You guys want to have an interesting discussion?
How come all of the public models think Dylan Strome is a really good player and this board and NHL teams think that he sucks?
There's solid stats guys and bad ones. Dom L, the athletic guy is terrible and uses his stats to make judgements without watching.
But there's also pretty not far-off reasons why Strome has some better numbers if you breakdown his season. And Large effects of these stats or role based.
For instance I've seen people here call last years team one of the worst defensive teams... they weren't. After King took over they actually had quite a lot of defensive improvement, but 5on5 offense was a bigger failure the whole year than pure defense. That includes holding onto the puck.
But they were extra awful under JC... who didn't play like any of those 12 games. Strome. Also I would say when Strome did get in a groove earlier in the year he was trying well defensively, I recall a 3on3 he was trying to direct Kane to no success defensively and he had effort there... then that went away soon after though. His numbers are boosted by things that are trends and eye test see able. But national stats guys aren't following these factors