I still harbor a bit of a grudge at the medical staff for utterly failing to diagnose Bickell, both for his well-being and for stupid selfish fan reasons that we wouldn't have had to give Teravainen away for nothing to get rid of that contract (we would've given him away for nothing to get rid of Seabs' contract).
Wasnt Mike Reilly going to be a top 4 dman for the Hawks if he signed in Chicago ... he spurned the Hawks and went to Minny
Minny flipped him to MON for a 5th
Wasnt Mike Reilly going to be a top 4 dman for the Hawks if he signed in Chicago ... he spurned the Hawks and went to Minny
Minny flipped him to MON for a 5th
Teravainen with another goal
18 goals + 33 assists for 51 pts in 65 games
Not even 24 yrs old and just scratching surface of his potential
this drives me crazy and my emotional side takes over. that is when i start ranting on the reasons why SB should be fired and i can justify that with the mention of TT success, S. Johns - D-man, the wasted 3 yrs of mismanagement decisions. agh .......Teravainen with another goal
18 goals + 33 assists for 51 pts in 65 games
Not even 24 yrs old and just scratching surface of his potential
the 3 and i will just deal with 3 things that SB did to screw the Bhawks ........ for a great run. Bickell contract, Seabs contract, Bickell trade.I have said this a million times, TT, Panarin and Danault were the breaking back moves of the offense, those guys should have been Part of the core, Stan is a complete moron, it’s mindblowing how some people still stick up for him with a long list of pathetic moves that have gotten this team playing like the worst team in the NHL right now, but hey let’s blame it all on Q!
the 3 and i will just deal with 3 things that SB did to screw the Bhawks ........ for a great run. Bickell contract, Seabs contract, Bickell trade.
those 3 moves i mention were the start of a list of screw up he did. even if those who will argue against my pov, can not argue the fact of those 3 moves that began the start of the downfall of this team. hell i rant on the positiveness of SB scouting and drafting, but none of them have a uninterrupted effect of a domino negative whirl-wind that resulted from those 3 moves.Let me clarify by saying not necessarily the “moves” but those players should not have left the Hawks for a long time. He has a long list of pathetic signings and moves that I can add but yes the signing of Seabrook is a huge one and even Toews and Kane would not have gotten what they have gotten with a smart GM, he just doesn’t know how to negotiate, just look at all the NMC, it’s like giving out candy... Here comes the delusional crowd that is gonna say Toews and Kane would have gotten 13 Million lol
Teuvo is going to score around sixty points this year. Soft perimeter player or not, guys that can do that don't just stick in the NHL, they get paid.
Pssst.... here's a secret.
He isn't and never was a 'soft perimeter player'. He's a player with elite vision, that could find and create space for himself with the stick of surgeon and raw hockey IQ.
He was just always really, really good. One of the best I've seen in a looooooooong time to carve up neutral zone coverage with passes, and then he could turn around and be great defensively too. He was and is a living cheat code in the modern NHL.
Pssst.... here's a secret.
He isn't and never was a 'soft perimeter player'. He's a player with elite vision, that could find and create space for himself with the stick of surgeon and raw hockey IQ.
He was just always really, really good. One of the best I've seen in a looooooooong time to carve up neutral zone coverage with passes, and then he could turn around and be great defensively too. He was and is a living cheat code in the modern NHL.
this drives me crazy and my emotional side takes over. that is when i start ranting on the reasons why SB should be fired and i can justify that with the mention of TT success, S. Johns - D-man, the wasted 3 yrs of mismanagement decisions. agh .......
Pssst.... here's a secret.
He isn't and never was a 'soft perimeter player'. He's a player with elite vision, that could find and create space for himself with the stick of surgeon and raw hockey IQ.
He was just always really, really good. One of the best I've seen in a looooooooong time to carve up neutral zone coverage with passes, and then he could turn around and be great defensively too. He was and is a living cheat code in the modern NHL.
i am not talking about bickell sickness, i am talking about the waste of cap space that went with his contract. the necessity to need to trade him and failed. i am also talking about eventually trading him and the players who went with that trade to sweeten the deal, i am talking about other moves that was needed to accommodate that trade. last S Johns with the same of sweetening the deal. looking back anyone can see and gauge whether a trade was a plus or minus effect for a team. i am talking at the time.Bickell's contract would have been fine if he didn't have MS, and if the Hawks had figured that out instead of Carolina, TT would have been here still. **** happens. Move on.
Johns is a bottom pairing D. Nothing special. Something the Hawks have an abundance of.
i am not talking about bickell sickness, i am talking about the waste of cap space that went with his contract. the necessity to need to trade him and failed. i am also talking about eventually trading him and the players who went with that trade to sweeten the deal, i am talking about other moves that was needed to accommodate that trade. last S Johns with the same of sweetening the deal. looking back anyone can see and gauge whether a trade was a plus or minus effect for a team. i am talking at the time.
you say move on and yet you and other posters don't move on and pick and choose which argument to fight.
ref Johns, as you said, right now, i am talking about several yrs ago when it mattered.What are you talking about?
Bickell's contract wouldn't have been a waste of cap space if he hadn't gotten sick... You can't separate him from his illness, as it was a direct cause for his contract being bad. His contract at 4m was overpaid by about 1m, depending on his production. Remember Bickell was coming off a dominant playoff performance when he got that contract, and that was what the Hawks expected him to do moving forward. TT would not have been required to sweeten any deal. His contract would have been plenty movable. It's nonsense.
And again, with Johns, who cares? He's a 3rd pairing D, and the Hawks probably have 8 of those between Rockford and Chicago right now.
And what do I and other posters not move on from, and pick and choose which argument to fight? I'm curious. Find something that I won't, or haven't moved on from.
perfect defense.... i will in the future of any discussion.What are you talking about?
Bickell's contract wouldn't have been a waste of cap space if he hadn't gotten sick... You can't separate him from his illness, as it was a direct cause for his contract being bad. His contract at 4m was overpaid by about 1m, depending on his production. Remember Bickell was coming off a dominant playoff performance when he got that contract, and that was what the Hawks expected him to do moving forward. TT would not have been required to sweeten any deal. His contract would have been plenty movable. It's nonsense.
And again, with Johns, who cares? He's a 3rd pairing D, and the Hawks probably have 8 of those between Rockford and Chicago right now.
And what do I and other posters not move on from, and pick and choose which argument to fight? I'm curious. Find something that I won't, or haven't moved on from.
perfect defense.... i will in the future of any discussion.
ref Johns, as you said, right now, i am talking about several yrs ago when it mattered.
bickell only performed during 1 playoff and was successful. during the previous season campaign he was nothing, after he got his contract he still performed like nothing. it was several yrs later he was diagnose in having MS. to get rid of his contract, the team gave away a decent prospect .....
his illness really affected bickell when ..... this is a main point of contention. also his salary was an over payment. i was *****ing about that over payment when it happen. just like M. Kruger, just like Seabs.