Why would I be salty about the Islanders being there as opposed to the Flyers or Habs or Pens or Caps or whoever?
Look, I can appreciate a tactical hockey game. There were a number of occasions in Game 5 where the play flowed for minutes at a time, which is pretty good hockey, but there were no real scoring chances because the two teams were in a chess match to dominate the middle of the ice. I get all that.
But come on, let's not pretend that that style of hockey is just as entertaining as trading scoring opportunities and letting the game be determined on skill. Nobody is such a hockey purist that they are more interested in a failed zone entry than in an odd-man rush. Even if you appreciate the tactical discipline of that style, it's not exciting. It's just not.