Speculation: - The 2026-27 Roster Speculation Thread: Summer Edition - Throw in All The Oars, We're Trading for Battleships | Page 74 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: The 2026-27 Roster Speculation Thread: Summer Edition - Throw in All The Oars, We're Trading for Battleships

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
i would ONLY trade Byram if he refuses to extend this summer, and in that case I would prefer that they traded Byram for an elite forward OR one with truly elite top end potential. Tippett, Eklund, Kyrou dont quite meet that imo. Players like Robertson, Dorofeyev, Connor, Forsberg, Nylander, Michkov, Lafreniere, Byfield, Fantilli would have me interested.
One name here is not like the others lol
 
My moves would end up with a roster like this. I think we could add some picks on top of this by slimming down the roster.
Norris will get injured, then you add a fit Kulich to the lineup and move Helenius to center.

Östlund-Norris-Thompson
Benson-Trocheck-Doan
Helenius-Wright-Quinn
Greenway-McLeod-Carrick
Kozak
AHL: Kulich

Dahlin-Samuelsson
Power-Byram
Johnson-Timmins
Metsä

Lyon
Levi
Ellis
 
My moves would end up with a roster like this. I think we could add some picks on top of this by slimming down the roster.
Norris will get injured, then you add a fit Kulich to the lineup and move Helenius to center.

Östlund-Norris-Thompson
Benson-Trocheck-Doan
Helenius-Wright-Quinn
Greenway-McLeod-Carrick
Kozak
AHL: Kulich

Dahlin-Samuelsson
Power-Byram
Johnson-Timmins
Metsä

Lyon
Levi
Ellis
I have liked the idea of adding Wright for awhile, i think he desperately needs a change of scenery and would thrive in Buffalo. Seattle has been actively shopping him for awhile, I think maybe a sign and trade tuch + picks or b tier prospects could land us wright.
 
My moves would end up with a roster like this. I think we could add some picks on top of this by slimming down the roster.
Norris will get injured, then you add a fit Kulich to the lineup and move Helenius to center.

Östlund-Norris-Thompson
Benson-Trocheck-Doan
Helenius-Wright-Quinn
Greenway-McLeod-Carrick
Kozak
AHL: Kulich

Dahlin-Samuelsson
Power-Byram
Johnson-Timmins
Metsä

Lyon
Levi
Ellis
I think Helenius starts at center. He played center in the playoffs so I don't think this is a situation where he needs to play wing to learn the game and then move to center. I think he starts as the 3C
 
I have liked the idea of adding Wright for awhile, i think he desperately needs a change of scenery and would thrive in Buffalo. Seattle has been actively shopping him for awhile, I think maybe a sign and trade tuch + picks or b tier prospects could land us wright.
It's hard to decide on his value. They have way too many centers and maybe the GM has a rhd fetish.
Kesselring for Wright would be a double deflated value trade with some risk for both teams.
 
I think Helenius starts at center. He played center in the playoffs so I don't think this is a situation where he needs to play wing to learn the game and then move to center. I think he starts as the 3C
Could flip him and Norris for better balance when it comes to handedness.

With the top 4 set I like the idea of securing the middle of the lineup.

I wouldn't mind a big winger down the line but letting Tuch walk and trading for Knies seems like weird priorities. Kept Zucker and Greenway to ensure enough meatshields on the team.
I hate B Tkachuk but if Ottawa unintentionally tanks towards a multi year rebuild he could be an (unlikely) option.
 
He does not need a top line F.

If they want to build off of last season, I do think they need to do more than bank on internal development to replace Tuch.

If they are OK with possibly taking a step back to bank on the kids in 2026-27, then they do not need to make a meaningful addition to replace Tuch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob582
I'm talking about any of their own business regarding UFA or RFA players.

I wouldn't be surprised if the three big rocks (Tuch, Byram, and Benson) don't completely block Jarmo from doing something with a guy like Malenstyn.

I wonder if there are any other pending UFAs they are talking to besides Tuch and likely Malenstyn. Maybe Dunne since he's a low cost depth guy.
 
It's hard to decide on his value. They have way too many centers and maybe the GM has a rhd fetish.
Kesselring for Wright would be a double deflated value trade with some risk for both teams.
I like taking a shot with Wright but he doesn't really fit at center for Buffalo unless McLeod was traded.
 
Wright is more than capable of playing wing, in fact, he might do even better there.
Why trade for an underperforming natural center only to play him at wing to see if he can play better?

We are past that stage with Buffalo. We should just trade for a winger then instead of trying to experiment.

Also our wingers are set and all of them are more productive than Shane Wright.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if the three big rocks (Tuch, Byram, and Benson) don't completely block Jarmo from doing something with a guy like Malenstyn.

I wonder if there are any other pending UFAs they are talking to besides Tuch and likely Malenstyn. Maybe Dunne since he's a low cost depth guy.
Malenstyn would low key be just as big a loss as Tuck.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if the three big rocks (Tuch, Byram, and Benson) don't completely block Jarmo from doing something with a guy like Malenstyn.

I wonder if there are any other pending UFAs they are talking to besides Tuch and likely Malenstyn. Maybe Dunne since he's a low cost depth guy.

Any Byram extension wouldn't take effect until 27-28, for what that's worth
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dingo44
Why trade for an underperforming natural center only to play him at wing to see if he can play better?

We are past that stage with Buffalo. We should just trade for a winger then instead of trying to experiment.

Also our wingers are set and all of them are more productive than Shane Wright.
because the plus side is, he can turn into a productive center, with a low end 1c to 2c ceiling. At worst he's probably a 3c. and to get that, we probably don't have to give up much. Right now we have Kulich, Ostlund, Helenius who we hope can turn into productive Centers and we would be very fortunate if 1 of them hits as a 1c. The more bites at the apple, the more likely you are at getting a hit. Wright put up 44 pts in 79 games with 3rd-line usage and PP2 in his rookie season, one of the highest points per 60 in the NHL. He had a points regression this year in the same limited role with worse linemates. And honestly, having Lambert as a coach isn't doing him any favors.

I would be willing to take that bet that we could turn him into a legit Center. And we could use any of Kulich/Ostlund/Helenius/Wright on the wings as necessary.

I don't believe the cost to acquire Wright will be high should be a flyer we take.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad