Fable is getting a reboot? That sounds promising, I liked the first one on OG Xbox and didn't play the other ones cuz both were on 360 I believe
Persona 4 Golden (PC): 9.5/10
This is one of those games that leaves you wonder what you are going to do with your life now that it's over. Unfortunately I had the plot spoiled for me a long time ago but I still thoroughly enjoyed all 80+ hours of it. The PC port is also decent enough (arbitrary framerate support is nice). The only thing preventing me from giving this game a 10 is that Persona 5 exists and improved on almost everything this game did. I'll be playing through the game on NG+ to get all achievements before Persona 5 Royal releases in October.
It's been a while since I played 5 (never finished Royal either) so I'll have to reevaluate when the game is rereleased. I do think I like the group dynamic more in 4 than 5 though. I played 3 (FES) a very long time ago but didn't complete it, I know there are some mods for the game to enable widescreen and such so I may give that another shot before Royal is out.5 had the social links and all that down but both 3 and 4 have better stories and characters from what i remember, imo.
I just got a PS3 again so maybe I should fire up my digital copies of those two replay, it's been awhile since I played either lol
I never got around to this one. Looking forward to playing it when it comes to Switch.Persona 4 Golden (PC): 9.5/10
This is one of those games that leaves you wondering what you are going to do with your life now that it's over. Unfortunately I had the plot spoiled for me a long time ago but I still thoroughly enjoyed all 80+ hours of it. The PC port is also decent enough (arbitrary framerate support is nice). The only thing preventing me from giving this game a 10 is that Persona 5 exists and improved on almost everything this game did. I'll be playing through the game on NG+ to get all achievements before Persona 5 Royal releases in October.
Red Dead Redemption II - 6/10
Objectively it's a good game. It's just not for me.
This was my second crack at playing it. I was so utterly bored with it the first time I gave up on it probably less than 5hrs in, but someone convinced me it was worth pushing through. So I did and just did the main missions until it clicked. It took getting to like the half way point, but I eventually did start to enjoy it. Even started doing some of the side missions. What it does well, it does really well. The amount of detail is truly incredible and unlike anything I've seen in a video game before. The characters are also very well written and fleshed out. It does make you want to spend some time with them and see how their story plays out.
But what it does poorly makes it a chore to play. Everything is soooooo slow. The animations to skin an animal or that type of stuff is one thing. I get it, they want it to seem more realistic, have you slow down, and get immersed. Fine, but being forced to walk THAT slow in camp or in buildings made me want to stab myself with a spoon. Want to pick up that apple on the table? Better make sure you make the right approach or else you'll have to circle back so that you're a few more inches to the left because...ya know...realism. The gunplay just sucks. I don't know how else to put it. On top of all that, open world/sandbox games aren't my cup of tea to begin with.
As far as the story, like I said it took probably half way to get invested. Then you get thrown into a new area for some reason. Maybe it ties into the first game or something, but I didn't get it. Seemed unnecessary and other than a few conversations as your riding to the next mission, it never gets brought up again. I enjoyed finishing out the story and thought it was pretty good, except they didn't tie it all up and instead go into the epilogue. The epilogue was painful. Literally a chore simulator. They do tie up some of the loose ends, but I think it would have been much better and more impactful to do it in the main story. The only parts of the epilogue I enjoyed was the montage where you build a house and the Willie Nelson cinematic. The rest of it was a drag and reminded me of TLOU Part 2 where they tack on more unnecessary story just to get a few more hours of gameplay.
Although I did eventually get some enjoyment out of it, I'd only recommend it if you like sandbox type games. If you like combat or want a good narrative, then it's not worth it. The story is good, it just takes too much time and effort for what you get out of it IMO.
Regarding the epilogue, it's a build up to RDR 1. As someone who absolutely loves both games, especially the first, the epilogue was pure joy as it shows a lot of backstory.Red Dead Redemption II - 6/10
Objectively it's a good game. It's just not for me.
This was my second crack at playing it. I was so utterly bored with it the first time I gave up on it probably less than 5hrs in, but someone convinced me it was worth pushing through. So I did and just did the main missions until it clicked. It took getting to like the half way point, but I eventually did start to enjoy it. Even started doing some of the side missions. What it does well, it does really well. The amount of detail is truly incredible and unlike anything I've seen in a video game before. The characters are also very well written and fleshed out. It does make you want to spend some time with them and see how their story plays out.
But what it does poorly makes it a chore to play. Everything is soooooo slow. The animations to skin an animal or that type of stuff is one thing. I get it, they want it to seem more realistic, have you slow down, and get immersed. Fine, but being forced to walk THAT slow in camp or in buildings made me want to stab myself with a spoon. Want to pick up that apple on the table? Better make sure you make the right approach or else you'll have to circle back so that you're a few more inches to the left because...ya know...realism. The gunplay just sucks. I don't know how else to put it. On top of all that, open world/sandbox games aren't my cup of tea to begin with.
As far as the story, like I said it took probably half way to get invested. Then you get thrown into a new area for some reason. Maybe it ties into the first game or something, but I didn't get it. Seemed unnecessary and other than a few conversations as your riding to the next mission, it never gets brought up again. I enjoyed finishing out the story and thought it was pretty good, except they didn't tie it all up and instead go into the epilogue. The epilogue was painful. Literally a chore simulator. They do tie up some of the loose ends, but I think it would have been much better and more impactful to do it in the main story. The only parts of the epilogue I enjoyed was the montage where you build a house and the Willie Nelson cinematic. The rest of it was a drag and reminded me of TLOU Part 2 where they tack on more unnecessary story just to get a few more hours of gameplay.
Although I did eventually get some enjoyment out of it, I'd only recommend it if you like sandbox type games. If you like combat or want a good narrative, then it's not worth it. The story is good, it just takes too much time and effort for what you get out of it IMO.
For sure. Objectively it's better than 6/10. I just didn't enjoy playing it that much.These are, point for point, exactly my thoughts on RDR2. I gave it a 8/10, because clearly effort was put into it and I tried to stay objective, but I feel your 6/10 score reflects perfectly how "fun" it ended up being for me. I wish I stopped playing early in the game. I didnt finish the epilogue though, I could only take so much.