Rumor: The battle for Tarasenko is heating up

Status
Not open for further replies.

hockeyisles

Registered User
Jul 29, 2021
195
70
If I was saying he was healthy and the blues will get a solid return, that would be self serving. That’s not the case here. I expect us to get a crap return.
Ok if I missed that then you are not self-serving. That changes the entire equation.
 

Moose and Squirrel

Registered User
Jan 15, 2021
3,685
2,703
Yeah, I wouldn't be against that. Either that (so in worst case we will get at least a 1st + 3rd) or just the 1st plus prospect(s).
it seems the most 'fair' .. to me anyways.. if the floor falls out, not much was lost for the risk taken.. if he performs to his level, then raising it is fair for both teams
 

Moose and Squirrel

Registered User
Jan 15, 2021
3,685
2,703
U literally drive your shoulder down through the stick to to flex/snap the puck lmaooo what's he talking about?


This tarasenko saga just needs end lol
yeah, slapping a puck is much more strenuous on the shoulder than wristing, but I think the point trying to be made is generating power, which is a fair statement.
THAT being said, he didn't have ANY issues generating power on his wrister at the end of last year. his aim was just a tad off.. till that last PO game anyways... he picked a coupla corners in that one.
 

benedictTavares

JT's PJ's'
Jan 15, 2013
3,213
2,763
Scottsdale
No one wants to pay full price and I can not blame them. Just do whatever cap magic you need to do for him to play and trade him at the deadline. I doubt he holds out or plays games just call his bluff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoBooze

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
35,193
35,934
NJ
No one wants to pay full price and I can not blame them. Just do whatever cap magic you need to do for him to play and trade him at the deadline. I doubt he holds out or plays games just call his bluff.

If he does hold out though do you really want a guy who's played 42 total regular season and playoff games in 2.75 seasons to just get dropped onto your team? That's a ton of rust
 

hockeyisles

Registered User
Jul 29, 2021
195
70
We need to be realistic. Wahlstrom is never going to happen unless we add value to the trade. And then still, it's not going to happen.
However, I do think a 1st (it's going to be a late first anyway) + another pick/prospect(s) isn't out of the question as long as we can help the Islanders with their capproblem.

We can't retain on Tarasenko's contract because we need the capspace next year for Parayko's contract, however we can take on some capspace for this season as long as that increases the return we get for him: if we trade Tarasenko for his full contract we have enough capspace to take on both Hickey and Komarov's contracts. The Islanders will upgrade their top 6, get rid of 2 bad contracts and still have enough capspace for signing their RFA's (and possibly do a deal for a LHD) we on the other hand will have more than enough capspace to sign Robert Thomas and carry a 23-man roster. Hickey can be buried in the minors and Komarov can rotate in and out on our 4th line. Hickey and Komarov's contracts expire at the end of next season so capspace isn't going to be a problem when we need to sign Colt. Hell, we can retain 50% on both Hickey and Komarov if anyone wants them (which also isn't going to happen).

So in short:

Islanders:
- Tarasenko

Blues:
- Hickey
- Komarov
- 22 1st roundpick
- good but not top tier prospect(s) (not Dobson / Wahlstrom level, looking more at guys like Samuel Bolduc or Tristan Lennox) / extra pick(s)
Love the fact that you really worked to consider the need of both teams. excellent work.

however this still doesn’t work for the following reasons:

GM’s as a rule are risk averse. The risk of a Tarasenko reinjury is just too great.

with Anders Lee looking on track, Wahlstrom living up to expectations and looking like a young version of, dare I say it, Tarasenko. And Palmieri coming back to fill Eberle’s role, we simply don’t need to take on the risk of a Tarasenko reinjury.

‘we have a bunch of core players we need to resign, Tarasenko NEVER made sense for the Islanders and still doesn’t. I get that Armstrong desires some of our assets but we like them too. Lamouriello may have done his due diligence, as I’m sure every GM does. It’s prudent to do so. But there’s no compelling need for Tarasenko or the risk he represents.
 

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,132
Calgary Alberta
I think Seattle not taking Tarasenko for free kind of set the market for him. I would think that while Armstrong is willing to move Tarasenko for free he is not willing to add assets to move him. Or it could be worse and the assets being demanded are not something Armstrong is even willing to entertain.
But it wasn’t free really , it was less value to them than Dunn. Wooops , already been mentioned after your post . Anyways , I hope the Devils still look into this and offer a slight pick/ prospect that improves based on certain conditions
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hisch13r

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,730
5,785
Visit site
Dunn wasn't a 7.5 million question mark. Tanks is and that's why he wasn't picked nor traded.

I feel for the Blues fans but right now, the ONLY option is to play him. No one is giving you a used puck until Tank is on the ice and showing that he's healthy and able. Sorry.
 

Celtic Note

Living the dream
Dec 22, 2006
17,333
6,305
I think Seattle not taking Tarasenko for free kind of set the market for him. I would think that while Armstrong is willing to move Tarasenko for free he is not willing to add assets to move him. Or it could be worse and the assets being demanded are not something Armstrong is even willing to entertain.
Seattle’s whole strategy was to take the most “meh” players as possible, so I wouldn’t put too much stock in their valuation as a barometer for the market.
 

ChicagoBlues

Terraformers
Oct 24, 2006
15,737
6,600
I think Seattle not taking Tarasenko for free kind of set the market for him. I would think that while Armstrong is willing to move Tarasenko for free he is not willing to add assets to move him. Or it could be worse and the assets being demanded are not something Armstrong is even willing to entertain.
You make a good point here, Anthrax. We are pretty much resigned to keeping him, so he can pull his undies from his crack or build up his value enough for a decent trade.

A lot of Blues fans are all twisted up about this, which I understand, but all I care about is my Tarasenko jersey.
 

Moose and Squirrel

Registered User
Jan 15, 2021
3,685
2,703
You make a good point here, Anthrax. We are pretty much resigned to keeping him, so he can pull his undies from his crack or build up his value enough for a decent trade.

A lot of Blues fans are all twisted up about this, which I understand, but all I care about is my Tarasenko jersey.
only 45 more days till camp! lol
 

hockeyisles

Registered User
Jul 29, 2021
195
70
as more and more time passes it seems that teams are having to buy cap space.

Philly paying a 2 and a 7 to have Arizona take ghost.

Vancouver taking on that hefty contact of Ekman-Larsson to move on from Erikssen

The Islanders trading 3 high draft picks to move Ladd

Minnesota buying out Parise and Suter,

teams just dont want to taken on Salary. heck even the blues git Buchnevich at a bargain price because the Rangers didnt want to pay him

its the new NHL
 

DatDude44

Hmmmm?
Feb 23, 2012
6,234
3,028
yeah, slapping a puck is much more strenuous on the shoulder than wristing, but I think the point trying to be made is generating power, which is a fair statement.
THAT being said, he didn't have ANY issues generating power on his wrister at the end of last year. his aim was just a tad off.. till that last PO game anyways... he picked a coupla corners in that one.
I’m not referring to slap shots……wristers nowadays barely exist, their snap shots now due to the new tech in sticks
 

hockeyisles

Registered User
Jul 29, 2021
195
70
So where is the heat in this battle or has it totally cooled off?
it was based on faulty info that even its source (Elliotte Freidman) has backtracked on. it never made any sense for the Islanders to begin with. my personal belief is that Doug Armstrong fed him a story and he ran with it. Eklund reported it too but eeryone knows hes a crackpot
 

Got One Cup

Registered User
Jun 3, 2008
4,102
1,284
as more and more time passes it seems that teams are having to buy cap space.

Philly paying a 2 and a 7 to have Arizona take ghost.

Vancouver taking on that hefty contact of Ekman-Larsson to move on from Erikssen

The Islanders trading 3 high draft picks to move Ladd

Minnesota buying out Parise and Suter,

teams just dont want to taken on Salary. heck even the blues git Buchnevich at a bargain price because the Rangers didnt want to pay him

its the new NHL

COVID has changed the NHL. We can expect this trend to last at least a few more yrs. I expect Armstrong will either bit the bullet and retain for a not so good return or force Vladi to play for the Blues if he wants to stay in the nhl. Who knows maybe he comes in has a solid yr and gains interest at the deadline.
 

BigDaddyLurch

Have some PRIDE, Eric...
Mar 1, 2013
21,800
18,274
Principle's Office
Dunn wasn't a 7.5 million question mark. Tanks is and that's why he wasn't picked nor traded.

I feel for the Blues fans but right now, the ONLY option is to play him. No one is giving you a used puck until Tank is on the ice and showing that he's healthy and able. Sorry.

...basically the same position the Habs are in with Drouin; negative value until they actually play and then we see if they are "healthy" or not...not that I'm comparing Tarasenko to Drouin as players, cuz that would be lunacy...:laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad