I googled Natalie Porman and Mila Kunis...was left not disappointed. Let's just talk about that rather than argue.
I'm not even mad.
I should re-do that with my office keyboard.I'm not even mad.
I should re-do that with my office keyboard.
Certain irrelevant and untrue things that they value, yes.It's almost like pro sports teams (in literally every single league across every single sport throughout history) have certain things that that they value.
But we all know that you're smarter than every single one of them.
Certain irrelevant and untrue things that they value, yes.
Do you really buy that every single bad player outworks his teammates and is the nicest guy in the world?
I think intangibles are mostly made up and/or irrelevant.No. I think there are bad players that are also not the greatest people. Why would that be the case? Because you can be skilled but still be a bad player.
I would say that most of the low skilled, bad players are likely in the league due to intangibles, though, yes.
my biggest concern is HG not having ad block installed on his browser
I think intangibles are mostly made up and/or irrelevant.
Yes. I'm smarter than everyone who ever lived. Thanks for noticing.So, once again, you're smarter than every single team in every single league in every single sport throughout all time. You can feel free to believe that influence in the locker room is meaningless and teams will continue to tell you that you're foolish.
I'm willing to say that I certainly feel it means less than the overall skill of a team. But the idea that it is "made up and/or irrelevant" is about as silly as it gets.
Yes. I'm smarter than everyone who ever lived. Thanks for noticing.
I don't think there's anything wrong with this take.I think I’ve finally figured it out with Franson: he’s the epitome of the dude who makes egregious mistakes that stick in someone’s mind while everything else gets filtered out.
I’m not fully jumping into this because I’ve already stated my opinion on him. I do think he’s better than some make it seem, but I still think that’s only as a depth dman. As a rebuilding team, I’d rather give those minutes to Pionk or Deangelo for development purposes and move forward from there. If we need a veteran D to bring in as a security blanket, I’d go sign Paul Postma or just bring back Ryan Sproul.
I have to wonder if you've ever been involved in the hiring process of someone (I'm guessing you've never interviewed someone before). One of the key things in any hiring process is if someone can work with the overall team. It's vital. For example, I work on a very small team (about 7 overall people in our group depending on how you define what our group actually is). Most of us are very talented people in our fields. Yet we all work well together as a cohesive unit (and it's why we offer such a bespoke experience to our clients).
If we were to bring in someone that didn't play well within our group, it would cause chaos and work against our goals. However, even the couple of plugs that we have in our group get along well with everyone. The guy that does our billing is incredibly nice and easy to work with, even if I feel he could do a better job. I overlook his errors because he's not a prick unlike others in the business (his errors aren't so egregious as to actually cause problems, but he's what we have and it's too much of a pain in the ass to bring someone else in, teach them how our team works, and hope that they integrate as well as he has).
Sports teams are no different. The sports-to-life cliches are generally annoying, but they are also generally pretty accurate.
Honestly, what you're saying comes off as silly and completely out of touch. Not just in the context of sports, but in the context of how life in general works.
I think intangibles are mostly made up and/or irrelevant.
So let's say we're brain surgeons. I'm going to hire a vet because he works well with the team. **** it if people die.
That's what signing Johnson, Komarov, Beagle, Moore etc. is like.
I'm mostly in agreement with you, but you take it to a ridiculous level.
Intense work ethic took Jerry Rice to Pro Football Hall of Fame
If you think work ethic is irrelevant for example you're not living in the real world. And yes most players in the NHL have a strong work ethic and yes a strong work ethic alone won't get you anywhere. But if you have skills and more work ethic than even the people in NHL you'll be an excellent player and a better player than a guy that has the same skill but an average NHL work ethic.
I went to a very quantitative business school and Machinehead reminds me of a few friends of mine who were great at math but thought soft skills were bull**** and that it was all about the math. But you know what? That's companies look for once you start moving up in the world. Communication and collaboration are extremely important in business. Any 22 year old kid with above average intelligence can put together a spreadsheet. Executives have to know how to deal with people.
The same can be said about many folks I went to law school with.
It's simply how life works.
The most polite version of, “see avatar,” from you yetI don't think there's anything wrong with this take.
You can disagree with me all you want but bringing up the old arguments regarding the validity of the stats just derails the thread. You can do that in every other thread.It's cancer because people disagree with you? (Hell I probably 90% agree with you). What's funny is that you'll think it's our fault and not because you have a thin skin and can't take someone differing slightly in their opinion from you. I agree with like 90% of what you say, HG probably agrees with most of what you say too. But because we're not in line with every thought of yours it's cancer and unreadable. Please grow up.