Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - season begins!

dzubrus8

Registered User
Jun 15, 2014
431
270
Definitely a weird journey for Strome.

Drafted by Arizona in 2015 when Don Maloney was the GM. Maloney is canned less than a year later and replaced by John Chayka. Strome never seemed like a Chayka guy / he really coveted Nick Schmaltz; Strome is traded around Thanksgiving 2018 before playing a full season with the Coyotes.

Then Chicago goes through the Kyle Beech scandal and Stan Bowman resigns in 2021. New management group comes in and they basically decide to go scorched Earth. Strome had been in the dog house before getting some traction with DeBrincat-Kane in 2021-22. But I think there was some healthy skepticism about whether Strome was just a passenger on that line. They decided to trade DeBrincat at the 2022 Draft and Kane was going into the last year of his contract. They tried to trade Strome but nobody was biting; Strome had to wait until Day 2 of free agency that year to land a contract, so he probably wasn't Plan A for a lot of clubs.
Always love reading your posts you have a great recollection of hockey history. That context makes more sense

Obviously would love to get a Dylan Strome for free but seems exceedingly rare based on your story
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
No way we go with a D corps that young. Luke would be 23, Silayev 20, Casey 22, and Nemec 22.

The reasons I see them moving on from Nemec and / or Casey are:
- age
- size
- cost efficiency

Age: Nemec and Casey are super young on a team that wants to win now. You've already got Luke making his young kid mistakes. Can you afford more? Maybe you could integrate one more into a bottom pair role, but not both.

Size: Nemec and Casey are the smallest guys of the group, and neither play a particularly physical style. As we see right now, Fitz / Keefe are actually preferring to have everyone with size / physicality vs working Nemec or Casey in. (You can say Luke isn't that physical - but then do you think Fitz / Keefe want a second guy like that?)

Cost: Guys who are drafted #2OA (Nemec) or who put up points (Casey) tend to get paid. But, the Devils don't really need the pedigree or the points. Meanwhile, every year there are available defensive D who can thrive when given a clear role in a structured system - and they make relative peanuts. See Kovacevic this year. Obviously, you're not likely to get a top 4 guy dumpster diving, but solving for 3RD is realistic. And then go find another guy like Pesce - again not flashy, but big, steady, and not breaking the bank.

These are the reasons why I thought they moved Bahl too early. He actually fit into what Fitz is trying to build. I think the Devils go looking for his equivalent on the right side.
If Bahl was more consistently physical and dropped the gloves I think he's still a Devil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tailfins

NJDfan86

Registered User
Dec 29, 2021
957
1,295
With respect to trading Nemec - who are the trading partners? Who is giving up a young C or RW on an ELC that makes dealing from a position of strength the play at this point? I totally understand the thought process but who other than Anaheim and San Jose have forwards like that to spare?

Also - probably want to see more than 15 games of Kovy before going all in on him as a keeper.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Whaddagoal

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
29,429
52,751
NJ
No way we go with a D corps that young. Luke would be 23, Silayev 20, Casey 22, and Nemec 22.

The reasons I see them moving on from Nemec and / or Casey are:
- age
- size
- cost efficiency

Age: Nemec and Casey are super young on a team that wants to win now. You've already got Luke making his young kid mistakes. Can you afford more? Maybe you could integrate one more into a bottom pair role, but not both.

Size: Nemec and Casey are the smallest guys of the group, and neither play a particularly physical style. As we see right now, Fitz / Keefe are actually preferring to have everyone with size / physicality vs working Nemec or Casey in. (You can say Luke isn't that physical - but then do you think Fitz / Keefe want a second guy like that?)

Cost: Guys who are drafted #2OA (Nemec) or who put up points (Casey) tend to get paid. But, the Devils don't really need the pedigree or the points. Meanwhile, every year there are available defensive D who can thrive when given a clear role in a structured system - and they make relative peanuts. See Kovacevic this year. Obviously, you're not likely to get a top 4 guy dumpster diving, but solving for 3RD is realistic. And then go find another guy like Pesce - again not flashy, but big, steady, and not breaking the bank.

