The Loss of Broberg and Holloway Gripe Thread

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
87,484
37,594
Well since it's still somewhat fresh and it's obviously pissed off a lot of people here's a thread to keep this discussion in so that it doesn't spill into other threads.

My take is that Broberg can f*** right off and keep on f***ing off. He never had the stones to come in here and earn a job in camp based on his play and then demanded a trade. He wasn't the player that he was in the playoffs for us at any point prior to that and obviously needed that extra time in Bako whether he wants to admit it or not. Food for him that he's off to a good start. We'll see how he does once other teams start to get the book on him and playing him physical consistently.

For Holloway he likely thought that he was a big enough piece that we'd match him and well that didn't exactly work out for him. I liked the player but it is what it is.
 

Mr Kot

Registered User
Jan 15, 2022
5,385
12,244
1725936440094560.jpg
 

Sheikyerbouti

ShakeyerMcBooty
Nov 4, 2006
1,568
1,661
Van isle
I'm more upset at Holloway, it was less than a million. But from his POV, the Oilers went out and got a few wingers that were blocking his upward mobility.

The biggest issue is why the Oilers did not see this coming when on HFboards we were worried about offersheets on July 1st. They clearly did not factor it, or they believed skinner and arvy were worth losing the other pieces. Either way it was a clear mistake by jackson, and it hurt us
 

AM

Registered User
Nov 22, 2004
8,682
2,707
Edmonton
I'm more upset at Holloway, it was less than a million. But from his POV, the Oilers went out and got a few wingers that were blocking his upward mobility.

The biggest issue is why the Oilers did not see this coming when on HFboards we were worried about offersheets on July 1st. They clearly did not factor it, or they believed skinner and arvy were worth losing the other pieces. Either way it was a clear mistake by jackson, and it hurt us
The oilers are in win now mode. Paying youth was never in the books.
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
49,208
63,452
Islands in the stream.
The oilers are in win now mode. Paying youth was never in the books.
Seems to me several clubs that have won SC's have youth and ELC's in their lineups and often even taking on a significant role. I don't get this its one or the other and that only vets can play for contenders.

I don't follow either how the players that the Oilers obtained in offseason connote more to win now mode than the players they lost. Indeed several of the players they lost had strong SC finals.
 

McAsuno

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
27,359
37,414
Edmonton
Broberg was never gonna stay. Wish we kept Holloway at least.
That's as plainly as I'd put it.

Wonder if we will do the same offersheet and target STL Joel Hofer though.
 

Mr Kot

Registered User
Jan 15, 2022
5,385
12,244
Seems to me several clubs that have won SC's have youth and ELC's in their lineups and often even taking on a significant role. I don't get this its one or the other and that only vets can play for contenders.

I don't follow either how the players that the Oilers obtained in offseason connote more to win now mode than the players they lost. Indeed several of the players they lost had strong SC finals.

Yeah I don't know where this idea came from that the lineup has to have vets up and down the lineup. It's a cap world and ELC/Young hungry players on cheap contracts is how teams stay competitive. Always said that we should let some of our prospects have a shot on the 4th line/3rd pairing over the usual disappointers. Apparently management still disagrees with that sentiment, even though everyone else does it. Another "we are smarter than everyone else in the league" mindset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drivesaitl

Chet Manley

Registered User
Apr 15, 2007
3,624
1,802
Regina, SK
I'm more upset at Holloway, it was less than a million. But from his POV, the Oilers went out and got a few wingers that were blocking his upward mobility.

The biggest issue is why the Oilers did not see this coming when on HFboards we were worried about offersheets on July 1st. They clearly did not factor it, or they believed skinner and arvy were worth losing the other pieces. Either way it was a clear mistake by jackson, and it hurt us
The only way it makes sense that Broberg or Holloway were neither signed or traded at an unsigned RFA discount was that Jackson played hardball with them thinking that barging bin UFAs were going to be available. Jackson left it up to the UFA market to decide whether to pay up on the RFAs later or to continue playing hardball with them despite the risk of offersheets. Someone being clever instead of treating players like people and alienating them. Something like that, wtf do I know about Jackson's brain.
 

AM

Registered User
Nov 22, 2004
8,682
2,707
Edmonton
Seems to me several clubs that have won SC's have youth and ELC's in their lineups and often even taking on a significant role. I don't get this its one or the other and that only vets can play for contenders.

I don't follow either how the players that the Oilers obtained in offseason connote more to win now mode than the players they lost. Indeed several of the players they lost had strong SC finals.
Wait a couple games.
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
49,208
63,452
Islands in the stream.
Yeah I don't know where this idea came from that the lineup has to have vets up and down the lineup. It's a cap world and ELC/Young hungry players on cheap contracts is how teams stay competitive. Always said that we should let some of our prospects have a shot on the 4th line/3rd pairing over the usual disappointers. Apparently management still disagrees with that sentiment, even though everyone else does it. Another "we are smarter than everyone else in the league" mindset.
For sure. In playoffs last year seems like the teams that gave us some problems, Vancouver, Dallas, they had some youth in lineup, and In Dallas that youth transformed what that club was doing last season and playoffs and became big contributing parts of the club. Without the youth movement in Dallas they are first round fodder.

Somewhere along the line this org fairly abandoned development and went instead with an accrual of NHL vets strategy. Partly wonder whether its a vestige of the times the Oilers were a have not club and always went up against loaded vet teams precap. Strange thought but we now seem to be that team having nothing but vets in lineups. We're like the longtooth Dallas Stars of the late 90's now
 

AM

Registered User
Nov 22, 2004
8,682
2,707
Edmonton
Yeah I don't know where this idea came from that the lineup has to have vets up and down the lineup. It's a cap world and ELC/Young hungry players on cheap contracts is how teams stay competitive. Always said that we should let some of our prospects have a shot on the 4th line/3rd pairing over the usual disappointers. Apparently management still disagrees with that sentiment, even though everyone else does it. Another "we are smarter than everyone else in the league" mindset.
Except they weren’t cap relief. They could have been but choose not to.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad