Misery74
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2017
- 2,518
- 2,482
NYR hired the worst possible coach for this situation. Get ready for some ugliness.
Lafreniere is a NHL player but he's 100% a bust for where he was drafted and where his expectations were at.
He's a bland guy who doesn't do anything particularly well. Okay 3rd line guy but you don't want an okay 3rd line guy with the #1 pick.
You cant be serious. This is about raw talent and ability and Lafreneir doesn't have it.Big market teams jumping up in the lottery to nab great players just to ruin them.
A tale as old as time.
Then it’s hard to call him a bust. An impressive disappointment? Sure. Not really a bust. It’s like Daigle, he actually put up pretty good points for his age, he just wasn’t the superstar he was supposed to be. He’s not really a bust at all. Laf being a middle six player for years isn’t a bust in my eyes either.
To me a bust barely or never makes the level at all. If someone carved out a career it’s a just a disappointment.
Sorry, but this is just nonsense.The likelihood of all the major scouting services being this wrong on a #1 and #2 in the same draft year is extraordinarily unlikely.
Both Lafreniere and Byfield were clearly mishandled by two teams trying to have their cake and eat it, too. Both the Rangers and Kings went through a truncated rebuild-not-rebuild and quickly pivoted to bringing in prime players to compete now. They left their bluechip youth stranded in depth roles that didn’t suit their draft pedigree and didn’t foster quality development at the NHL level.
Contrast that with teams like the Devils or Senators who just accepted they would suck for X amount of years, but in the meantime placed their bluechip youth in positions to take ownership of the team.
Obviously it’s more complex and nuanced than that in totality, and yes, perhaps neither Laf nor Byfield were quite as good as the scouting reports claimed. But both of these prospects were clearly mismanaged by bad GMs who were much more interested in making the playoffs than fostering bluechip development at the NHL level.
NYR hired the worst possible coach for this situation. Get ready for some ugliness.
An ECHL level player and a 3rd rounder.What is his value now ? Seriously I think the highest bid would be a late 2nd or 3rd rounder. Or another struggling asset. I was high on the Canucks getting him but now I don't want him. He would be another Bouvillier.
What was Yakupovs trade again. Yak had offensive upside. Laf doesn't.
Sorry, but this is just nonsense.
Talent always shines through, no matter how their team manages their usages.
Blaming Rangers or Kings management for Laf and Byfield’s mediocre careers thus far is nonsense.
Why do some sports fans always blame their management when players fail to live up to their potential? Does it make you feel better?
Team management can affect a players development to an extent but they don’t turn stars to 3rd liners or 3rd liners into stars.
Sorry, but this is just nonsense.
Talent always shines through, no matter how their team manages their usages.
Blaming Rangers or Kings management for Laf and Byfield’s mediocre careers thus far is nonsense.
Why do some sports fans always blame their management when players fail to live up to their potential? Does it make you feel better?
Team management can affect a players development to an extent but they don’t turn stars to 3rd liners or 3rd liners into stars.
I think slaf surpasses him as the biggest bust especially if we are cutting it off at 22 years old
He'll correct me if I'm wrong, but what the other poster meant is that Lavi will give the young players opportunities but they will likely be on a short leash and will lose those top 6 spots if the results don't come quickly. And they won't be able to win those spots back.Lavi started Kakko at 1RW and moved Laf from LW to RW to get him into the top six as well. Lavi is giving them a full opportunity here.
We're playing great.NYR hired the worst possible coach for this situation. Get ready for some ugliness.
It's not all on management, sure. But this idea that you either hit or miss on a draft, and the player has a fate set in stone when he's 18 years old and he cannot be developed (or mishandled) is absurd.Sorry, but this is just nonsense.
Talent always shines through, no matter how their team manages their usages.
Blaming Rangers or Kings management for Laf and Byfield’s mediocre careers thus far is nonsense.
Why do some sports fans always blame their management when players fail to live up to their potential? Does it make you feel better?
Team management can affect a players development to an extent but they don’t turn stars to 3rd liners or 3rd liners into stars.
Are you talking about the AHL or something when you refer to half the league?He is far from that bad. To be honest he is better than at least half the league.