These are the reasons why I thought they moved Bahl too early. He actually fit into what Fitz is trying to build. I think the Devils go looking for his equivalent on the right side.
Size is not a consideration for Nemec, not sure why you’re implying he’s small. He’s 6-1 and listed at 190, will be over 200 within the next few years. This all just seems made up, there is no pressure to “move on” from any of these young players nor much reason to do so. You’re talking about 20 year olds.
 

R8Devs

1-5-6-12
Nov 20, 2010
21,185
4,663
New Jersey
No way we go with a D corps that young. Luke would be 23, Silayev 20, Casey 22, and Nemec 22.

The reasons I see them moving on from Nemec and / or Casey are:
- age
- size
- cost efficiency

Age: Nemec and Casey are super young on a team that wants to win now. You've already got Luke making his young kid mistakes. Can you afford more? Maybe you could integrate one more into a bottom pair role, but not both.

Size: Nemec and Casey are the smallest guys of the group, and neither play a particularly physical style. As we see right now, Fitz / Keefe are actually preferring to have everyone with size / physicality vs working Nemec or Casey in. (You can say Luke isn't that physical - but then do you think Fitz / Keefe want a second guy like that?)

Cost: Guys who are drafted #2OA (Nemec) or who put up points (Casey) tend to get paid. But, the Devils don't really need the pedigree or the points. Meanwhile, every year there are available defensive D who can thrive when given a clear role in a structured system - and they make relative peanuts. See Kovacevic this year. Obviously, you're not likely to get a top 4 guy dumpster diving, but solving for 3RD is realistic. And then go find another guy like Pesce - again not flashy, but big, steady, and not breaking the bank.

These are the reasons why I thought they moved Bahl too early. He actually fit into what Fitz is trying to build. I think the Devils go looking for his equivalent on the right side.
they drafted 2 of those guys top 5 and the other top 10. if it's not in their plans to go young on D then they could have deviated at draft time but they didn't so they knew it was going to be like that at some point. And anyway by the time Silayev comes in to the NHL both Hughes and Nemec will have multiple years of NHL experience so they wouldn't be traditional young D. It's not like they are going 3 or 4 defenseman that are rookies/guys with 1 year of experience.

If you're talking about cost efficiency Nemec and Casey are far more likely to exceed their cap hits than good defenseman they sign in UFA. Nemec has another year after this at ELC and then after that both a bridge and/or long term deal are contracts he'd be poised to exceed as he won't have arbitration rights coming at the expiration of his deal. Casey's contract will also only expire after 26-27 so they have plenty of time before that too and he's likely not getting PP1 time or prime 5v5 minutes before then so he's probably not going to put up big numbers before his ELC ends.

Also if Nemec and/or Casey become guys that need gigantic contracts that means they have become players you move other players for to accommodate so I'm really not seeing the risk here in keeping them. You're basically saying for the Devils to trade them before they reach peak value in their current contracts.

They signed Pesce to a long term deal and he's not a physical guy, nor is Hamilton so I don't really get the assertion that they wouldn't be able to fit those guys in the lineup because they aren't physical.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,254
2,810
With respect to trading Nemec - who are the trading partners? Who is giving up a young C or RW on an ELC that makes dealing from a position of strength the play at this point? I totally understand the thought process but who other than Anaheim and San Jose have forwards like that to spare?

Also - probably want to see more than 15 games of Kovy before going all in on him as a keeper.
I'd be ballsy enough to offer Kovacevic an extension now on hopes it becomes a bargain asset, being low risk even if he's a number 7. He gets security for a guy who's yet to make above league minimum and in exchange we get that potential bargain.

But you don't move Nemec
 

woody footbreaker

Registered User
Mar 12, 2018
38
20
i should have written that i absolutely think Kovy should get a contract from us, actually the day the trade was announced, i thought Fitz should try to sign on the cheap, he still should and i think a bridge deal could make sense for both sides. He is better then just a 3rd pairing and exactly the type of player you need for the playoffs. We cant just go with Dillon being the only guy physical back there. Gives us more options when it comes to move Douggie or one of the prospects.

As some of you wrote, there is not many teams willing to trade a potential 2nd line center and i rather go for higher quality as this could turn us into a real contender. I dont see any other chance with the cap space available the next two years.

again a 9AO center in a deep draft with one more year ELC then Nemec, that would help the team more then waiting for Nemec seems like a fair deal and if we get an additional pick even better.
Detroit just sticks out and Danielson really seems the perfect fit for the Devils. They would also be potential trade partners when it comes to moving Douggie, but that contract could be more difficult to move given the 10team trade list.

There is pro and cons for both Casey and Nemec, when it comes to who of the two should be moved.
i would like to see Fitz being active this time and not wait until we get even more injuries.
Friedman mentioned Bosten could move Frederick and i saw Geekie was a healthy scratch last game, they both would be great to have too
 

tailfins

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 20, 2005
2,790
1,786
they drafted 2 of those guys top 5 and the other top 10. if it's not in their plans to go young on D then they could have deviated at draft time but they didn't so they knew it was going to be like that at some point. And anyway by the time Silayev comes in to the NHL both Hughes and Nemec will have multiple years of NHL experience so they wouldn't be traditional young D. It's not like they are going 3 or 4 defenseman that are rookies/guys with 1 year of experience.

If you're talking about cost efficiency Nemec and Casey are far more likely to exceed their cap hits than good defenseman they sign in UFA. Nemec has another year after this at ELC and then after that both a bridge and/or long term deal are contracts he'd be poised to exceed as he won't have arbitration rights coming at the expiration of his deal. Casey's contract will also only expire after 26-27 so they have plenty of time before that too and he's likely not getting PP1 time or prime 5v5 minutes before then so he's probably not going to put up big numbers before his ELC ends.

Also if Nemec and/or Casey become guys that need gigantic contracts that means they have become players you move other players for to accommodate so I'm really not seeing the risk here in keeping them. You're basically saying for the Devils to trade them before they reach peak value in their current contracts.

They signed Pesce to a long term deal and he's not a physical guy, nor is Hamilton so I don't really get the assertion that they wouldn't be able to fit those guys in the lineup because they aren't physical.
I'm saying that they won't have room or time for these guys to reach "peak" value, so should be looking to trade at least one of them before they lose value.

Holtz is a cautionary tale. How much of Holtz's story is that Holtz was a poor pick and how much is that Holtz didn't have the right opportunity to develop with the Devils? Obviously the Cotter deal has been good for the Devils, but it's not at all what people were expecting out of the #7OA pick.

I don't think Nemec is losing value. It's Casey's first year in the pros, so clearly he's not losing value either. But, that won't be the story forever.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,254
2,810
i should have written that i absolutely think Kovy should get a contract from us, actually the day the trade was announced, i thought Fitz should try to sign on the cheap, he still should and i think a bridge deal could make sense for both sides. He is better then just a 3rd pairing and exactly the type of player you need for the playoffs. We cant just go with Dillon being the only guy physical back there. Gives us more options when it comes to move Douggie or one of the prospects.

As some of you wrote, there is not many teams willing to trade a potential 2nd line center and i rather go for higher quality as this could turn us into a real contender. I dont see any other chance with the cap space available the next two years.

again a 9AO center in a deep draft with one more year ELC then Nemec, that would help the team more then waiting for Nemec seems like a fair deal and if we get an additional pick even better.
Detroit just sticks out and Danielson really seems the perfect fit for the Devils. They would also be potential trade partners when it comes to moving Douggie, but that contract could be more difficult to move given the 10team trade list.

There is pro and cons for both Casey and Nemec, when it comes to who of the two should be moved.
i would like to see Fitz being active this time and not wait until we get even more injuries.
Friedman mentioned Bosten could move Frederick and i saw Geekie was a healthy scratch last game, they both would be great to have too
NJD does not need a 2C. We have Nico and Jack, both of whom should be able to fill up our 1 and 2C spot for the next decade.

What we don't have is a 1RD long term. That is Simon Nemec.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SJinNewJersey

dzubrus8

Registered User
Jun 15, 2014
431
270
With respect to trading Nemec - who are the trading partners? Who is giving up a young C or RW on an ELC that makes dealing from a position of strength the play at this point? I totally understand the thought process but who other than Anaheim and San Jose have forwards like that to spare?

