The Lightning have what the Maple Leafs want. It might just be a matter of time | The Star
Leafs fans and critics of the team are dwelling on the negative: salary structure and the inability of the stars to produce over the final three games against Montreal in the opening round. Leafs GM Kyle Dubas, who replaced Lou Lamoriello in 2018, appears to be taking a page out of BriseBois’s playbook: sticking with it.
By re-signing Wayne Simmonds and Jason Spezza, and signalling they’re open to talks with pending free agents Frederik Andersen and Zach Hyman, Dubas is showing faith in everything that has taken them this far. Of course, five opening-round playoff losses in a row is not far enough, but Dubas isn’t taking advice from his naysayers. Significant change doesn’t appear to be in the cards.
Similarities between the Leafs and Lightning include:
•
Heavy investment in player and staff development at the minor-league level. Both Cooper and Leafs coach Sheldon Keefe were “called up” from the minors after winning the Calder Cup.
•
Salary-cap creativity, including using the long-term injured reserve to maximum advantage.
Significant differences:
•
Draft philosophy. The Leafs have valued offence over defence.
•
Size on the blue line. The Lightning defence is two inches taller and 20 pounds heavier on average. Leaf Morgan Rielly is six-foot-one, 219 pounds. The Lightning’s Victor Hedman is six-foot-six, 241 pounds.
•
In net. With apologies to Jack Campbell and Andersen, no Leafs goalie compares to Andrei Vasilevskiy.
•
Age. Most of Tampa’s best players are in their late 20s or older. The Leafs’ core skews younger with Auston Matthews (22), Mitch Marner (23), William Nylander (24) and Rielly (26).
With age comes experience. This is how Cooper described the growth of Kucherov, now 28 and leading all playoff scorers with 32 points in 21 games.