Levitate
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2004
- 31,436
- 8,774
Andrew Gross said:Kreider says he's fine. Sore jaw. Pulled his head up from Orpik hit just in time.
Exactly what I thought it was
Andrew Gross said:Kreider says he's fine. Sore jaw. Pulled his head up from Orpik hit just in time.
Obviously he will, I mean he's not playing with Boyle anymore.
Good to see Kreider on the ice, but I really don't like stacking the top line like that.
I still think it might be better to have Kreider-Richards-Gaborik on the top line and Nash-Stepan-Callahan on the second line.
If Hagelin starts playing a little smarter he will probably move up in to the top 6
Kreider struggles on the thirdline against 3rd pair d and 3rd line offense and now you want him in the top line against 1st pair and 1stline? ugh...
Kreider struggles on the thirdline against 3rd pair d and 3rd line offense and now you want him in the top line against 1st pair and 1stline? ugh...
Kreider struggles on the thirdline against 3rd pair d and 3rd line offense and now you want him in the top line against 1st pair and 1stline? ugh...
Moving up a struggling player to see if better linemates can get his ass in motion is not exactly a revolutionary move. In fact, it's rather textbook.
...and it usually means trouble.
Because very good to great hockey players can make an impact anywhere they play. They're the ones making their linemates better, not vice versa.
Chris Kreider is not currently a very good to great hockey player and might never be, who knows? Even if he never is I'll gladly take a complimentary talent with the star players we already have on the team.
I hope he becomes a star but I see Kreider panning out as more of a complimentary talent.
I agree. Its time to acknowledge we likely have more of a Brandon Dubinsky-type player in Kreider than the outlandish 40/40 prediction thats have been prevalent on this board.
If this franchise can keep developing those types of players and use them in trades like the Nash one, they'll be in good shape.
I agree. Its time to acknowledge we likely have more of a Brandon Dubinsky-type player in Kreider than the outlandish 40/40 prediction thats have been prevalent on this board.
If this franchise can keep developing those types of players and use them in trades like the Nash one, they'll be in good shape.
Wayyyyy to early to acknowledge anything about him.
Its too early to say hes more Brandon Dubinsky than a 40/40 or 35/35 player?
I think he'll fall in between (closer to Dubinsky levels) which is perfectly fine with me. But the #'s carelessly thrown around here would make him a star player - and I dont think we have that on our hands.
How can you make any sort of decision so early?
Because the smart money is on Chris Kreider not becoming a star, which is fine. I think he can be a very good player 25/25 type of guy that can max out at 30 goals per season. A very good top 6 player.
Hes not going to be a star, hes not going to be a 40/40 guy. Theres only a handful of players in the league these days capable of those numbers and their performance pops out in regards to everything they do. Those expectations/predictions for Kreider were as unfair then as they are now.
To be fair, those 40/40 predictions were few and far between. I've always believed his upside is similar to Max Pacioretty's. 30-ish goals and 60-ish points in his best seasons. Patches was more Brandon Dubinsky than 35/35 guy until he finally put it all together after several unremarkable professional seasons.
You have to think that Kreider is feeling the pressure a little bit. After the impact he made in the post-season, the bar has been set insanely high -- not only by the fans but by the media and the Rangers personnel as well. Betwen McGuire's "star being born on broadway" comments and Nash's "He has all the tools to be a superstar" quote the other day, I can't even begin to imagine what's going on in his head. However, I think we owe it to him to give him more than two games before we come to any conclusions about where his upside ultimately is.
To be fair, those 40/40 predictions were few and far between. I've always believed his upside is similar to Max Pacioretty's. 30-ish goals and 60-ish points in his best seasons. Patches was more Brandon Dubinsky than 35/35 guy until he finally put it all together after several unremarkable professional seasons.
You have to think that Kreider is feeling the pressure a little bit. After the impact he made in the post-season, the bar has been set insanely high -- not only by the fans but by the media and the Rangers personnel as well. Betwen McGuire's "star being born on broadway" comments and Nash's "He has all the tools to be a superstar" quote the other day, I can't even begin to imagine what's going on in his head. However, I think we owe it to him to give him more than two games before we come to any conclusions about where his upside ultimately is.
I have to agree with Torts. Hit was legal. He needs to keep head up.