OgeeOgelthorpe
Riccis per 60 record holder
- Feb 29, 2020
- 18,252
- 19,948
Hard pass.
I also doubt he hits the market.
What do you have against good hockey players?
Hard pass.
I also doubt he hits the market.
I don’t think he’s worth the $ he’s gonna get and I’d prefer not to add another undersized guy to the top 6.What do you have against good hockey players?
I’d love to have him too, but he’s got another year I think. I don’t expect St. Louis to trade him cheap.
They’re going to be sorry if and when they do pay him that. Think Toronto could do it?I don’t think he’s worth the $ he’s gonna get and I’d prefer not to add another undersized guy to the top 6.
I think he’s a good hockey player but I am pretty skeptical he’s a 8 million dollar player. I’d rather let someone else pay him that and they can find out.
I think 8 million might be too low for Toronto. They tend to start at 8 figures.They’re going to be sorry if and when they do pay him that. Think Toronto could do it?
Well shoot, we got a 80-point player in Patty Kane then!
That was my feeling exactly about the trade deadline. The team was in a rough spot last year at the deadline, he decided to sell, and the team collapsed. Not saying he should have bought the farm, but just throw out a 3rd round draft pick or something, bring someone in just so the team knows you think they've got what it takes. He's basically saying to the team, you weren't worth investing anything in. Larkin wasn't hurt the first two games of this streak, and I don't think he was hurt when they collapsed in Ottawa last year.The Wings need another center option to take the heat off Larkin and cover for him during injury. If you take Petterson off Vancouver, McDavid off Edmonton, Matthews off Toronto, those teams are all f***ed. We are no different, except that we have even worse center depth.
Our most important players have almost no experience in the playoffs, or even getting to the playoffs.
Our coach has no idea how to manage team mood and motivation. It seems like he always manages to find the absolute worst thing to say during press conferences.
Yzerman told the team he doesn't think they have a chance in the playoffs by making no moves to address obvious weaknesses.
All of these are a recipe for collapse. Yzerman is operating on a timeline that is years slower than what we want. It sucks but we can't do anything about it. He has no pressure because you can't fire Steve f***ing Yzerman in Detroit. Hopefully his plan works out.
Once Danielson and Kasper are on the team (I hope next year) we will hopefully have a true 2c on the roster. The nice thing about those guys is they both play with energy and grit and they are both leaders. None of our young guys have that. I think having them on the roster is going to transform the team. Unfortunately, it will take one of them 2-3 years to transform into that steady presence.
I agree draft overall number is irrelevant but i've seen numerous post where people has said "you need stars to win and we need top-3 pick to get stars". Yet no one really seems to have a answer how do you define stars. Very few of them are stars before they even play in the NHL and some pops up out of nowhere. I think people are way too impatient, we have great prospect pool and there could be a star or two in it. But crying after stars at this point is futile imo, since our best prospects ain't even in NHL yet and naturally every player has it's own adjustment period.Draft position is irrelevant and to be fair nobody said anything to the contrary...
Typically players with awards and trophies also produced big numbers and not many teams ever win w/o any teammates who produce...
The discussion was about what the team needs in order to win(or hope to win) and the debate is about how and when SY and co manage to meet those needs.. nobody said our prospects arent good...they are...but it's going to be 5 more years before Kasper, Danielson or Edvinsson are reliable elite producing players or Cossa is a high end #1 goalie..that's not meant to slight them or doubt them but rather an honest evaluation of how hard it is to achieve that status in the NHL..
100% I guess the debate is such...are our prospects future stars and if it takes on avg. 300 to 400 NHL games to reach that level (outside of top 3 drafted/generational players) what do we do in the meantime (300 to 400 games equals another 4 to 5 years for those currently in the CHL/AHL/Europe) and should they not reach that level of play, it'll have been 10 years under SY tutelage so what then?I agree draft overall number is irrelevant but i've seen numerous post where people has said "you need stars to win and we need top-3 pick to get stars". Yet no one really seems to have a answer how do you define stars. Very few of them are stars before they even play in the NHL and some pops up out of nowhere. I think people are way too impatient, we have great prospect pool and there could be a star or two in it. But crying after stars at this point is futile imo, since our best prospects ain't even in NHL yet and naturally every player has it's own adjustment period.