Also - probably want to see more than 15 games of Kovy before going all in on him as a keeper.
Off the top of my head I wonder if it’s interesting for Anaheim, Buffalo, Columbus, Detroit, Nashville, Ottawa (iirc they have a lot of LHD), San Jose could all be options
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,254
2,810
i should have written that i absolutely think Kovy should get a contract from us, actually the day the trade was announced, i thought Fitz should try to sign on the cheap, he still should and i think a bridge deal could make sense for both sides. He is better then just a 3rd pairing and exactly the type of player you need for the playoffs. We cant just go with Dillon being the only guy physical back there. Gives us more options when it comes to move Douggie or one of the prospects.

As some of you wrote, there is not many teams willing to trade a potential 2nd line center and i rather go for higher quality as this could turn us into a real contender. I dont see any other chance with the cap space available the next two years.

again a 9AO center in a deep draft with one more year ELC then Nemec, that would help the team more then waiting for Nemec seems like a fair deal and if we get an additional pick even better.
Detroit just sticks out and Danielson really seems the perfect fit for the Devils. They would also be potential trade partners when it comes to moving Douggie, but that contract could be more difficult to move given the 10team trade list.

There is pro and cons for both Casey and Nemec, when it comes to who of the two should be moved.
i would like to see Fitz being active this time and not wait until we get even more injuries.
Friedman mentioned Bosten could move Frederick and i saw Geekie was a healthy scratch last game, they both would be great to have too
If your assumption is Kovacevic is a top 4 RD all year, then frankly he's the guy you sell.

If you get to the deadline and Kovacevic is still playing like this, you sell HIM and bring Nemec into the lineup. Then if you want you can use that 1st to go trade for/draft a 3C prospect.

(Sean Walker got a 1st last year after being a cap giveaway)
 

woody footbreaker

Registered User
Mar 12, 2018
38
20
NJD does not need a 2C. We have Nico and Jack, both of whom should be able to fill up our 1 and 2C spot for the next decade.

What we don't have is a 1RD long term. That is Simon Nemec.
8 think they do. i am of strong believe the devils would be better with jack playing wing or at least playing him in a hybrid role as when haula was up there playing with him.
if we get another power forward for our top six which we should anyway, then you can play the new C on the 3rd line and turn the devils into a true contender for years to come. if one of nico/jack go down for a bit, it doesnt look good at all.

i dont think with our forward group we have what it takes this year, but i am really excited for next year. Fitz has definitely some options and its up to them evaluate what Nemec/Casey will become within a year or so. but they should really try to flip one of them into a quality C prospect
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,254
2,810
i am of strong believe the devils would be better with jack playing wing
Full honesty, I no longer value your opinion on anything related to hockey based on this sentence.

Also Jack didn't play a hybrid role with Haula. Jack was the center, Haula just took faceoffs.
 

woody footbreaker

Registered User
Mar 12, 2018
38
20
and for Kovy, i really think he has more value then most give him credit for. If you sign him to a reasonable brigde deal, his trade value would be even higher, should they decide to move him later
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,003
14,920
If your assumption is Kovacevic is a top 4 RD all year, then frankly he's the guy you sell.

If you get to the deadline and Kovacevic is still playing like this, you sell HIM and bring Nemec into the lineup. Then if you want you can use that 1st to go trade for/draft a 3C prospect.

(Sean Walker got a 1st last year after being a cap giveaway)

Sean Walker had a reasonably long career of being okay and also came with the cap dump of Ryan Johansen. He did not get a 1st outright.

At most, you could sell Kovacevic for a 2nd at the deadline, and that's if he keeps up this level and usage. He has never played in the playoffs before. He's been on waivers and was traded for a 4th round pick.
 

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,590
22,976
St Petersburg
Agreed that moving Dougie in 2 years is the ideal outcome to keep all around but I think it’s too much talent in the backend while there are glaring needs at forward that’s historically not easy to patch in FA or a pick for player trade unless you’re willing to take on a 30+ year old.*

Not trying to be rhetorical - who are some defensemen that are Casey’s size and are elite TWDs or really stout defensively? I’m not saying he’s too small to be a good player I’m just less interested in a Makar/Fox archetype if that’s what he’s forecasted to be stylistically (talent wise of course that would be awesome) given how this defense is looking in 2-3 years. Think you already have plenty offensive talent from L Hughes and Nemec and Dougie if he is still around. I think Casey could be a great player but given the need for what’s actually a 2C but I’ll call a middle-6 C that’s a move I’d think about making. I’d take either Bystedt or Danielson for Casey but probably neither for Nemec.

*Only recent trade/FA examples that come to mind are Trocheck, Hertl (injury prone, high retention contract that had the potential to be a disaster). You have some short term fixes like ROR or Duchene if you’re willing to go 30+ which I’m not opposed to but otherwise hard to get a prime aged player of that ilk.
Detroit have Wallinder, Pellikka, plus Seider and Edvinsson. They dont need to trade Denielson for Casey.
San Jose is more interesting case. But I dont know who will win this trade. Of course we dont need to win every trade, we need to build good team with good depth. But still i would prefer to save Casey.

Trading Nemec is crazy.
 
Last edited:

woody footbreaker

Registered User
Mar 12, 2018
38
20
Detroit have Wallinder, Pellikka, plus Seider and Edvinsson. They dont need to trade Denielson for Casey.
San Jose is more interesting case. But I dont know who will win this trade. Of course we dont need to win every trade, we need to build good team with good depth. But still i would prefer to save Casey.

Trading Nemec is crazy.
because of Sandin-Pellikka i never mentioned Casey when it comes to trading with the wings. look very similar, so you would have to look to trade with a different team.

is there a chance to sign a russian center during the season? other europeans usually have that exit clause in their contracts when a Nhl team wants to sign them. would definitely help to have a russian player already on the team to get Gritsyuk on the team for next season
 

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,590
22,976
St Petersburg
because of Sandin-Pellikka i never mentioned Casey when it comes to trading with the wings. look very similar, so you would have to look to trade with a different team.

is there a chance to sign a russian center during the season? other europeans usually have that exit clause in their contracts when a Nhl team wants to sign them. would definitely help to have a russian player already on the team to get Gritsyuk on the team for next season
I have names, Glotov for example. But I don't think Fitz will do it with anyone. He didn't try before when we actually had need.
In Danielson case - Nemec is better.
Dougie is here for one or two years. We don't need to limit our window. 3rd line center could be signed from the market. Or could be traded for less. We got Haula for meh version of Zacha(most regular one). Monahan was signed for 5+ mil for reasonable period. Nemec is future two way 20+ min player. I don't know about 38-45 points or more but he is showing enough to not worry about him.

In case of Casey - we need more from Bystedt to trade for him. Casey is way too dynamic to just trade him for 3rd line center.

Sometimes we need just chill and go with the flow. We are having mostly everything to compete and win now with Markstrom and the tail of Hischiers and Hamiltons deals. Nemec and Casey just were not more ready for now. May be Nemec is more ready than Dougie, may be Casey is more dynamic, but Dougie will not sit. Way too many millions to sit. I believe we will see them this season.

I like idea of finding third line center (or even center for face offs for Jack), but it shouldn't be Nemec, Silayev, Casey and Gritsyuk. I would think about Lenny(it will be harder for him to compete for top 6 spot), but it depends on who we are talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xirik and My3Sons

Goptor

Registered User
Jun 30, 2016
2,756
3,336
Casey won't be a long term Devil. He'll be traded for similar style player in Quinn Hughes. There is no point in having those 2 players on the same team anyways.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,254
2,810
Sean Walker had a reasonably long career of being okay and also came with the cap dump of Ryan Johansen. He did not get a 1st outright.

At most, you could sell Kovacevic for a 2nd at the deadline, and that's if he keeps up this level and usage. He has never played in the playoffs before. He's been on waivers and was traded for a 4th round pick.
And Sean Walker was traded in that offseason for literally nothing as cap clearing.

The rest of the potential RHD rentals have been atrocious this year.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad