The 5 tanks are back at it!

Nicko999

Registered User
Jan 23, 2008
8,124
2,085
Montreal
Honestly it is surprising how consistent those teams are season to season. Same bottom 5 for 3 years now.

22-23 season:

32- Ducks 58 pts
31- Jackets 59 pts
30- Hawks 59 pts
29- Sharks 60 pts
28- Habs 68 pts

23-24 season

32- Sharks 47 pts
31- Hawks 52 pts
30- Ducks 59 pts
29- Jackets 66 pts
28- Habs 76 pts

This season
Screenshot_20241118_010448_theScore.jpg


I am not sure of that stats but it must be pretty rare to have the same 5 teams at the bottom for 3 years straight.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bjornar Moxnes

thedjpd

Registered User
Sponsor
Dec 12, 2002
3,692
966
San Jose, CA
Honestly it is surprising how consistent those teams are season to season. Same bottom 5 for 3 years now.

22-23 season:

32- Ducks 58 pts
31- Jackets 59 pts
30- Hawks 59 pts
29- Sharks 60 pts
28- Habs 68 pts

23-24 season

32- Sharks 47 pts
31- Hawks 52 pts
30- Ducks 59 pts
29- Jackets 66 pts
28- Habs 76 pts

This season
View attachment 932116

I am not sure of that stats but it must be pretty rare to have the same 5 teams at the bottom for 3 years straight.
Would be the best thing for the league is tanking was proven to be mostly ineffective, or at best 50/50. I think we got spoiled in the last 20 years by almost to near almost generational players being at #1 or #2 overall (Crosby, Malkin, Ovechkin, McDavid, MacKinnon, Kane) who can pull up bottom dwellers to respectability alone (and often, not even).

Even if they can, it takes many years - see: Ovechkin, McDavid. Tanking will hopefully become worth it for a team but only if there's a generational level player in it at the end - maybe, just maybe, it's hopeful that if you "just get an all-star" player, the purposeful tank may not fruitful enough to tank entire seasons for them (as that would be a 1/4 chance at best for the worst team in the league).
 
  • Like
Reactions: User9992

Maitz

Registered User
Aug 3, 2006
3,514
2,355
Montreal
I remember having 2-3 teams always at the bottom of the standings for few years in a row but now 3 years having the same bottom 5, not sure if it's a good thing
 

Nogatco Rd

Pierre-Luc Dubas
Apr 3, 2021
2,904
5,400
crazy that you can look at the Blue Jackets’ schedule and spot the moment when their jinx thread was started


IMG_7091.jpeg
 

tiburon12

Registered User
Jul 18, 2009
5,087
5,172
Would be the best thing for the league is tanking was proven to be mostly ineffective, or at best 50/50. I think we got spoiled in the last 20 years by almost to near almost generational players being at #1 or #2 overall (Crosby, Malkin, Ovechkin, McDavid, MacKinnon, Kane) who can pull up bottom dwellers to respectability alone (and often, not even).

Even if they can, it takes many years - see: Ovechkin, McDavid. Tanking will hopefully become worth it for a team but only if there's a generational level player in it at the end - maybe, just maybe, it's hopeful that if you "just get an all-star" player, the purposeful tank may not fruitful enough to tank entire seasons for them (as that would be a 1/4 chance at best for the worst team in the league).

Tanking has proven to be more unsuccessful than successful over course of the post-lockout era. MacKinnon and Ekblad are the only #1 picks since 08 #1 Stamkos to win the cup. ~10 years for each of them to win. For reference, Malkin/Crosby were drafted in 04/05 and won in 09, Toews/Kane drafted in 06/07 and won in 10. This kinda of turnaround doesn't happen anymore.

In that same window 2008-present window:
  • #2 Barkov, Hedman, Doughty, Landeskog all won with their draft teams, Eichel and reinhart after trades, and Seguin on his draft team(but the Bruins didnt tank to get him).
  • #3 Bogosian won with not his draft team and in a bottom pair role
  • #4 Byram, Makar, Pietrangelo are the only winners with their draft team, Bennett won on his 2nd team. Critically, Makar and Byram were drafted 6 and 8 years, respectively, after Landeskog, who was 2 years AFTER Duchene and O'reilly were drafted.
  • #5 Schenn bros are the only to win, both not on their draft teams.
Thats 17 players across 7 cup winning teams, over 16 years and 90 top 5 picks.

Point being, tanking isn't a guarantee for success and even if it is, the teams who have proved it works took a decade to make it happen AND got arguably their most important pieces years after tanking a top pick (Rantanen/Makar, Kucherov/Vasi, Tkachuk/Bob).

Ducks and Habs are a great example of why tanking is a risk, and as a Sharks fan i'm definitely nervous about the next few years. Nothing is close to a guarantee
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $85.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $50,050.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad