Deadpool8812
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2018
- 13,100
- 16,717
It was just a boring movie, really. You keep waiting for something big to happen, but it never came. The villain was also...bland
100% my experience. I had a group of 6 or so friends and we would go opening day to each movie. We tried to keep doing this after Endgame, but we lost a couple after Eternals and a couple after MoM. 1 friend completely checked out after the Capt America D+ series and the "do better" speech. The last opening I went to was Love and Thunder and by then it was just my wife and me. I wont go to an opening again after that. Now I either wait for good reviews to watch at the theatre (GotG3) or wait for it to stream (Marvels). Not worth my time/money/investment to potentially waste my evening.
And once you are out / no longer invested, it's extremely hard to get back in. What am I supposed to tell my die-hard MCU friends that stopped watching? Go spend a couple hours watching Ms. Marvel and a couple hours watching Captain Marvel and force torture yourself through Secret Invasion so we can go watch a movie together? I don't hate my friends that much.
If they really wanted to continue the MCU after endgame, they needed to focus on quality and not quantity. Right now, it just feels like they are trying to cash out quick while their created universe burns down.
To add perspective, Five Nights at Freddy's opened in theaters two weeks ago, during the actors' strike and simultaneously on streaming, and still took in $80M domestically in its opening weekend. As johnjm22 said, the latest projection for The Marvels is only $47M.
‘The Marvels’ Meltdown: Disney MCU Posts Lowest B.O. Opening Ever At $47M — What Went Wrong – Sunday Update
‘The Marvels’ is heading to the lowest opening ever for a Disney MCU pics at $47M-$55M. despite its stars’ last-minute promotion after the actors strike deal.deadline.com
That's why it's a meaningful comparison. It was much anticipated and this was not.That one was a much-anticipated horror franchise launching on Halloween weekend, I’m not sure there’s a meaningful comparison here.
This is a great way to sum up the problem IMO. This is what happened to me. I watched them all through End Game, and then a couple of the TV Shows (Loki S1, the one with Elizabeth Olsen, the Hawkeye/Arrow girl show, even the one where they introduced the new Captain America). I stopped midway through the one with the ancient Egyptian stuff and haven't watched any of the others. It was too much, and not entertaining enough to keep my interest (I can't even remember the names of them...). Around that time the same thing happened with the movies. I loved the new GotG. I watched the new Thor and was disappointed. I put The Eternals on in the background, technically watched it but don't remember much. Never got around to the other recent ones.100% my experience. I had a group of 6 or so friends and we would go opening day to each movie. We tried to keep doing this after Endgame, but we lost a couple after Eternals and a couple after MoM. 1 friend completely checked out after the Capt America D+ series and the "do better" speech. The last opening I went to was Love and Thunder and by then it was just my wife and me. I wont go to an opening again after that. Now I either wait for good reviews to watch at the theatre (GotG3) or wait for it to stream (Marvels). Not worth my time/money/investment to potentially waste my evening.
And once you are out / no longer invested, it's extremely hard to get back in. What am I supposed to tell my die-hard MCU friends that stopped watching? Go spend a couple hours watching Ms. Marvel and a couple hours watching Captain Marvel and force torture yourself through Secret Invasion so we can go watch a movie together? I don't hate my friends that much.
If they really wanted to continue the MCU after endgame, they needed to focus on quality and not quantity. Right now, it just feels like they are trying to cash out quick while their created universe burns down.
Part of this might be because of MCU fatigue and not as many homeruns for them of late but sadly for this specific movie part of it was the regular incels doing their best to trash the movie because it had Brie Larsson and 3 female leads. Not sue how many might have been deleted but when I looked at the it 2 days ago so many negative reviews were about that basically.That's why it's a meaningful comparison. It was much anticipated and this was not.
This movie was never going to do as well as the first one. First one got the boost being released in March before Avengers, so people wanted to see how she fit into the MCU. Giving it a nice bump.Part of this might be because of MCU fatigue and not as many homeruns for them of late but sadly for this specific movie part of it was the regular incels doing their best to trash the movie because it had Brie Larsson and 3 female leads. Not sue how many might have been deleted but when I looked at the it 2 days ago so many negative reviews were about that basically.
Captain Marvel starred Brie Larson and was trashed on release, yet made $1.1B. Avengers: Endgame came out after that and had Brie Larson, yet made $2.8B and became the highest grossing movie of all time. Black Panther: Wakanda Forever came out last year and had 3 female leads who were also black, yet made $860M and was the 6th-most successful movie of the year. This movie isn't struggling because of sexism and racism, but because moviegoers aren't interested in this particular movie for a variety of other reasons.Part of this might be because of MCU fatigue and not as many homeruns for them of late but sadly for this specific movie part of it was the regular incels doing their best to trash the movie because it had Brie Larsson and 3 female leads. Not sue how many might have been deleted but when I looked at the it 2 days ago so many negative reviews were about that basically.
I'm a big Marvel fan and I'm even having trouble keeping up with all the over-saturation.
Within the last month or two:
GotG 3 streams
Marvels
Loki 2
Echo trailer
Announcements of new movie release dates
It's non-stop and, IMO, hurting the overall product.
I know I might get accused of sexism for saying this, but I think men are less interested in female centric movies.Captain Marvel starred Brie Larson and was trashed on release, yet made $1.1B. Avengers: Endgame came out after that and had Brie Larson, yet made $2.8B and became the highest grossing movie of all time. Black Panther: Wakanda Forever came out last year and had 3 female leads who were also black, yet made $860M and was the 6th-most successful movie of the year. This movie isn't struggling because of sexism and racism, but because moviegoers aren't interested in this particular movie for a variety of other reasons.
Here's an article from March that I read a few days ago. It's a warning to be prepared for the "go woke, go broke" crowd to take credit if/when this movie flops, but it seems relevant because you're giving that crowd that credit by suggesting that the "incels" are part of the reason why the movie is failing. The article argues that it'll have failed for reasons other than that and that we should be honest about those reasons.
Don’t Blame Wokeness When The Marvels Fails
The Marvels combines a lot of factors, and a silly name, which suggest it could be the MCU's first major flop. Don't blame wokeness if it iswww.thegamer.com
The audience for The Marvels this weekend was 61% male, comparable to male-led Marvel filmsI know I might get accused of sexism for saying this, but I think men are less interested in female centric movies.
This isn't to say men don't like movies with female leads, many films with female leads garner a large male audience (Rogue One, TFA, Aliens, and so on). But there's a difference between a film with a female lead, and female centric film; or a movie that feels like it's made for a female audience.
I don't think this is the main reason it's failing. The Flash and Blue Beetle failed recently as well. But I do think women are more likely to see a "guy movie" like Gladiator or Top Gun, than men are to see a "chick flick".
The Marvels isn't a "chick flick", but it does kind of feel like a super hero movie for girls.
As always, it's not a single reason. I agree with these 3 factors you've listed. It's a combination of things.The audience for The Marvels this weekend was 61% male, comparable to male-led Marvel films
Marvel Taught Us That Movies Need to Be Events, but the MCU No Longer Qualifies
"The Marvels" is a disaster while "Priscilla" and "The Holdovers" both stay strong. "Dream Scenario" and "Tiger 3" open strong.www.indiewire.com
I don't think that there's any reason to doubt the conventional wisdom that
1. Disney released way too much Marvel in a small window
2. Captain Marvel only succeeded because of the timing of the film before Endgame
3. Movie-going habits have changed
The audience for The Marvels this weekend was 61% male, comparable to male-led Marvel films
Marvel Taught Us That Movies Need to Be Events, but the MCU No Longer Qualifies
"The Marvels" is a disaster while "Priscilla" and "The Holdovers" both stay strong. "Dream Scenario" and "Tiger 3" open strong.www.indiewire.com
I don't think that there's any reason to doubt the conventional wisdom that
1. Disney released way too much Marvel in a small window
2. Captain Marvel only succeeded because of the timing of the film before Endgame
3. Movie-going habits have changed
I think the stock price has become the driver sadly due to other areas of disney's vast empire not doing very well. The media segment of Disney is the main driver for them these days, not the parks or IP stuff etc.They're so damned greedy and so incompetent.
I guess it depends on whether you care about any kind of lasting legacy or just the current stock price.
Whether or not they succeed that's kind of the point though. Disney is selling to a global market place so when they have the white guy market cornered with Stark/Rogers/Thor/Parker/etc, so they try to seek growth in other markets. Which is why Brie Larson's Captain Marvel is a character that maybe little girls will look up to (again whether or not that works is beside the point), and not some big boobed blond in spandex and high heels.I know I might get accused of sexism for saying this, but I think men are less interested in female centric movies.
This isn't to say men don't like movies with female leads, many films with female leads garner a large male audience (Rogue One, TFA, Aliens, and so on). But there's a difference between a film with a female lead, and female centric film; or a movie that feels like it's made for a female audience.
I don't think this is the main reason it's failing. The Flash and Blue Beetle failed recently as well. But I do think women are more likely to see a "guy movie" like Gladiator or Top Gun, than men are to see a "chick flick".
The Marvels isn't a "chick flick", but it does kind of feel like a super hero movie for girls.