Speculation: The Bruins and Jeremy Swayman are far apart in contract term (length) and dollar amount.

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,692
10,676
Sure....

Let's use that $8m x 8 year "example"... and also assume that Swayman believes he can be a top 3 goalie in the league for a long time.

In year 1, he's the 5th highest paid goalie in the league.

In year 2, he's the 6th highest paid goalie in the league (Shesterkin will 100% bump him down). Oettinger might be in the conversation as well.

In year 3, Bobrovsky will expire, potentailly making him the 5th highest paid goalie in the league. However, what's the cap going to be at that time? $100m?

In years 4-8, obviously difficult to predict who's going to be up as a goalie, but I think if you're Lewis Gross, you've got a valid point in arguing that if Swayman is a top 3-5 goalie, he should be paid higher than the 5th or 6th or 7th highest salary in the prime of his career.

You dont have to assume that Swayman believes he can be a top 3 goalie. But thats a lot different than him actually being a top 3 goalie. Assuming Boston believes he can be anywhere between a top 3 goalie or a top 12 goalie, why should they pay for the best case scenario?
 
  • Like
Reactions: wintersej

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
17,272
19,686
Vegass
You dont have to assume that Swayman believes he can be a top 3 goalie. But thats a lot different than him actually being a top 3 goalie. Assuming Boston believes he can be anywhere between a top 3 goalie or a top 12 goalie, why should they pay for the best case scenario?
Agreed. Right now, with what Sway is asking, if the bruins get anything less than the best case scenario then they overpaid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wintersej

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,008
18,648
North Andover, MA
Sure....

Let's use that $8m x 8 year "example"... and also assume that Swayman believes he can be a top 3 goalie in the league for a long time.

In year 1, he's the 5th highest paid goalie in the league.

In year 2, he's the 6th highest paid goalie in the league (Shesterkin will 100% bump him down). Oettinger might be in the conversation as well.

In year 3, Bobrovsky will expire, potentailly making him the 5th highest paid goalie in the league. However, what's the cap going to be at that time? $100m?

In years 4-8, obviously difficult to predict who's going to be up as a goalie, but I think if you're Lewis Gross, you've got a valid point in arguing that if Swayman is a top 3-5 goalie, he should be paid higher than the 5th or 6th or 7th highest salary in the prime of his career.

And honestly this is all why I’m surprised that they are talking 8 instead of 4 years.
 

Score08

Registered User
Apr 6, 2017
4,673
4,817
yeah you make a good point, clearly he's brother from stuff from the past so he prob would have made that clear


arbitration can get nasty. depending what was said, may never go back to 100% but I dont believe Sway will be trash within 3 years.
He’ll be bagging groceries in 3 yrs
 
  • Like
Reactions: FMichael

FMichael

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
5,741
5,915
Wisconsin
Yeah but thats not to his own fault. If he had a choice, I'm sure he would have liked to prove that the last season but Bruins elected to once again go with the tandem. Now its his first real chance to prove it and Bruins put themselves in an awful position. Bruins want their cake and to eat it too. They dont want to pay him full on starter money (seems like they do now though) but now obviously expect him to be their full time starter going forward.

Swayman is clearly very jaded to how the management has handled him and his contract situations these past 2 years.
$7.8 aav for 8 seasons would put Swayman as the 5th highest active goalie in the NHL…Is that not starter money???

It’s gotten to the point where most fans have soured on Swayman.
 

FMichael

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
5,741
5,915
Wisconsin
Dude sounds fragile

It was his damn choice to go to arbitration. and he didn't like the arguments they made in arbitration. WTF???? That is arbitration.

Ray Ferraro was talking about this. You have to be very level headed if you go arbitration and shrug things off, as that is the nature of what it is. It's a debate to a neutral party. If you dont want to hear somebody roasting you or can't handle it, then dont go arbitration.
This is the comedy of Gen Z aka Participation Trophy generation…Demand more than what you’re worth and being offended when told no.
 

FMichael

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
5,741
5,915
Wisconsin
"i dont feel love so overpay me" is not something I empathize with. Very toxic when you have so many teammates that count on your performance and also gets underpaid if you are overpaid.
Ullmark had to get moved in order to free up cap space for Swayman’s new contract…Had Swayman not filed for arbitration last summer and instead opted for a bridge deal - Ullmark could have finished playing his contract with the Bruins.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad