Player Discussion: The Elvis Thread

[majormajor]

I've stayed somewhat quiet on the Elvis debate, but your post has me coming out of the woodwork. Not in disagreement just that it triggered me about Elvis and the coaching difference. EDIT - this turned into a rant about the prior FO and HC than I intended! TL;DR, but I left it all here.

If Elvis was a problem for the room generally, as suggested by Porty and MM, then the two people not currently in the room and most likely to be irritated by Elvis last season would have been Jenner as C and/or HCPV. And maybe Z, who is still in the room. Hell, they were also irritated by other things (Laine, losing, JK, losing, PV, losing).

My take is that "IF" there was wide-spread discord within the room last season specifically regarding Elvis, then Jenner and Z took up the sword, but with encouragement from GMJK and HCPV to beat that drum. My "guess" is that Elvis probably spouted off about the lack of D structure, lack of D support, something about coaching and the D generally - and that didn't sit well with anyone. And I agree that should not have sat well. In last year's environment, hell yes Elvis was a handful. He can be a handful in the best of times. However, publicly "demoting" Elvis to 3rd goalie last January based on off-ice issues, not on-ice performance, was a bonehead move - it was seen as embarrassing and undeserved, and both were fairly accurate reads. When/if there is discord from a player about coaching/systems, you don't demote and send "messages" through the media, no matter how immature the player may be. You sit all the parties down and you work it out. If it doesn't work out and the damage is that extreme, you send to the AHL, or you trade him (I know, not tradeable) or buy him out (not last year based on numbers). That's not what PV and/or JK did - they (or one of them) instead wanted to "send the message" that they were in charge and publicly demoted him behind 2 goalies at a time when his play was fine. All goalies are head cases to some extent. What you do to get a 21-year old forward's attention for repeatedly not playing D (a healthy scratch with video reinforcement) is not what you necessarily do with a goalie (a 3-week demotion, not one game) when that G happens to be stopping pucks relatively well under the team's overall circumstances. Elvis had been playing OK, borderline OK+ leading up to the demotion announced by GMJK and HCPV. They gave similar yo-yo treatment to Jiricek - never a clear consistent professional message, but instead messaging through TOI and through the media. Immature leadership imo.

No doubt that Elvis needs more than a normal share of direct leadership and coddling than most players - but that is true for several stellar players in the NHL. Every team has some of that, the better teams/coaches know how to adapt and capitalize on that. Assuming that Elvis questioned coaching/systems, that was not going to be tolerated last year for a second, because PV could not afford any questioning because he himself knew he was flailing; he had no buy-in from the room generally and was losing the room. JK suspected he himself was a short-timer. Mature (confident) coaches/GMs know that while the overal treatment of the TEAM needs to be consistent, the amount of time/effort needed with, and the tailoring of messages to, individual players will vary from player to player, and even from month-to-month. Even Torts got that part right- especially with goalies.

My opinion is that GMJK was never able to see that players were individuals with regard to any player - to him players had x talent/potential from a scouting perspective and otherwise you plugged those talents/potential into a team of interchangeable parts. From his perspective, every player needed to have Boone Jenner's attitude/approach. That is simply not the real world. My opinion is that HCPV was a rookie coach in way over his head and that became obvious very early in the season - PV's actions all year were more about defending his own hiring from the first minute on the job than they were true leadership. He had started to lose the entire team so felt he had to look strong in dealing with Elvis. That last statement is much more on GMJK in hiring PV than it is on PV himself. PV simply wasn't ready and the Babcock fiasco thrust it on him. Maybe PV will be a great HC someday; I know there will be some disagreement, but PV was horrendous last year, regardless of the circumstances. And if the choice of PV somehow is seen as excused by the timing of the Babcock fiasco, I disagree with that excuse - that was on GMJK making the wrong choice of Babcock in the first place. It was past time for GMJK to go elsewhere, and some of the Elvis issues got caught up in the FO/Coaching fiasco.

Counter that with a guaranteed "fresh start" from GMDW and from HCDE as to EVERY player - they didn't even want to discuss or view last year's performances. I would venture to say that the room was encouraged to do, and from what we see, has done, the same thing. I like Porty's writing, but Porty seems stuck on last year's targeting of Elvis and wanting to circle back to that whenever an Elvis sighting occurs. Not saying Elvis doesn't still have issues, what goalie doesn't. Elvis certainly could use more endearing terms than cursing, calling attention to himself, etc... But the only action out-of-line since the fresh start appears to be the overly-dramatic and admittedly selfish reaction to losing the shutout in the last seconds. Usually it would be the player who took the penalty and the PK'ers who would be pissed and apologizing to Elvis, but Elvis didn't give them a chance. I agree Elvis was out of line, and yet I also understand Elvis' reaction - I'd want the shutout too, especially after last season's escapades/blaming and also coming back from whatever injury ailed him. HCDE nipped Elvis' lack of focus solely on TEAM result IMMEDIATELY (and to a certain extent publicly to reinforce the message to the ENTIRE ROOM, in response to Elvis' very public display on the ice). The feedback was based on Elvis' specific conduct that evening. The feedback was clear, it was not degrading, it was given IMMEDIATELY that night and reinforced the very next morning. Not a benching - a coaching. That is what good feedback to a player looks like. And Elvis got the net the very next game and capitalized on it. I'd say that's good player response to good feedback. He still can learn more. How that plays out from here, who knows.

Sorry for the rant. Not an Elvis apologist, he has been less than stellar for stretches. Not sure he is an answer to the G position but for this season, yes he is part of the answer. No doubt he has brought a lot of criticism upon himself at times. But he's gotten ZERO help from the last 3 seasons of coaching (Larsen's laissez-faire and PV's reactionary coaching) - and skaters got that same ZERO help from coaching.
HCDE may not be a HofF coach. He may or may not be the coach to get you a Stanley Cup. But he is clearly head and shoulders above the last 3 years coaching at implementing a system in the first 9 games of a season and in dealing with professional hockey players and their egos. Hopefully, he's just as adept at holding players accountable in a professional way, and keeping the room for an entire 82-game season. Baby steps, but really good baby steps.

Rant over.

Agree that CBJ did not simply trade away the source of issues with Elvis.
However, I disagree with the Porty's suggestion that the players are "trying to bring Elvis back in" and with your suggestion that "we have little reason to doubt the accuracy of that reporting."

GMDW was actively looking for a trade partner because it appeared Elvis needed (had requested) a change of scenery.
But GMDW also was more than willing to grant a "fresh start" not only to Elvis but to the entire roster.
A change of scenery could very well be a change in GM/HC.
If Elvis' issues were perceived as a cancer in the room, regardless of the "fresh start" concept, GMDW would have eaten the contract and not risked him in the room. He did not do that. Elvis can be a huge PIA, but not a cancer.
Same fresh start from HCDE.

If if every player got a fresh start from GM and HC, then the players themselves also give each other a fresh start. They damn well better anyway.
I am huge fan of Boone Jenner, but if he can't see that many of the problems from the past 3 seasons (Elvis and otherwise) arose from poor FO/Coaching and from continuous losing, that's on Boone Jenner. Not suggesting Elvis had/has no faults, he had more than his fair share. Still does. But at this point, being a C is not being a company man supporting JK or PV or any GM or floundering HC. It is leading your teammates. Elvis was difficult to lead, but in large part due to HCPV and GMJK, as much as due to Elvis himself.

I buy the accuracy of Porty's reporting regarding last season. I do not buy the insinuation that the roster is "trying to bring Elvis back" this season. He's on the team and playing/practicing hard. They don't "bring Elvis back" he's already there. He has ego and communication issues - as have many top-notch goalies, especially early in their careers. Elvis has not played top-notch hockey consistently, so the combination of less-than-stellar play combined with an immature ego led to issues when the room was falling apart last year anyway.

The players/leadership group lead Elvis, just like they need to lead every other player on this roster. He's not on the outside looking in.

In my experience the bolded part of your post (I bolded it) is just plain wrong. Every coach, every manager in business, every leader of every group affects in many ways the relationships among players, staff, etc. Not the only influence but one of several major influences. When a boss puts one staff member "in the dog house" the response from the rest of the group is either a) to rally in support of staff member if the discipline is seen as unfair; or b) side with the boss and put the disciplined person into the group's doghouse as well, so as to not jeopardize one's own status.

The constant drumbeat of how "bad" Elvis is for this team, outside of his play, is just wrong. From everything that Porty has written, there was no despicable actions by Elvis - it appears to have been linked to criticism of teammates and/or coaching. Those were incredibly stupid, immature and wrong actions/statements by Elvis.

But if everyone gets a fresh start, so should Elvis, not just with coaches/GMs but also with the team. And yet the first little issue with Elvis regarding a temper outburst at losing a shutout results in Porty referring back to last year and Elvis still being "worked back into the mix." Was it a good look given the past? No. Was it egregious - no, go watch a lot of goalies smash a stick under those same circumstances or one of our players splinter a stick after missing an open net.

Since the change in GM/HC (i.e. the fresh start), I see a) continued good relationships among Elvis and many members of this team; b) nothing negative about his relationship with other players or the coach/GM; c) an improved level of play (although still not good enough except for past 2 games); d) a two-week injury stint that we will likely never know the root cause (exhaustion, leftover effects from Kivi's passing resurfacing as a result of JG's death, a physical injury, or something else?); and d) the TEAM is rolling, with Elvis a part of it and winning games with his teammates.

The past two games are just two games --- not enough to change anyone's mind (including mine) whether he is good enough/consistent enough to backstop a good team. But Elvis gets the same fresh start as every other player? Or is there a different standard for him?

If you said that Elvis is simply not good enough to be goalie for this team, I would not even have commented. I would tend to agree.
But intimating that something is still amiss in the room with regard to Elvis, that he's "bad for the team"- I see that as unfair and you beat that drum every chance you get. It's tiring and you caught me on a bad day.

There are always going to be hiccups on a team - there were hiccups with beloved Dubinsky, Bob, etc. behind the scenes.
Hell, Torts didn't think Foligno was a capable leader at first, didn't like him as a player. There were shouting matches beyond belief.
The difference is that the coaching staffs the past 3 years couldn't have handled those "disturbances, just like they didn't handle Elvis.
Elvis is a "loud" personality, and as G is much more visible - skaters can go to the bench and vent their rage/frustration/whatever without the spotlight on them. Elvis kind of likes the spotlight and its on him after every save and every GA. So I get he's a lightning rod. But he's not the cancer you make him out to be, and Porty has zero evidence of anything this year, just links every whiff of an issue with Elvis now to prior tribulations.

I'm rooting for Elvis more than any player. If he really turns it around I'm going to be so happy for him. I had a few tears when he got his shutout the other day.

I suspect this is why there is this sudden interest in revising the history around Elvis in Columbus. People are rooting for him and then turning that into saying he wasn't that much of an issue or it was other people's fault.

That overlaps with the other bias I think at work here, which is that anytime there is a changing of the guard in management, we try hard to lump every conceivable problem into a bundle we can blame on the old guard.

I'm sorry to attribute your posts here to those biases but I really have no other reason to explain how we're coming up with these new theories all of a sudden. Especially saying that the leaders in the room only pushed back on Elvis because they were instigated by management, that to me is the exact sort of thing people would say if there was a change in management.

It's far easier for me to imagine that the reporters who cover this stuff know better, and that given the fact that Elvis could not be moved, and given that the team has come together after the loss of Johnny (which also helps them appreciate what Elvis went through losing Matiss), and given that the team is playing well and Elvis playing well under Evason, it's just the right team to turn a new leaf. We had genuine issues, not fake, not made up or forced by management. Real problems that leaders would normally take issue with. And we are in the process of moving past it. Is that unrealistic? I think that is more realistic than what you're suggesting.

A few other random notes:

- GMJK is also the guy that let go of our old leadership core that we had under Torts and replaced them with largely mercurial players like Laine, Domi, Voracek, etc... If he was trying to build a team of Boone Jenner's then he got very confused in the process. The simpler answer is that sometimes trying to set high organizational standards runs into conflict with the way people are. Standards are good, and people can still be good even if they fail to meet those standards at some point or another. Those aren't hard things to believe.

- I did not have the idea that questioning coaches or systems is why Elvis got into trouble. I don't know where you picked that up from.

- Evason having quick and specific feedback for Elvis about the stick slamming thing - a very minor infraction - isn't different than what PV or Larsen or Torts would have done at times. That's a routine thing they would have done. The benchings that we heard about were for more serious stuff. Again this is typical when there is a new coach, we give them credit and give the old coach discredit, when it's all for the same thing. Evason has enough to hang his hat on. I would sooner ask, how is he so damn uplifting? That has a bigger effect on things.

- What is Boone Jenner to blame for? I'm confused where this idea is coming from.

- I haven't listened to Porty this week, just about to listen to Front and Nationwide, but from what I've heard so far he hasn't been very negative about Elvis this year, mostly positive mentions and one small aside about a possible Jarry trade. And I bet he's written less on the little stick slamming thing than people here did. Yeah it's a little thing that reminds us of some of Elvis' struggles in preceding seasons. It's not a huge deal and it's not a huge deal if someone writes a post about it. Unless Porty writes about it, then people go ballistic. I'm getting the idea that people think they need to protect Elvis from Porty. It's unnecessary.

 

[koteka]

This was several paragraphs into your rant, but I feel this is an important observation about the team last season.

My opinion is that GMJK was never able to see that players were individuals with regard to any player - to him players had x talent/potential from a scouting perspective and otherwise you plugged those talents/potential into a team of interchangeable parts. From his perspective, every player needed to have Boone Jenner's attitude/approach. That is simply not the real world. My opinion is that HCPV was a rookie coach in way over his head and that became obvious very early in the season - PV's actions all year were more about defending his own hiring from the first minute on the job than they were true leadership. He had started to lose the entire team so felt he had to look strong in dealing with Elvis. That last statement is much more on GMJK in hiring PV than it is on PV himself. PV simply wasn't ready and the Babcock fiasco thrust it on him. Maybe PV will be a great HC someday; I know there will be some disagreement, but PV was horrendous last year, regardless of the circumstances. And if the choice of PV somehow is seen as excused by the timing of the Babcock fiasco, I disagree with that excuse - that was on GMJK making the wrong choice of Babcock in the first place. It was past time for GMJK to go elsewhere, and some of the Elvis issues got caught up in the FO/Coaching fiasco.

 

[NotWendell]

I have nothing new to add on Elvis.

My biggest issue with Jarmo was he only seemed to evaluate a player based on the back of his hockey card or how splashy the trade/acquisition would be for him.

There was no construction of a TEAM, no thought to intangibles, no evident consideration of the player's mindset - especially in a contract year. That's with the sole exception of Bobrovsky after a playoff loss. Bottom line, no thought given to will all the pieces fit together - or if they have the WILL to fit together.

Ending on a positive thought, Don Waddell has already done more of this in the short time he's been here. So I'm optimistic about the future.

 

[majormajor]

Are the last two posts saying the same thing or saying different things?

Anyways I think Lee Smith was closer to the mark, if overstated.

 

[Fred Glover]

I have nothing new to add on Elvis.

My biggest issue with Jarmo was he only seemed to evaluate a player based on the back of his hockey card or how splashy the trade/acquisition would be for him.

There was no construction of a TEAM, no thought to intangibles, no evident consideration of the player's mindset - especially in a contract year. That's with the sole exception of Bobrovsky after a playoff loss. Bottom line, no thought given to will all the pieces fit together - or if they have the WILL to fit together.

Ending on a positive thought, Don Waddell has already done more of this in the short time he's been here. So I'm optimistic about the future.

Jarmo must have flunked chemistry in school

 

[Forepar]

I didn't want to comment any further on Elvis but I have to at least state my opinion that, no, I don't think it's remotely feasible that we simply traded away any dispute with Elvis. This was a broader thing in the room. And that they've decided to give another shot to working with Elvis because they were unable to find a trade partner. The players are trying to bring Elvis back in, to use Porty's phrase, and we have little reason to doubt the accuracy of that reporting.

I was overboard Friday. Full disclosure, I'm not as big an Elvis fan as you (who knew?), not because of personality but because of play/results. I should have responded directly to your post instead of to the vibes ringing in my ears partly from your post but primarily from continued negative posts by others about Elvis. I apologize.

For me, this team is just way different than the past 3 years, not just in terms of structure/result, but in energy/vibe. This past weekend being an outlier this season, but Johnny's death seems to have had a lot to do with binding this group together, including Elvis, as volatile as he can be. I hope Elvis finds a consistent stride. The timing of your statement "players trying to bring Elvis back in, to use Porty's phrase, as we have little reason to doubt the accuracy of that reporting" seemed very odd to me last week. From my perspective, Elvis has been back "in" with the group so far this season (as you mentioned, nothing from Porty about Elvis recently), and had just finished two awesome games. Your statement may have been factually accurate but I did not understand your point or its timing - it seemed unnecessary given where the team was at after last Monday's and Wednesday's games. Two games (or a 3rd mediocre game in which the Jets schooled CBJ) do not mean that Elvis is all the sudden the long-term answer in net. But it seems to me that Elvis is a central part of THIS team. You weren't necessarily questioning Elvis' place on this team, but I read the "trying to bring Elvis back" in conjunction with posts from others that routinely make Elvis out to be a bad cancer for the team, as a statement that he has not yet earned his place on this team. I have no issue with opinions about player A or B or C's on-ice performance, but I am hyper-sensitive to criticism (perceived or not) of any player's commitment to each other and to the standard since August 2024. That wasn't your intent, my bad read..

I'm not blaming Boone Jenner -at least certainly didn't intent to. The point I tried but did not make very well is simply that no team is going to have a room of 21 Boone Jenners. And to me, that isn't just ok, that should be celebrated. I'm not sure Boone knew how to adapt to all that circled this team last season. Boone is a straight line player, straight line guy, and was experiencing more chaos (Babcock, PV, Elvis, Laine, etc.) and losing more games than he ever thought possible. It got too much, understandably, imo, to handle, as there was no structure or buy-in last year and that frustrated the bejesus out of Boone (and a few others).

I do think the events of the past 8-14 months (the Babckock fallout, injuries, Laine's mental health issues, Boone's unfathomable loss of a full-term babe, the loss of Johnny) all have broadened Boone's leadership skills. I especially liked one of your later posts - that the team as whole, and especially those close to Johnny, may now have a different appreciation for what Elvis went through (and will continue to work at) following Kivi's death. Amen. And never again for this franchise, please. Boone has been and when he gets back will be a stronger leader/force in dealing with Elvis.

Accepting the premise that there were major player issues with Elvis, I still think PV/JK made the situation substantially worse and threw gasoline on a small campfire. We can simply agree to disagree about the "bias" aspect - PV was a panic hire and then never rose to the occasion in several aspects. JK was a dumpster fire himself for 48 months. That doesn't put all of Elvis' tribulations on PV/JK, but PV and JK never helped that situation.

I feel horribly that Boone is not on the ice for this beginning stages of the turnaround. It is cool to watch, in spite of a few hiccup games. Boone deserves to be in the middle of that. Boone may still be in the room on practice days, meeting with teammates, lunches, etc...but it just is not the same for him. He could offer expanded leadership and lead the charge with his style of play to this group and the new structure.
I hope he's back for the 3/1/25 outdoor games. That one game may not be a huge issue, but that experience will be a defining moment with 100,000+ crazies in a stadium where Boone regularly attends OSU games. I partly feel that way because I'm not sure Boone has enough years left to get to a SCF run with this team - but wouldn't that be grand. But getting that crazy experience, and the fact that he won't recognize some of his linemates come March 1 (they are blooming in front of us, even a couple of grizzled vets that have elevated their games significantly (Z, Monahan, Provorov, Olivier).

So going to end on that positive note. Again, apologies for being overboard.

 

[Double-Shift Lasse]

 

[majormajor]

I was overboard Friday. Full disclosure, I'm not as big an Elvis fan as you (who knew?), not because of personality but because of play/results. I should have responded directly to your post instead of to the vibes ringing in my ears partly from your post but primarily from continued negative posts by others about Elvis. I apologize.

For me, this team is just way different than the past 3 years, not just in terms of structure/result, but in energy/vibe. This past weekend being an outlier this season, but Johnny's death seems to have had a lot to do with binding this group together, including Elvis, as volatile as he can be. I hope Elvis finds a consistent stride. The timing of your statement "players trying to bring Elvis back in, to use Porty's phrase, as we have little reason to doubt the accuracy of that reporting" seemed very odd to me last week. From my perspective, Elvis has been back "in" with the group so far this season (as you mentioned, nothing from Porty about Elvis recently), and had just finished two awesome games. Your statement may have been factually accurate but I did not understand your point or its timing - it seemed unnecessary given where the team was at after last Monday's and Wednesday's games. Two games (or a 3rd mediocre game in which the Jets schooled CBJ) do not mean that Elvis is all the sudden the long-term answer in net. But it seems to me that Elvis is a central part of THIS team. You weren't necessarily questioning Elvis' place on this team, but I read the "trying to bring Elvis back" in conjunction with posts from others that routinely make Elvis out to be a bad cancer for the team, as a statement that he has not yet earned his place on this team. I have no issue with opinions about player A or B or C's on-ice performance, but I am hyper-sensitive to criticism (perceived or not) of any player's commitment to each other and to the standard since August 2024. That wasn't your intent, my bad read..

I appreciate it but you were fine.

"Trying to bring Elvis back in" is to me a positive thing to say about Elvis. It's nice and I support it and I'm rooting hard for him. So I'm surprised that folks (not just you) are getting upset with me and angry with Porty for reporting it.

 

[koteka]

10 games into the season and Elvis is 4-5-1 with a 2.72 GAA and 1 shut out.

I was half watching the game last night in one of those sports bar / family restaurant type places. Elvis looked pretty good to me and seemed to be well positioned a couple of times when I was able to watch an extended period of play. Swayman didn’t look good. The JVR goal looked like the kind of goal that always goes against us.

Anywho, he is still too inconsistent, but Elvis isn’t the biggest problem on the team at the moment.

 

[NotWendell]

The Elvis we saw last night is worth every penny. He has the skill. He needs the consistency.

 

[Cheddarcheese]

The Elvis we saw last night is worth every penny. He has the skill. He needs the consistency.

like any goalie Elvis, just needed a team with structure, Brad larsen and Pascal were awful not to mention the team in front of him those years lol

 

[CBJWerenski8]

like any goalie Elvis, just needed a team with structure, Brad larsen and Pascal were awful not to mention the team in front of him those years lol

While true, this team has more structure to it and he’s still struggling. As is Tarasov.

That Boston game was amazing from Elvis. He had 3-4 ten bell saves where he saved someone’s ass (looking at severson). But on a typical Elvis game, those same 3-4 shots go in. Which is fine, but can he continue to stop the ones he SHOULD like he did that night? That’s the question.

 

[Cheddarcheese]

While true, this team has more structure to it and he’s still struggling. As is Tarasov.

That Boston game was amazing from Elvis. He had 3-4 ten bell saves where he saved someone’s ass (looking at severson). But on a typical Elvis game, those same 3-4 shots go in. Which is fine, but can he continue to stop the ones he SHOULD like he did that night? That’s the question.

i agree this year feels different, i hope he continues to prove everyone wrong

 

[DankoCBJ]

I´m so done watching this guy between the pipes.. SO DONE!

This has to be the final season. Buy-out or whatever the solution may be, but no more Elvis.

 

[CBJWerenski8]

man he had one bad game. The whole team played like ass too. He was playing fine before this. I think we need to cool the jets a little bit

 

[DankoCBJ]

man he had one bad game. The whole team played like ass too. He was playing fine before this. I think we need to cool the jets a little bit

It is not about one game. I wanted him out last summer and quite frankly the summer before that.

There have been countless bad games by Elvis.

He is an overpaid below average goalie with ego issues. And he isnt changing.

 

[CBJWerenski8]

It is not about one game. I wanted him out last summer and quite frankly the summer before that.

There have been countless bad games by Elvis.

He is an overpaid below average goalie with ego issues. And he isnt changing.

That’s fine, I also wanted him out and I will probably want us to move on from him whenever we can. But he’s been relatively fine this year. Some good games, some bad games.

 

[DarkandStormy]

That’s fine, I also wanted him out and I will probably want us to move on from him whenever we can. But he’s been relatively fine this year. Some good games, some bad games.

He's been bad this year. By most metrics (save %, GSAx, etc.) he's around the 50th-best goalie in the league. He's only getting starts because Tarasov is even worse.

He's been a sub-.900 goalie for the last three years. By virtually every metric he is a sub-replacement level goalie and in many ways is performing worse than last year.

 

[CBJWerenski8]

He's been bad this year. By most metrics (save %, GSAx, etc.) he's around the 50th-best goalie in the league. He's only getting starts because Tarasov is even worse.

He's been a sub-.900 goalie for the last three years. By virtually every metric he is a sub-replacement level goalie and in many ways is performing worse than last year.

I was at the game last night and his save % was over .900 before it started. While again, not exactly an endearing measure that he was barely there, it shows improvement. I think he’s been alright this year. Certainly not worth his price tag but it’s what we have.

I mostly just have an issue with this discussion after the worst game of the season for him. We weren’t talking about this a week ago.

 

[S1N4TR4]

I was at the game last night and his save % was over .900 before it started. While again, not exactly an endearing measure that he was barely there, it shows improvement. I think he’s been alright this year. Certainly not worth his price tag but it’s what we have.

I mostly just have an issue with this discussion after the worst game of the season for him. We weren’t talking about this a week ago.

uh.. not sure where you’re getting your numbers from. I vividly remember listening to the game on the radio and right before puck drop Bob McG said his save percentage was in the .890 area so I looked it up just now to confirm.. and yeah. definitely wasn’t > .900 save percentage before the game and certainly isn’t close to that now.

this is a screenshot of elvis’ numbers before the game last night.

in fact, elvis hasn’t had an accumulative save percentage over .900 on the season since 11-18-24 (after the away game in boston)

unless you’re talking about his career save percentage? which wouldn’t really be valid to this current discussion since he hasn’t finished a season with a .903 or greater save percentage in nearly 3 years. tells you how much his play has diminished since the first 50 or so games of his career.

 

[CBJWerenski8]

View attachment 943545


uh.. not sure where you’re getting your numbers from. I vividly remember listening to the game on the radio and right before puck drop Bob McG said his save percentage was in the .890 area so I looked it up just now to confirm.. and yeah. definitely wasn’t > .900 save percentage before the game and certainly isn’t close to that now.

this is a screenshot of elvis’ numbers before the game last night.

in fact, elvis hasn’t had an accumulative save percentage over .900 on the season since 11-18-24 (after the away game in boston)

unless you’re talking about his career save percentage? which wouldn’t really be valid to this current discussion since he hasn’t finished a season with a .903 or greater save percentage in nearly 3 years. tells you how much his play has diminished since the first 50 or so games of his career.

At the game last night they showed his save % at .900 while doing their side by side goalie stats during warmups. If that’s not correct, then that’s my bad for repeating it, but that’s what CBJ game ops had. I even pointed it out to who I was with at the game that I was surprised he got his numbers to .900.

Maybe I wasn’t looking clearly and it was his career % against the flyers. But I thought it said season stats.

Regardless, my opinion remains unchanged that he’s not the reason we lost last night and we wouldn’t be having this conversation if we lost 3-2 and he had been playing like he was in the previous games. That’s not to say he’s been good this year, I characterized him as “fine for the most part.” I still think we need a new goalie next year if possible.

 

[Monstershockey]

At the game last night they showed his save % at .900 while doing their side by side goalie stats during warmups. If that’s not correct, then that’s my bad for repeating it, but that’s what CBJ game ops had. I even pointed it out to who I was with at the game that I was surprised he got his numbers to .900.

Maybe I wasn’t looking clearly and it was his career % against the flyers. But I thought it said season stats.

Regardless, my opinion remains unchanged that he’s not the reason we lost last night and we wouldn’t be having this conversation if we lost 3-2 and he had been playing like he was in the previous games. That’s not to say he’s been good this year, I characterized him as “fine for the most part.” I still think we need a new goalie next year if possible.

It could have been his career save percentage against the Flyers, which was over .900 before last night.