda forget how good he is".

I agree. Not in a hurry to move Staal. Before he got hurt he was playing the best two way hockey of his career.
 
i have been supporting DZ and will continue to do so because he is young and is playing more physical. But something has to give.

When deciding on a D pair, they have to complement each other well.

McD - Girardi complement each other well. For those calling for Girardi to be traded, I don't think they fully appreciate what he brings. He plays a premium position that is tough to find, a top pairing, minute eating, shotblocking, stay at home RHD. And he plays well with either Staal or McD.

As to the second pair, you have to first decide who your RHD is, if it's Stralman, then Staal stays and DZ is expandable. My thought process here is Staal can help cover some of Stralman's miscues; he has no clue how to defend a 2 on 1, likes to venture up ice and with Staal, it'd give the freedom to use his skating and puck handling to support the offense.

DZ/Moore - Stralman is a disaster waiting to happen. They are all offensive Dmen who sometimes play out of position.

DZ/Moore - McIlrath will be a good pair because their style complements each other well. McIlrath is the stay at home Dman to the offensive Dmen the other 2 are.

Between Moore and DZ, I'd keep Moore because of the size, the more accurate shot and the caphit. With one condition, Moore needs to gain some muscle, I have seen him outmuscled too many times along the wall or infront of the net.

DZ should get a good return.

Therefore my D line up next season
McD - Girardi
Staal - Stralman
Moore - McIlrath
Eminger/X.

With DZ as the asset to trade.

I'd still trade for a young RHD with a good shot from the right side. There are 2 tiers here
Tier 1: Players without exemptions
McBain, Postma.
I'd trade for one of these and play them as the 7th D man/ PP specialist.
Tier 2: Players with exemptions
Savard, Goncharov.
i'd trade for one of these to put in the AHL and groom for the future. Hartford needs young Dmen and these guys have cannons from the point and play a physical kind of hockey.
RHD with a good shot are rare to find and i'd stock as many as i could.
This also gives the team more leverage when discussing Girardi's extension.
 
Personally, I don't consider Stralman an "offensive defenseman". If anything, I think his specialty is defensive play. He reminds me of Toni Lydman.

Very steady in his own end, rarely make mistakes, good breakout pass.
 
Personally, I don't consider Stralman an "offensive defenseman". If anything, I think his specialty is defensive play. He reminds me of Toni Lydman.

Very steady in his own end, rarely make mistakes, good breakout pass.

He has improved enough IMO to move from a bottom pairing Dman who can play on the top 4 in a pinch, to a top 4 Dman who needs a little help. And what convinced me is his ability to play the body and take a hit to make a play. He had a lot of courage to try to make that play against Lucic knowing he would get plastered.
Having Staal as his partner would help alleviate my concerns about his positional awareness.
 
You can't teach hockey IQ.

I want no part of stupid players. Trade him.

This.

Has nothing to do with his skill set. I can't even count how many times this season, let alone the post season, that Del Zotto just has a brain fart. He watches the puck come to him while a forward takes it. He gets the puck along the boards behind our own net and pins himself against the boards with it instead of advancing it up the boards. He's a bottom pairing d-man at best.

The kid is just stupid. Besides the fact that he can't hit the ****ing net, the kid is stupid. It's unfortunate, but it is what it is. I can't watch him make blunders any longer.
 
no way i trade him yet... i keep our core of d...i actually think it helps us when they struggle bc there next deals will be easy to afford... and keep the core together as long as possible..

i think if staal was in the lineup he wouldv'e been dz's rock and actually the d wouldv'e played so mcuh better with staal in the lineup.. torts/sully ride g and mcd way to much.. night in and night out you can't play 30min a game... should be around 25ish and spread the wealth.. DZ this off season should continue building up strength and shooting accuracy.. he is 22.. dont give me that hes vet and should know how to play.. theres a ton of d that came onto the scene late in their careers or late 20s.. jaybo/keith (26ish) etc.. could go on and on..

Mcd-Girardi
Staal-DZ
Moore-Stralman/ McIrath (I want the rook)

we need physical presence from McIrath and I pray sauer comes back next year..
 
Three things I dont understand:

1) Any comparisons at all to Brian Leetch with anyone on this current team. (are you over 20?) The man dominated the ice and was one of the most elegant breakout skaters of all time. We have nothing at all remotely like him.

2) Dan Girardi gets no credit. He is the best shot blocker D man in the Eastern Conference and a bulwark on defense. He has a rocket from the point which he has been coached to never use. He is consistently on against the teams best lines.

3) the kind of mistakes Del Zotto makes have nothing to do with a coach. He doesn't understand risk prevention and just seems like a hyped up young jock out there with no understand of the game. Its been a few seasons of this. His tenure of age defense is over. The kid is just not a good dman.
 
Speaking of tutoring young defensemen, where's Larry Robinson these days?

Robinson's contract ended with the New Jersey Devils in the summer of 2012. He indicated he was interested in becoming an assistant coach with the Montreal Canadiens, however that post was filled with former Hab J.J. Daigneault soon after. Robinson then was appointed an associate coach with the San Jose Sharks on July 10, 2012.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Robinson
 
Actually I think a significant part of the problem is our blueline is pathetically incapable of chipping in offensively. There has to be SOMETHING of offensive value sitting at the blueline.

Chipping in doesn't alway mean point production. McDonagh was the guy that was really moving the puck up the ice and keeping the play alive in the Boston end--way more than any other of our defenders. Stralman came next and then Girardi and Moore. Stralman getting hurt was a real blow.

Good right side defenseman are hard to find--real hard. No way would I even think about moving either Girardi or Stralman without a large overpayment. They'd be really tough to replace.
 
When some of you post your desired dmen lineups I wonder how you can think it's a good group with no defensemen capable of generating offense. I think McD is good enough to be a number two offensively but he is not asked to do that.
 
I think if they can get McDonagh locked up long term it's foolish to not try to move Del Zotto. I realize he may be the most offensively gifted D-man of the bunch, but of the five left-handed defenseman we've got in McDonagh, Staal, Stralman, Moore and MDZ, he's become my least favorite. He's sloppy, he's sporadic. While he has the offensive talent and can make great outlet passes, his decision making holds him back. To me he doesn't look like a guy that can run a powerplay. It's never about his ethic, which makes him hard to dislike, but his offensive upside should equal good value, and the depth at LD makes him expendable, and has for awhile. If the hope is McIlrath is ready the year after next, I don't know how you don't hope to have a healthy defense that looks like this:
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Stralman
Moore-McIlrath
 
I think if they can get McDonagh locked up long term it's foolish to not try to move Del Zotto. I realize he may be the most offensively gifted D-man of the bunch, but of the five left-handed defenseman we've got in McDonagh, Staal, Stralman, Moore and MDZ, he's become my least favorite. He's sloppy, he's sporadic. While he has the offensive talent and can make great outlet passes, his decision making holds him back. To me he doesn't look like a guy that can run a powerplay. It's never about his ethic, which makes him hard to dislike, but his offensive upside should equal good value, and the depth at LD makes him expendable, and has for awhile. If the hope is McIlrath is ready the year after next, I don't know how you don't hope to have a healthy defense that looks like this:
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Stralman
Moore-McIlrath

Stralman is a righty...
 
It's up and down with a lot of young players....especially PMD. For all the problems this is a kid with tremendous potential. Think about where Moore was before he came here. DZ is what, 23 in a few weeks? Relax people.
 
He's improved a lot defensively since his rookie season but the Rangers expected offense from him. They can get a decent return for him - do it.
 
My idea of a description of what a legit No. 1 1st pairing d-man is a guy who can create offense to the tune of about 50-60 points on average per year and play reasonably good in his own end. Like Montreal has two guys like that Markov and Subban--(though one of them is always getting injured). Other examples--Weber, Doughty, Pietrangelo, Karlsson, Chara, Streit, Letang, Green, Boyle. I'm forgetting a few. Some of these guys are older for sure but I don't see Del Zotto becoming on par with any of the above named. He's not even close to being the Rangers best defenseman right now (I'd easily take all of Staal, McDonagh, Girardi and Stralman over him) so comparisons to Leetch--a Calder trophy winner, a Conn Smythe winner, a Hall of Famer, a guy who almost always produced in the post season and for almost his entire career was the Rangers best d-man are really nonsensical.

The chances of Michael's ever becoming a legitimate No. 1 defenseman are pretty close to 0. Reality is Del Zotto is probably going to get better than he is now. How much more remains to be seen but I don't see him becoming a huge offensive producer--50 point range would be about my best estimate as far as he'll ever reach and that may just be in part due somewhat to the nature of defense first post Jagr Rangers teams. The thing is I don't see this guy ever becoming the face of the Rangers defense anyhow--even if our offense one day goes more high octane. He just doesn't have it to be a No. 1 d-man. He's tradable 'if' the right deal comes along.
 
When some of you post your desired dmen lineups I wonder how you can think it's a good group with no defensemen capable of generating offense. I think McD is good enough to be a number two offensively but he is not asked to do that.

I agree with this, verbatim. Throw a young, Righty, offensive d-man in that core, and things start looked really nice for the next 5~ years.
 
del Zotto is not incredible...he's not horrible...but he's incredibly, horribly inconsistent. You never know what you're going to get from him from one game to the next. That will drive any coach insane.
 
He's improved a lot defensively since his rookie season but the Rangers expected offense from him. They can get a decent return for him - do it.

I'm so tired of hearing this, it's been the same his whole career. He's 19, 20, 21, 22...Now is the time to act and trade him! While he's still young enough that some dope will believe he might just blossom into whatever it is you are waiting for him to blossom into.

Del Z is on a path to be completely run-of-the-mill around his 30th birthday. The big holes on the Rangers at point shot D and two-way C don't change at all with or without him...Trade him!

(Oh, and his physicality is totally overrated, it's a lot of spastic pushing and jumping BS, maybe it bothers someone now and then, but he's not a positional rock pushing people away he has to get his whole body into it to move anyone.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad